Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The drowned neo-gothic tower twigl shader created by Fable 5.1 with the same prompt. (compare to Fable 5 in the quoted tweet, and other models before that)

emollick's profile picture

Ethan Mollick

383,766 subscribers

192,187 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Kimi K3 on my shader test: "create a visually interesting shader that can run in twigl-dot-app make it like an infinite city of neo-gothic towers partially drowned in a stormy ocean with large waves." "Make it better" Very good model, not Sol Max or Fable, but great open weights
0:13

Kimi K3 on my shader test: "create a visually interesting shader that can run in twigl-dot-app make it like an infinite city of neo-gothic towers partially drowned in a stormy ocean with large waves." "Make it better" Very good model, not Sol Max or Fable, but great open weights

Ethan Mollick

280,576 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

GPT 5.6 Pro Mogs Fable 5 in this prompt 😳 Prompt : make bmpt-72 turret in three js - low poly with recognizable silhuette in one html code block . quoted image is output from fable 5 created by Mirochill
0:11

GPT 5.6 Pro Mogs Fable 5 in this prompt 😳 Prompt : make bmpt-72 turret in three js - low poly with recognizable silhuette in one html code block . quoted image is output from fable 5 created by Mirochill

Chetaslua

65,269 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?
0:20

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

145,921 просмотров • 3 дней назад

I tested Gemini 3.8 Flash on the SAME EXACT Mario Kart prompt that I tested Fable 5.1 on yesterday. Google disappoints yet again.
0:18

I tested Gemini 3.8 Flash on the SAME EXACT Mario Kart prompt that I tested Fable 5.1 on yesterday. Google disappoints yet again.

BridgeMind

65,317 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Claude Fable 5 designs a complete 3D-printable model in a browser-based CAD editor. The editor was also created by Fable 5, including the built-in AI copilot that does the modeling.
0:14

Claude Fable 5 designs a complete 3D-printable model in a browser-based CAD editor. The editor was also created by Fable 5, including the built-in AI copilot that does the modeling.

Angry Tom

269,529 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable: "I want a twigl shader that renders Lost Carcosa from The King in Yellow." (Shaders are procedurally generated using math alone) Along the shore the cloud waves break, The twin suns sink behind the lake, The shadows lengthen In Carcosa
0:10

Fable: "I want a twigl shader that renders Lost Carcosa from The King in Yellow." (Shaders are procedurally generated using math alone) Along the shore the cloud waves break, The twin suns sink behind the lake, The shadows lengthen In Carcosa

Ethan Mollick

19,044 просмотров • 14 дней назад

DeepSeek v4 Pro just built this entire design for $0.0005. - Same prompt, same harness, ran against Fable 5 - DeepSeek needed the right taste layer to compete - Fable 5 just needed a precise prompt Open source keeps closing the gap on price.
0:10

DeepSeek v4 Pro just built this entire design for $0.0005. - Same prompt, same harness, ran against Fable 5 - DeepSeek needed the right taste layer to compete - Fable 5 just needed a precise prompt Open source keeps closing the gap on price.

0xMarioNawfal

59,746 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Fable 5 briefing site was just the first one. We used Claude Fable 5 in Open Design to generate polished websites across styles. Landing pages, product pages, editorials, launch pages — prompt-built and ready to remix. Watch Fable 5 build in Open Design ↓
0:16

The Fable 5 briefing site was just the first one. We used Claude Fable 5 in Open Design to generate polished websites across styles. Landing pages, product pages, editorials, launch pages — prompt-built and ready to remix. Watch Fable 5 build in Open Design ↓

Open Design

18,572 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?
0:18

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

J A Z I I

40,331 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Say what you will about Anthropic, but Fable is pretty amazing at 3D design. Fed both the same Minecraft prompt (with a Minecraft skill) and got this for Fable:
0:15

Say what you will about Anthropic, but Fable is pretty amazing at 3D design. Fed both the same Minecraft prompt (with a Minecraft skill) and got this for Fable:

Matt Zhou

48,404 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 are #1 when it comes to UI. GPT 5.6 Sol and Grok 4.6 don't come anywhere close to the design capabilities that Claude models have. Even though Fable 5 and Opus 5 are slow and expensive I keep finding myself reaching for them for design. This hero section was made with Fable 5 and Opus 5.
0:10

Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 are #1 when it comes to UI. GPT 5.6 Sol and Grok 4.6 don't come anywhere close to the design capabilities that Claude models have. Even though Fable 5 and Opus 5 are slow and expensive I keep finding myself reaching for them for design. This hero section was made with Fable 5 and Opus 5.

BridgeMind

58,702 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Kimi K3 VS Claude Fable 5. Prompt in the 🧵, now try it on Flowith.
0:14

Kimi K3 VS Claude Fable 5. Prompt in the 🧵, now try it on Flowith.

Flowith

73,092 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC JUST DROPPED THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO PROMPTING FABLE 5. This is the most important prompting framework I've seen. Bookmark this before you forget. Most people treat Fable 5 like a chatbot. That's the mistake. > don't over-engineer prompts — it degrades output. > use /loop for autonomous multi-step work. > give it the goal, not step-by-step commands. > add a memory file. it learns from past runs. > spin up 50+ subagents for complex tasks. Fable 5 isn't an assistant. it's a consultant that leads the work. Read it before you write another prompt. Claude → Fable 5 → Autonomous Work → Real Output → Money
0:11

ANTHROPIC JUST DROPPED THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO PROMPTING FABLE 5. This is the most important prompting framework I've seen. Bookmark this before you forget. Most people treat Fable 5 like a chatbot. That's the mistake. > don't over-engineer prompts — it degrades output. > use /loop for autonomous multi-step work. > give it the goal, not step-by-step commands. > add a memory file. it learns from past runs. > spin up 50+ subagents for complex tasks. Fable 5 isn't an assistant. it's a consultant that leads the work. Read it before you write another prompt. Claude → Fable 5 → Autonomous Work → Real Output → Money

Kirill

415,878 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

28,435 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

With the release of Fable 5, I thought it would be fun to build and open-source a new MacOS screensaver using a metal shader, that way could also try building your own! Totally free, link to the repo below
0:15

With the release of Fable 5, I thought it would be fun to build and open-source a new MacOS screensaver using a metal shader, that way could also try building your own! Totally free, link to the repo below

Daniel Destefanis

55,346 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this
0:16

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fokki

72,175 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I had access to Opus 5 before release and found it to be a good model if a quirky one. On shorter tasks, it could match or beat Fable levels of performance, at longer tasks it seemed less ambitious & would not deliver as complete a set of work. Here is its neo-gothic shader.
0:11

I had access to Opus 5 before release and found it to be a good model if a quirky one. On shorter tasks, it could match or beat Fable levels of performance, at longer tasks it seemed less ambitious & would not deliver as complete a set of work. Here is its neo-gothic shader.

Ethan Mollick

101,569 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.
0:16

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.

atomic.chat

2,839,437 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

playing with fable 5. made a tool to generate the background video.
0:14

playing with fable 5. made a tool to generate the background video.

Vadim Carazan

25,834 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.
0:20

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,277 просмотров • 1 месяц назад