Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Kelly Dever’s timeline raises an important question about how complete or incomplete the Canton PD movement logs actually are. At trial, Kelly testified she remained in her cruiser until Sgt. Goode summoned her inside to take over dispatch duty after the John O’Keefe 911 call. The movement logs appear...

17,989 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.

Grant Smith Ellis

29,789 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

In Trial 1, Trooper Proctor testified that MSP obtained John’s phone after going to Good Samaritan Hospital, and we know the next stop was Dighton, and then returning to Canton PD. That would place the phone’s retrieval after 5:30 PM, once they arrived at CPD at 5:31 PM, followed by a 30–60 minute debrief with troopers who had been at 34 Fairview. In Trial 2 Trooper Yuri testified to something very different. He says he and Proctor walked into Canton PD together at 9:15 PM, met with Sean Goode and retrieved John’s phone at that time Same phone. Same department. Two trials. Two completely different timelines. So which is it? Retrieved early evening after Good Sam? Or retrieved at 9:15 PM after a sit-down at CPD? Because both can’t be true but one has to be. And this is why timelines matter. 9:15 PM – Yuri and Proctor enter Canton PD, meet with Sean Goode, retrieve John’s phone Phone is now in MSP custody 9:15 A.M. Yuri and Proctor enter Canton PD, meet with Sean Goode, retrieve John’s phone 9:15–11:00 A.M. At Canton PD 11:00 A.M. Leave CPD 11:05–11:10 A.M. Arrive at Jen McCabe’s house 11:10 A.M.–12:00 P.M. Interview at McCabes 12:00 P.M. Leave McCabes 1:00 P.M. Arrive at Good Samaritan Hospital The data shows short clusters of steps, not long continuous walks. That fits with walking into / out of CPD moving inside a house during an interview hospital entry and hallways 11 A.M.–12 P.M. window is the key This is when the phone would be inside the McCabe home handled intermittently, mostly stationary Exactly the kind of pattern Apple Health shows.

Dixie Normus

18,977 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Candace Owens full fake conspiracy breakdown‼️ She starts by bringing up a perfectly normal location on Google Maps. This gives her audience the impression that something must be going on there because it took effort to find this place even thought it’s an airport. She then tells her audience that something feels off. Even though nothing feels off at all. This is one of Candace’s favorite tactics she just says things are weird or the vibes aren’t vibing instead of providing actual evidence. She then talks about a company having an office building as if it’s the oddest thing ever despite the fact that there are office buildings for various companies all over the world. So now having an office building is “weird” to her and “proof” that there’s a conspiracy. She says she had trouble finding the building on Google Maps so now because she doesn’t know how to properly use Google Maps this must be a conspiracy as well. The building she’s looking for is next to another building which she once again pretends is sooo weird despite the fact that there are buildings next to other buildings all over the world. Then she moves on to the next conspiracy which is that a building at the airport shares the same address as the airport. 😱 She claims the building is hidden and she had trouble locating it therefore it must be part of a conspiracy. Pulls up Google Maps and you can see the building as plain as day right out in the open nothing weird about it but she already filled her gullible audiences mind with “It’s weird and hidden” nonsense. Then she makes fake performative faces while questioning why Erika Kirk would be in that building. It’s a building at an airport I’m sure it has something to do with flights. She then says allegedly because she doesn’t even know for sure if Erika was at this totally normal building at the airport. She asks a bunch of useless questions that mean nothing to give her audience the impression that she’s doing something or that there’s some sort of mystery here worth questioning. She says that Hopkinson Aircrafts aren’t known to anybody so it must be a conspiracy despite the fact that Hopkinson Aircrafts is a well respected business know to many people that has been around for 60 years. She says that Hopkinson Aircrafts immediately felt shady to her for no reason at all this is just one of her tactics. She goes on to accuse Hopkinson Aircrafts of being a CIA front and not a real business right before bringing up their website showing that they’re a legit business. She then tries to say that this company doesn’t need an office building as if she’s the expert on how to run their business. She has nothing of substance. Nothing that would even remotely suggest a real conspiracy. So she then starts ranting about wanting to know what Erika was doing there again. Then gives her minions the order to harass Hopkinson Aircrafts. And then for her final trick… After working everyone up about this “Mysterious Obscure Building” that was a totally normal building right on in the open… After trying her best to spin a conspiracy out of nothing… Right when you think she might provide some proof, evidence, or something of value to show that this is an actual conspiracy… She immediately transitions into ranting about something else while trying to spin an entirely different conspiracy with no proof basically repeating the process that we just went through. And that ladies and gentlemen has been your Candace Owens full fake conspiracy breakdown.

Cinema Shogun

26,189 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Someone replied “There is a thing called time. One picture at one time doesn’t show another.” So I went back and reviewed all C.F. McCarthy’s footage shown at trial. During MSP Yuri Bukhenik’s and other witness testimony, video was played from Aprox 7:30 PM to just after 10:30 PM. Yuri testified the timestamp was 12 minutes behind real time. At no point in that footage do we see Heather Maxim, Ryan Nagel Richie Dauntono or even Julie Nagel! Not at the bar. Not at the tables on the left side near the bathroom, the exact spot Ryan testified they sat. In fact, many times those tables are completely empty. Heather said she drove from Ryan’s house to C.F. McCarthy’s, doesn’t remember where she parked, remembers sitting at the bar, then said Richie drove all three to the Hillside Pub. Richie testified he went to C.F. McCarthy’s to meet Heather and Ryan, said they sat at the bar, stayed a couple hours, then he drove all three to Hillside until around midnight. Ryan testified they were at C.F. McCarthy’s 2–3 hours, sat at the tables near the bathroom, then went to Hillside and left around midnight and that Richie dropped Heather and Ryan back at Ryan’s house. That places them at C.F. McCarthy’s roughly 9–11 PM, the same window Karen and John were there and the same footage used by the Commonwealth to count Karen’s drinks. Ryan Nagel testified about going to C.F. McCarthy’s to meet his sister NOT 1 TIME BUT 2x Those are two different sequences, and sequence matters. We know Ryan’s sister was at 34 Fairview later that night. That means an investigator Like YURI should have immediately asked, If Ryan went to the bar to meet his sister, how did she get there? If he met her there, who arrived first? What time did she leave the bar? Once surveillance is used to place Karen Read, track John O’Keefe, and count drinks, it should also be used to exclude or challenge other claimed presences. Yet across hours of video, adjusted for timestamp error, none of them appear. Heather testified she drove from Ryan’s house, doesn’t remember where she parked, later left with Ryan and Richie, and was dropped back at Ryan’s house. That implies her car was left somewhere during a blizzard, either on the street or Walgreens lot, yet no follow-up questions were asked about retrieving it, and no effort appears to have been made to anchor that to time, snow, or location. If Bukhenik acknowledged these witnesses are not on video when they say they are, Ryan’s story about his sister shifts, and transportation accounts don’t align, then investigators would be required to revisit timelines, re-interview witnesses, reassess credibility, and potentially adjust conclusions about later events. That’s real work…..So this isn’t “one picture at one time.” It’s hours of surveillance relied on, for other witnesses where this group is simply absent. With civil litigation still ahead, these gaps matter.

Dixie Normus

14,415 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Gather real close for this one, because every time Jen McCabe testifies about January 30th, her story doesn’t just “change”… it shape-shifts. Two trials, three versions, and one cell tower that refuses to play along. Jen and Kerry leave the O’Keefe home, go to Michael Lank’s house. Lank’s wife magically pops out, gets in the car, consoles Kerry, they talk “maybe an hour.” Jen “I might have run in to use the bathroom.” “The car was running.” “Kerry’s a talker.” Tully asks if she’d been to Lank’s: First “NO. Never been to his house.” Then“Oh my gosh, yes, I did go there!” Then Alan Jackson asks the one question everyone in Canton has wondered “Why did you stop at 34 FAIRVIEW before going to Lank’s?” Jen’s answer (yes, all real) “We didn’t stop.” Maybe we slowed down.”“That’s the way to Lank’s house.” Except… it isn’t. This is Canton, not Narnia. 34 Fairview is not a shortcut to Lanks house from Meadows Ave unless your GPS runs on fairy dust and perjury. In the 2nd trial, Suddenly the whole timeline rearranges, Now they “left Meadows” first. THEN they “dropped Lexi off” at Lank’s. Jen has a “faint memory” of going inside “just to pee.” Amazing how a faint memory is bright enough to recall a bathroom break but too dim to remember an entire route through Canton. Then comes the moment every liar dreads: the phone records hit the courtroom. Here’s what ACTUALLY happened on January 30th: 12:13 PM Jen at her house (County Lane) 12:19 PM Jen at John O’Keefe’s house and here’s where it turns into a movie Because at 4:45 PM, Trooper Proctor calls her for 9 minutes and 43 seconds The EXACT kind of call you make when you’re all on the “don’t text” diet. 5:21 PM Jen leaves County Lane. 5:36 PM SHE GOES TO 34 FAIRVIEW Let me say that again for the people in the back: She goes to the Albert/McCabe crime scene house AGAIN. This is NOT in her testimony. This is NOT in any version of her story. This is NOT on the way to Meadows or Lank’s. She STAYS for 4 minutes. Funny how the GPS remembers the stop she “didn’t make.” 5:43 PM NOW she goes to LANK’S. Suddenly her “bathroom stop” makes a whole lot more sense. 6:34 PM Home. This is the REAL route: County Lane → 34 Fairview → Lank’s → Home Not ONE of her stories include the most important stop. Her sworn testimony: “We never stopped at 34 Fairview.” “We didn’t go back.” “We only dropped off Lexi.” “I’ve never been to Lank’s… oh wait yes I have.” Her ACTUAL phone data: She went to Fairview AGAIN After a 10-minute call with Proctor Stayed 4 minutes Then went to Lank’s This matches every other off-phones, off-text, off-the-books meeting these witnesses had And somehow… No one in law enforcement questioned the fact that she was at 34 Fairview on Jan 30th? The day AFTER John O’Keefe died? For 4 minutes? After speaking to Trooper Proctor? If you scripted this for TV, people would say it’s too obvious. This isn’t a timeline. This is a cleanup route. This is why witnesses are now launching anonymous GoFundMes and fake Iceland websites. This is why half the town won’t speak on record. This is why every testimony contradicts the last. This is why the house defendants needed two trials to “remember” who was where. And this is the kind of thing that destroys the public’s trust in an ENTIRE town. The fate of Canton doesn’t rest on whether people “like” Karen Read. It rests on whether the TRUTH can survive these ever-mutating timelines. And thanks to cold hard cell data? The truth is knocking. LOUD.

Dixie Normus

21,516 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: An unknown force within the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office has edited a video in the public records production released just moments ago related to the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case. The edit was done to obfuscate footage of the Mystery Man, who carries something away from the taillight area of Karen's Lexus in the footage, and the proof is plain as day! The newly-released Sallyport video contains upwards of 12 jump cuts at the precise moment when the Mystery Man appears behind Karen's Lexus in the aforementioned Canton Police Department Sallyport. The new video also contains the exact same yellow-blur box that was visible in the original video provided to Karen's legal team during discovery in the John O'Keefe trials. As such, that means this video has been edited twice (the first time when it was provided to Karen's team and the second time when this public records request was filled late Friday afternoon), and, further, that both series of edits were specifically designed to obfuscate the identity of the Mystery Man in question. The Mystery Man is seen standing near former State Trooper Michael Proctor --who is currently in the news due to his disgusting and bigoted text messages with former Canton Police Officer Sean Goode being made public-- in the area of Karen's taillight at 5:38PM ET (this taillight would show up, just minutes later circa 5:45PM ET, broken and scattered on the lawn of a home in Canton, Massachusetts, where John O'Keefe's body was discovered earlier that morning). Of note, in some of the newly released Proctorgate messages, Proctor discusses "planting cocaine" on suspects. Read more background on the Proctor/Goode files here - Karen Read, for her part, was acquitted on criminal charges related to John's death after two trials and, now, Karen has filed a civil lawsuit against the State Police and the Town Of Canton related to, what Karen alleges, was a bad-faith investigation of John's death that intentionally focused on Karen to the exclusion of all other suspects. In turn, the Mystery Man, and his identity, may end up playing a key role in that ongoing civil case. To this day, John O'Keefe's death remains unsolved. For context: Previously, on February 17, 2026, I reported; I believe I have found conclusive proof that the Canton Police Department Sallyport video from 5:38pm ET on 1/29/2022 involving Karen Read's Lexus was edited and, furthermore, an unknown man carried something away from the area of Karen's car near her right rear taillight. Read that report here - I then reported, that same day, the following: Here is the cleaned up footage from the Canton PD Sallyport at 5:38pm ET on 1/29/2022. It is clear that this video was manipulated with a yellow blur box to obfuscate the identity and movements of a mystery man standing with Michael Proctor near Karen Read's right rear taillight. Read that report here - Find more follow up reporting here - CC: The Trial Channel , Kyle Sharkey, Emily See, Didi, Corri Hopkins. David Yannetti. Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP

Grant Smith Ellis

209,261 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NEW: If you missed it this morning, I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) used to run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.

Grant Smith Ellis

55,665 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

According to Sgt. Sean Goode’s report from the morning of January 29, 2022, Jennifer McCabe said she saw Karen and John pull up, saw the passenger door open, they never came inside, and then the car drove away. That is not a vague impression. That is a very specific observation. Because if you are standing at the front door, looking out into the dark, and you can see a passenger door open, that generally means the dome light comes on. Interior light. Movement. Visibility. It’s not exactly subtle. Yet somehow, when trial rolls around, the open door detail evaporates. Just gone. No big deal. Must have slipped everyone’s mind. Now enter Ryan Nagel. He testifies he arrived around 12:23 a.m., texted his sister outside, waited about five minutes, and then left. That 12:23 timestamp matters. Months later, Jen asks Julie Nagel for a screenshot of the text between Julie and Ryan showing that arrival time. She admits she asked for it. She knew Julie was a witness. The screenshot reflected the exact time Ryan pulled up. The only reason we even know about this request is because of phone extraction. And she isn’t sure whether she ever gave that screenshot to law enforcement, because someone deleted that screenshot. At the same time, she testifies she does not have an independent recollection of the exact time and says she was not looking at her watch. Except she was actively texting. And phones tend to display the time. Constantly. Every text has a timestamp right there on the screen. You do not need a Rolex to know what time it is when you are sending messages. So on one hand we get I don’t recall the time. On the other hand, we get a later effort to obtain documentary confirmation of the time. Apparently she cannot remember what time it was, but she knows it was important enough to chase down a screenshot months later. And let’s circle back to jen… If someone is watching closely enough in the dark to see a passenger door open and, by implication, a dome light activate, then they are watching closely. Close enough to notice light. Movement. A door. But not close enough to have any sense of timing while holding a phone that literally displays the time on its face. Now back to Ryan’s timeline. the story of his night shifts between Trial 1 and Trial 2. In Trial 1, the sequence was CF McCarthy’s, then Hillside Pub across town, then 34 Fairview. In Trial 2, his evening is presented as going from CF McCarthy’s to 34 Fairview. Hillside Pub is not mentioned. Same witness. Same night. Different routing. Then there is the sister issue. In Trial 1, he references his sister being at CF McCarthy’s twice. In Trial 2, he references her there once. But she was already at 34 Fairview. So now we are left asking whether she was ever at McCarthy’s that night, whether he misspoke, or why Hillside quietly disappears the second time around. None of that automatically equals deception. People misspeak. Memories shift. Trials are stressful. But when details appear, disappear, and rearrange themselves depending on which courtroom you are in, it does raise eyebrows. Especially when the original observation was specific enough to include seeing a passenger door open in the dark. Just not what time it was... and where did that pesky screenshot vanish to??????

Dixie Normus

17,499 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce