正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
I've quietly made my LayerProcGen framework public: It's a framework (C#) that can be used to implement layer-based procedural generation that's infinite, deterministic and contextual. Up for taking it for a spin? Let me know what you think! #ProcGen
10 条评论
The value of layer-based generation is not just the implementation, but also a certain way to *think* about how to define spatial dependencies for large-scale generation. I've put a lot of effort into explaining the high level concepts in the docs:
Procedurally generated open-world games tend to use "the functional approach" which essentially requires embracing sandbox gameplay. LayerProcGen points the way towards making open-world procedural games based on "the planning approach" instead. #ProcGen
Nice work, Rune. I installed it without any issues, and I had fun exploring the generated terrain. I'm studying your approach -- it looks very exciting!
Glad to hear it went smoothly! And I'd be happy to hear your thoughts when you've studied it a bit.
This is exactly what I’m researching for my current project. Thanks for sharing!
Is it likely a version of this could run on a Quest 2 with the visuals limited in quality and distance of view?
It's not a terrain generation framework; that's just one example of what it can be used for. For example, I also use it for this 2.5D platformer: So what platforms it can run on and how well depends entirely on how it's used.
Looks amazing Rune, I only hope i can find the time to give it a whirl!
Thanks! I've been using it for two of my own projects for years, but no one else have used it before so I'm welcoming feedback on what's clear or confusing, possible low hanging fruit for things that could be improved etc. :)
this is so cool!!
![Ed Dowd: "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system...[and] let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering... [and now] Bitcoin has been tied to... Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it... If you wanted to set up your own dark-money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it, I guess." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from an interview with Jesse Day (Jesse Day) posted to the Commodity Culture YouTube channel on February 28, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system. So we have the public-facing institutions, but we find out there's a layer of people above them that know how to manipulate that whole thing to their benefit through Kompromat and blackmail, and money laundering. "Let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering. That's how a lot of this stuff was. It's all dark money. And the other thing that surprised me, that I didn't. This angle I didn't think of. And again, we'll find out more, but Bitcoin has been tied to Jeffrey Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it. I don't know what to think of that and intuitively makes sense. "If you wanted to set up your own dark money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it. I guess. So, you know, there's a lot that's being revealed, and I don't, you know, I don't know what that means for Bitcoin long term, but, it certainly kind of disrupts the narrative that bitcoin is freedom. "I mean, that was kind of one of the narratives that we were hearing. And I've never been a bitcoin, bear or bull. I've always said it's a. It's a proxy for NASDAQ and liquidity trade, you know. You know, buyer beware. It's not a store of wealth. It's very volatile. So that's what it's always been to me is a volatile, you know, 95% correlated asset to the NASDAQ."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2028206232822333659/amplify_video_thumb/2028204390042288128/img/5s0WmVd0xMwFp_ze.jpg)
