Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I used Opus 5 with the Unity CLI and Gauntlet Loop to see how well it could build games within Unity. While reviews are mixed on Opus 5 for coding and tasks in general - I think it's a huge unlock for gamedevs. It's understanding of 3D space +...

34,623 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля trenchin.net 🪖
trenchin.net 🪖1 месяц назад

GM looks good

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

thank you!

Фото профиля Gamibase
Gamibase1 месяц назад

Gamibase be be out soon and it would be fun to see what it can do when using it with Unity CLI...

Фото профиля Tristan Rhodes
Tristan Rhodes1 месяц назад

Thx I needed this

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Anytime Tristan!!

Фото профиля Dajan Vulaj
Dajan Vulaj1 месяц назад

I tried unity cli and opus 5 ultracode in 2 projects, and in both the 3d generated worlds where poor and un textured well. Are you using the mcp to generate the 3d world or any external assets? As in your example the scene looks beautifuly put together.

Фото профиля Lightning Forge Games (LFG!) 🔺
Lightning Forge Games (LFG!) 🔺1 месяц назад

Does the CLI need to be granted access or anyone can do it now?

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Available for free for everyone

Фото профиля Fiducial.ai
Fiducial.ai1 месяц назад

does the gauntlet loop catch unity compile errors on its own?

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Yeah seemed to because of the unity cli

Фото профиля MR. E MONEYBAGGS
MR. E MONEYBAGGS1 месяц назад

Thats a really good foundation

Фото профиля Manstu
Manstu1 месяц назад

I love seeing these videos because I can’t help but think what this all looks like a few months from now, then a year, etc. very cool!

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Yeah it’s progressing really fast! Really exciting times

Фото профиля Gürsel Günacar
Gürsel Günacar1 месяц назад

very useful video. Thanks, bro.

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Appreciate the comment ! thank u

Фото профиля Erik Reynolds
Erik Reynolds1 месяц назад

What do you think of Unreal’s native MCP

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Not used it but i heard the tool calling is quite verbose and slow. Would love an unreal CLI or something

Фото профиля rusa
rusa1 месяц назад

the interesting failure in that loop is playtesting. an agent can build and compile and still have no idea the jump feels wrong, so whatever stands in for a player is the entire experiment. compiling was never the bottleneck.

Фото профиля Pepe Hogan
Pepe Hogan1 месяц назад

What is gauntlet loop where can I learn more

Фото профиля Ian
Ian1 месяц назад

can Spriterrific create combined 90 and 45 degree facing sprites or is it 90 degree facings only?

Фото профиля Gamer 𝕃𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕍𝕀
Gamer 𝕃𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕍𝕀1 месяц назад

How many hours / days / weeks / months did you put into this?

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

6 hours for the loop that ran. First one was maybe an afternoon of prompting

Фото профиля Yule
Yule1 месяц назад

Do unreal engine instead

Фото профиля RemiDev
RemiDev1 месяц назад

How effective is the Gauntlet loop in Unity?... From your video towards the end I can see it actually did try in making some nice visuals using just primitive shapes

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Worked really well imo

Фото профиля Tenth Legion Games
Tenth Legion Games1 месяц назад

Now THIS is the Opus 5 game dev stuff I want to see. Throw it into Unity, give it tools, make it iterate and see what breaks. Way more useful than another one-shot browser game.

Фото профиля Privateer
Privateer1 месяц назад

Nice village mate!

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

Cheers !

Фото профиля Ridwan 💻👾
Ridwan 💻👾1 месяц назад

How does it handle unity scene files with all its gibberish?

Фото профиля Chong-U
Chong-U1 месяц назад

With the unity cli and it being able to handle the editor - works pretty well

Фото профиля Ridwan 💻👾
Ridwan 💻👾1 месяц назад

Nice! I'll take a look! Your game looks great

Фото профиля nezsek
nezsek1 месяц назад

Was it expensive to make? How much usage of tools did it take?

Фото профиля JackZ|杰克周
JackZ|杰克周1 месяц назад

Hi Chong I like your content very much. Glad to be connected.Maybe you should also try , I am using Cindy+Godot combination working on my first Vibe coding game

Фото профиля Mr Pixel | Driftania 🏝
Mr Pixel | Driftania 🏝1 месяц назад

This kind of AI + Unity workflow is getting scarily effective. Great breakdown.

Похожие видео

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 просмотров • 1 год назад