Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

“Is AI overhyped or underhyped?” Fei-Fei Li: "Silicon Valley can mistake clear vision with short distance. In 2006 the first self-driving car drove 140 miles...it still took 20 years for Waymo to be barely on the road." "Clear vision is important, but the journey will be long."

TBPN

1,209,716 subscribers

96,564 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li), the Godmother of AI, on the origin of computer vision and why spatial intelligence is the next frontier. At AI Startup School in San Francisco. 01:00 - Origins of ImageNet 02:15 - The Dream to Make Machines See 03:28 - A paradigm shift in AI 05:50 - AlexNet and Deep Learning 08:00 - Evolving Computer Vision 12:20 - Building World Labs 13:00 - The next frontier in AI 14:20 - Why Spatial Intelligence Is Harder Than Language 18:40 - Technical Barriers for Vision-Based AI 20:00 - AI is more than LLMs 25:50 - Fei Fei’s Journey 29:30 - Mentoring some of the legends of AI 33:00 - Audience Q&A

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li), the Godmother of AI, on the origin of computer vision and why spatial intelligence is the next frontier. At AI Startup School in San Francisco. 01:00 - Origins of ImageNet 02:15 - The Dream to Make Machines See 03:28 - A paradigm shift in AI 05:50 - AlexNet and Deep Learning 08:00 - Evolving Computer Vision 12:20 - Building World Labs 13:00 - The next frontier in AI 14:20 - Why Spatial Intelligence Is Harder Than Language 18:40 - Technical Barriers for Vision-Based AI 20:00 - AI is more than LLMs 25:50 - Fei Fei’s Journey 29:30 - Mentoring some of the legends of AI 33:00 - Audience Q&A

Y Combinator

194,705 просмотров • 1 год назад

Fei-Fei Li says AI is not over-hyped; it is a civilizational technology that represents the new computing Wherever chips exist today, from light bulbs to self-driving cars, AI will inevitably follow "wherever there is compute, there will be AI"

Fei-Fei Li says AI is not over-hyped; it is a civilizational technology that represents the new computing Wherever chips exist today, from light bulbs to self-driving cars, AI will inevitably follow "wherever there is compute, there will be AI"

Haider.

102,542 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Fei-Fei Li: Open Source AI Needs To Be Protected⁣ ⁣ "I think open source should be protected. If there is efforts of open source both in public sector as like academia as well as private sector is so important. It's so important for the entrepreneurial ecosystem." — Fei-Fei Li

Fei-Fei Li: Open Source AI Needs To Be Protected⁣ ⁣ "I think open source should be protected. If there is efforts of open source both in public sector as like academia as well as private sector is so important. It's so important for the entrepreneurial ecosystem." — Fei-Fei Li

AI Insights

33,472 просмотров • 1 год назад

“People are wildly overestimating what AI will do to society in the next two or three years, and wildly underestimating what it will do in ten or fifteen. It’s going to be slow, and then all of a sudden." Brian Chesky on whether AI is overhyped or underhyped:

“People are wildly overestimating what AI will do to society in the next two or three years, and wildly underestimating what it will do in ten or fifteen. It’s going to be slow, and then all of a sudden." Brian Chesky on whether AI is overhyped or underhyped:

TBPN

40,443 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Fei-Fei Li on what simulation can do for robotics that real-world data can't: "You play out events that haven't happened, or cannot happen... And while you play it out, you learn how to act in it." "That's really important in robotics, because we cannot possibly have enough real-world data for that." "Here is a real life example: the industry of self-driving cars. Waymo has officially said they use billions of hours of simulation." "Cars are the simplest kind of robots. So clearly simulation plays a huge role in robotic learning." Fei-Fei Li Yunzhu Li World Labs martin_casado

Fei-Fei Li on what simulation can do for robotics that real-world data can't: "You play out events that haven't happened, or cannot happen... And while you play it out, you learn how to act in it." "That's really important in robotics, because we cannot possibly have enough real-world data for that." "Here is a real life example: the industry of self-driving cars. Waymo has officially said they use billions of hours of simulation." "Cars are the simplest kind of robots. So clearly simulation plays a huge role in robotic learning." Fei-Fei Li Yunzhu Li World Labs martin_casado

a16z

35,480 просмотров • 26 дней назад

I loved getting to discuss the future of artificial intelligence—while sitting in a self-driving car!—with renowned computer scientist Fei-Fei Li. Her new book, The Worlds I See, is out tomorrow. I think you’ll want to read it.

I loved getting to discuss the future of artificial intelligence—while sitting in a self-driving car!—with renowned computer scientist Fei-Fei Li. Her new book, The Worlds I See, is out tomorrow. I think you’ll want to read it.

Melinda French Gates

134,807 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The godmother of AI just delivered the reality check Silicon Valley refuses to hear. She has the standing to say it. Li: “Silicon Valley as a whole tends to mistake clear vision with short distance.” Seeing the destination clearly has nothing to do with how hard it is to reach. Self-driving cars were first demonstrated in 2006. Twenty years later Waymo is barely on the road. The vision was never the problem. The distance was. Clarity of destination gets mistaken for proximity to arrival. That’s the mistake the industry keeps making. And keeps making. Li: “I consider myself a scientist in my heart and I actually really don’t like hyping.” In an industry running at maximum temperature, Fei-Fei Li is one of the few people at the top willing to say that publicly. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the gap between what’s visible and what’s required is being systematically underestimated. Large Language Models dominate the conversation. Text to text. Comparatively contained. The harder problem is spatial intelligence. AI that reasons about and acts within the physical three-dimensional world. Hardware. Physics. Data that doesn’t exist yet. Real-time adaptation to chaos. A robot that can clean a bathroom requires understanding every surface, every object, every force, every exception. That’s not a software update. That’s a civilizational research problem. Li: “I don’t call it hype. I call it a misleading sentiment. We don’t want to replace human creators.” The second place the industry gets it wrong is creativity. The narrative has hardened around replacement. AI takes the jobs. AI tells the stories. AI makes the art. Li considers that not just wrong but destructive. Wrong because AI doesn’t replicate creativity. Destructive because believing it can devalues the humans creating culture. Human creativity isn’t a process to be automated. It’s fundamental to what we are as a species. The goal is augmentation. Tools that make human creators faster and more capable. Not systems that generate output in the style of human work and call it creation. That distinction matters more than most people in the industry are willing to sit with. Precision of imagination is not proximity to reality. Li has spent her career in the gap between those two things. The map isn’t the territory. The journey is long. The hurdles are deep. And the scientist who built the foundation this era stands on is telling you the timeline everyone is selling is wrong. We’ve been almost there with self-driving for twenty years. The pattern doesn’t change just because the destination looks different.

The godmother of AI just delivered the reality check Silicon Valley refuses to hear. She has the standing to say it. Li: “Silicon Valley as a whole tends to mistake clear vision with short distance.” Seeing the destination clearly has nothing to do with how hard it is to reach. Self-driving cars were first demonstrated in 2006. Twenty years later Waymo is barely on the road. The vision was never the problem. The distance was. Clarity of destination gets mistaken for proximity to arrival. That’s the mistake the industry keeps making. And keeps making. Li: “I consider myself a scientist in my heart and I actually really don’t like hyping.” In an industry running at maximum temperature, Fei-Fei Li is one of the few people at the top willing to say that publicly. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the gap between what’s visible and what’s required is being systematically underestimated. Large Language Models dominate the conversation. Text to text. Comparatively contained. The harder problem is spatial intelligence. AI that reasons about and acts within the physical three-dimensional world. Hardware. Physics. Data that doesn’t exist yet. Real-time adaptation to chaos. A robot that can clean a bathroom requires understanding every surface, every object, every force, every exception. That’s not a software update. That’s a civilizational research problem. Li: “I don’t call it hype. I call it a misleading sentiment. We don’t want to replace human creators.” The second place the industry gets it wrong is creativity. The narrative has hardened around replacement. AI takes the jobs. AI tells the stories. AI makes the art. Li considers that not just wrong but destructive. Wrong because AI doesn’t replicate creativity. Destructive because believing it can devalues the humans creating culture. Human creativity isn’t a process to be automated. It’s fundamental to what we are as a species. The goal is augmentation. Tools that make human creators faster and more capable. Not systems that generate output in the style of human work and call it creation. That distinction matters more than most people in the industry are willing to sit with. Precision of imagination is not proximity to reality. Li has spent her career in the gap between those two things. The map isn’t the territory. The journey is long. The hurdles are deep. And the scientist who built the foundation this era stands on is telling you the timeline everyone is selling is wrong. We’ve been almost there with self-driving for twenty years. The pattern doesn’t change just because the destination looks different.

Dustin

260,690 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk in new interview: "10 years from now, probably 90% of all distance driven will be driven by the AI in a self-driving car. It will be quite a niche thing in 10 years to actually be driving your own car." AI already drives for 90%+ of the miles I travel.

Elon Musk in new interview: "10 years from now, probably 90% of all distance driven will be driven by the AI in a self-driving car. It will be quite a niche thing in 10 years to actually be driving your own car." AI already drives for 90%+ of the miles I travel.

Sawyer Merritt

1,652,829 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Tesla Vision AI is designed to be advanced enough to control the car completely on its own. It runs even when you're driving manually, protecting you and other road users at all times. 4K:

Tesla Vision AI is designed to be advanced enough to control the car completely on its own. It runs even when you're driving manually, protecting you and other road users at all times. 4K:

Whole Mars Catalog

1,668,654 просмотров • 3 лет назад

NEW: Phoenix police officer pulls over a driverless Waymo car for driving on the wrong side of the road leading the nonexistent driver to roll the windows down to speak with the police. This is hilarious. Waymo has since released a statement, apparently blaming the incident on "inconsistent construction signage." The car "was blocked from navigating back into the correct lane" for about 30 seconds when the officer pulled it over. "In an effort to clear the intersection, the Waymo vehicle proceeded forward a short distance and pulled into the next available parking lot," the company said.

NEW: Phoenix police officer pulls over a driverless Waymo car for driving on the wrong side of the road leading the nonexistent driver to roll the windows down to speak with the police. This is hilarious. Waymo has since released a statement, apparently blaming the incident on "inconsistent construction signage." The car "was blocked from navigating back into the correct lane" for about 30 seconds when the officer pulled it over. "In an effort to clear the intersection, the Waymo vehicle proceeded forward a short distance and pulled into the next available parking lot," the company said.

Collin Rugg

10,378,460 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Jordi asks Silicon Valley congressman Ro Khanna about his post calling for regulation in the trucking industry, and that AI "should not be used for mass layoffs that drive up short term profits w/ no productivity gains." "Have a human in the loop." "We can reimagine what the role of a truck driver is going to be..." "It doesn't seem unreasonable to say that for five years we want a driver in the loop, and let's rethink the types of jobs that [truckers will do]."

Jordi asks Silicon Valley congressman Ro Khanna about his post calling for regulation in the trucking industry, and that AI "should not be used for mass layoffs that drive up short term profits w/ no productivity gains." "Have a human in the loop." "We can reimagine what the role of a truck driver is going to be..." "It doesn't seem unreasonable to say that for five years we want a driver in the loop, and let's rethink the types of jobs that [truckers will do]."

TBPN

52,422 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇫🇷🇺🇦🇷🇺 "I am relatively skeptical that there can be peace in the short team" — France's Macron on Russia-Ukraine conflict "There is no vision on the part of the Russian side for peace as clear as we see it on our side"

🇫🇷🇺🇦🇷🇺 "I am relatively skeptical that there can be peace in the short team" — France's Macron on Russia-Ukraine conflict "There is no vision on the part of the Russian side for peace as clear as we see it on our side"

Lord Bebo

16,162 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Isaiah Taylor - making nuclear reactors says Valar Atomics ultimately wants to use its own low-cost electricity to make steel, aluminum, and other products. "Our long-term vision is to actually have the cheapest energy on earth and to use it for our own things." "We see a vision of the world where steel is just way cheaper than it is today. Aluminum is way cheaper than it is today. The manipulation of matter is a lot cheaper because you have robotics hooked up to AI that's doing matter manipulation and vision. All these things take energy." "It'll be interesting to see where we decide to play in the stack. I think we want to be in the business of turning on thousands of reactors, but there will be a couple of massive markets that we attach to."

.Isaiah Taylor - making nuclear reactors says Valar Atomics ultimately wants to use its own low-cost electricity to make steel, aluminum, and other products. "Our long-term vision is to actually have the cheapest energy on earth and to use it for our own things." "We see a vision of the world where steel is just way cheaper than it is today. Aluminum is way cheaper than it is today. The manipulation of matter is a lot cheaper because you have robotics hooked up to AI that's doing matter manipulation and vision. All these things take energy." "It'll be interesting to see where we decide to play in the stack. I think we want to be in the business of turning on thousands of reactors, but there will be a couple of massive markets that we attach to."

TBPN

46,120 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Elon Musk: Tesla self-driving is so powerful it could drive on an alien planet. “Waymo has autonomous vehicles with no one in it, but they're limited a few cities in the U.S. The Tesla solution is a much more difficult path to go but ultimately much more powerful. It is a general solution to self-driving. The Tesla software is just purely AI and vision. It doesn't rely on any expensive sensors, no LiDAR, no radars, or it doesn't even require knowing the area beforehand. You could have it drive someplace it's never been before and no Tesla's ever been before, it could be on an alien planet, and the car will still drive. And that's this year.” Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

Elon Musk: Tesla self-driving is so powerful it could drive on an alien planet. “Waymo has autonomous vehicles with no one in it, but they're limited a few cities in the U.S. The Tesla solution is a much more difficult path to go but ultimately much more powerful. It is a general solution to self-driving. The Tesla software is just purely AI and vision. It doesn't rely on any expensive sensors, no LiDAR, no radars, or it doesn't even require knowing the area beforehand. You could have it drive someplace it's never been before and no Tesla's ever been before, it could be on an alien planet, and the car will still drive. And that's this year.” Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

ELON CLIPS

258,484 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

ELON: TESLA’S APPROACH TO SELF-DRIVING IS DIFFICULT BUT ULTIMATELY VERY POWERFUL “There already are autonomous vehicles in some regions. Waymo has autonomous vehicles with no one in it. But they're limited to a few cities in the U.S. The Tesla solution, which is a much more difficult path to go but ultimately much more powerful, is a general solution to self-driving. The Tesla software is purely AI and vision. It doesn't rely on any expensive sensors, no lidars, no radars. It doesn't even require knowing the area beforehand. You could have it drive someplace it's never been before, and no Tesla has ever been before. It could even be an alien planet. And the car will still work, still drive.” Source: CES, January 8, 2025

ELON: TESLA’S APPROACH TO SELF-DRIVING IS DIFFICULT BUT ULTIMATELY VERY POWERFUL “There already are autonomous vehicles in some regions. Waymo has autonomous vehicles with no one in it. But they're limited to a few cities in the U.S. The Tesla solution, which is a much more difficult path to go but ultimately much more powerful, is a general solution to self-driving. The Tesla software is purely AI and vision. It doesn't rely on any expensive sensors, no lidars, no radars. It doesn't even require knowing the area beforehand. You could have it drive someplace it's never been before, and no Tesla has ever been before. It could even be an alien planet. And the car will still work, still drive.” Source: CES, January 8, 2025

Mario Nawfal

5,207,896 просмотров • 1 год назад

I don't know what's changed but 5 days of clear skies has not happened here for YEARS Whatever it is... Venezuela or whatever But LONG may it continue!!!!! This is just it always used to be . Whether rainy , windy or the odd grey day The skies were clear or with normal cloud And what a difference it makes

I don't know what's changed but 5 days of clear skies has not happened here for YEARS Whatever it is... Venezuela or whatever But LONG may it continue!!!!! This is just it always used to be . Whether rainy , windy or the odd grey day The skies were clear or with normal cloud And what a difference it makes

@ChatsWithEm

16,929 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Fellow Cybertruck owners, you may want to comment with your experience, I will with mine in the reply to this post. My Cybertruck, I took delivery of on 11/04/2025, was a demo vehicle with about 500 miles on the odometer. Yes, it is a Cyberbeast, but with my previous FS CT, I drove 46,892 miles all the way to the service center on the same day I took delivery of the CT I am driving now. Tires were worn, of course but they looked still better than the ones you see in the video below. I have not been on a race track, I work from home, so the majority of miles on it are due to long distance driving. I don't do burn outs or whatever abusive behavior one can apply, my driving style has been consistently equal with both of them. When I took delivery, I was wondering a bit that the tires looked used up for only 500 miles. Long story short, here we are. The tires have been rotated as recommended every 6k miles.

Fellow Cybertruck owners, you may want to comment with your experience, I will with mine in the reply to this post. My Cybertruck, I took delivery of on 11/04/2025, was a demo vehicle with about 500 miles on the odometer. Yes, it is a Cyberbeast, but with my previous FS CT, I drove 46,892 miles all the way to the service center on the same day I took delivery of the CT I am driving now. Tires were worn, of course but they looked still better than the ones you see in the video below. I have not been on a race track, I work from home, so the majority of miles on it are due to long distance driving. I don't do burn outs or whatever abusive behavior one can apply, my driving style has been consistently equal with both of them. When I took delivery, I was wondering a bit that the tires looked used up for only 500 miles. Long story short, here we are. The tires have been rotated as recommended every 6k miles.

Andy ze German

64,095 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад