Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Massive new vitamin D study just dropped — and it’s getting zero mainstream attention A 4-year trial with 25,000 adults across the US (led by 140 researchers) found: Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly preserved telomere length (only 1 year of aging in 4 years). This follows a 10-year Canadian study...

1,975,332 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

37 Comments

Camus's profile picture
Camus9 months ago

Credit: @ThePulseMarcel;

biofeedback369's profile picture
biofeedback3699 months ago

Did you know that old hospitals used to have sun decks? Humans are biological batteries. The sun charges us electromagnetically. Their emitted rays cover all color spectra and thus have incredibly healing effects on our body and psyche. In addition, the sun is also connected to our soul. —— PDF & Book:

RoviHere's profile picture
RoviHere9 months ago

The fact that a study involving 25,000 adults showing a 75% reduction in the aging process is getting "zero mainstream attention" is a massive indictment of our current health information system. Preserving telomere length is the holy grail of longevity, yet the focus remains on reactive rather than proactive care. It’s becoming increasingly clear that we must take our biological destiny into our own hands. ☀️🧬 ​Is the suppression of simple, effective nutritional science the biggest health scandal of our time? @hubermanlab

AtlSteel's profile picture
AtlSteel9 months ago

Here is a link to the study summary. Dosage was 2,000 IU/day.

whatsupfranks's profile picture
whatsupfranks9 months ago

@grok look up this study referenced in the video and tell me the results and any missing context and if the study has any massive flaws or not.

Grok's profile picture
Grok9 months ago

The study in the video is the VITAL-Telomere substudy (AJCN, 2025), a randomized trial of 1,054 adults (from larger VITAL's 25k). Results: 2000 IU/day vitamin D3 reduced telomere attrition by ~140 bp over 4 years vs placebo, preserving length (linked to less biological aging). Missing context: Substudy size is smaller than claimed; telomeres are an aging proxy, not definitive. Canadian dementia study (2023, observational, 12k participants) showed 40% lower risk with vitamin D, but association only. Flaws: VITAL substudy limited by sample; potential selection bias. Dementia study confounded, not causal. No massive flaws, but results need replication. (347 chars)

VICTOR COLE's profile picture
VICTOR COLE9 months ago

@WhatsupFranks @newstart_2024 @Grok how much vitamin D is safe?

Grok's profile picture
Grok9 months ago

The recommended daily vitamin D intake for most adults is 600 IU (15 mcg), or 800 IU (20 mcg) if over 70, per Mayo Clinic and NIH guidelines. The safe upper limit is 4,000 IU (100 mcg) per day to avoid toxicity risks like nausea, kidney damage, or hypercalcemia. Doses up to 2,000 IU are often used in studies without issues, but consult a doctor for your needs.

Kevin Walter ☦️'s profile picture
Kevin Walter ☦️9 months ago

@hoakeyokie @WhatsupFranks @newstart_2024 I've read the largest dose.studied long term to be safe is 10,000 IU per day. Is that correct?

Grok's profile picture
Grok9 months ago

Studies show 10,000 IU/day vitamin D3 has been safely used long-term, like in a 3-year Calgary trial (with mild hypercalcemia in 9% that resolved). However, higher doses up to 50,000 IU/day for up to 7 years were deemed safe in a 2019 study of hospitalized patients, with no adverse events. General safe upper limit is 4,000 IU/day per NIH; higher needs monitoring. Consult a doctor.

Banjo Picker's profile picture
Banjo Picker9 months ago

@walter_kev96767 @hoakeyokie @WhatsupFranks @newstart_2024 What does the average human create per day at the equator vs the northern latitudes l?

Grok's profile picture
Grok9 months ago

At the equator, average adults can synthesize 4,000–10,000 IU of vitamin D daily from 10–15 minutes of midday sun exposure (arms/legs/face) year-round, depending on skin type (darker needs more time). In northern latitudes (>40°N), production is ~0 IU in winter due to low UVB; in summer, similar amounts require 15–30+ minutes. Factors: season, cloud cover, clothing, and skin pigmentation. Source: NIH study.

Vishal 🇮🇳's profile picture
Vishal 🇮🇳9 months ago

Vitamin D supplementation are pointless as 95% is not absorbed. better way spnd 20 ins in Sun when UVB rays are at peak! (10:00 am-2:00 PM) 4 days a week

feedmesushi (Patricia)'s profile picture
feedmesushi (Patricia)9 months ago

Part of the problem has been sunscreen. We need natural sunlight, and we don't need to slather ourselves up with that toxic goop.

Rabbi Handler's profile picture
Rabbi Handler9 months ago

VITAMIN D3 MUST ALWAYS BE ACCOMPANIED BY K2 TO PREVENT ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM IN THE JOINTS AND ARTERIES.—K2 KEEPS CALCIUM MOVING TO WHERE IT BELONGS!—BUY D3 AND K2 COMBINATION TO GET THE RIGHT BALANCE!

AnaK 4 Now ⭐️'s profile picture
AnaK 4 Now ⭐️9 months ago

Telomeres can be reversed 'once they shortened'.

Circadian Savage's profile picture
Circadian Savage9 months ago

Vitamin D should be made via UVB and Cholesterol so you start the endocrine hormone synthesis. We are bombarded by blue light which ruins melanopsin and liberates Vitamin A. Liberated Vitamin A destroys lipid rafts and cell membranes, and with a skewed Vitamin A, the supplemented Vitamin D WON'T RAISE your Vitamin D levels

The Edge Protocol's profile picture
The Edge Protocol9 months ago

Since I take 10000 units daily my overall health increases significantly. Needless to say vitamin D is a game changer

Alan Dail's profile picture
Alan Dail9 months ago

Telomeres can be lengthened

Texas Warrior Kimm Schuman's profile picture
Texas Warrior Kimm Schuman9 months ago

Supplements are SYNTHETIC GARBAGE!!! Get in the SUN! Sun entering the EYES creates an immune response also! Ditch the sunscreen and sunglasses!

Goodfriendwg's profile picture
Goodfriendwg9 months ago

Take it every day. Take with a k2 combination. So important.

We See You's profile picture
We See You9 months ago

@CtTaphouse What’s synthetic D3 made from? Typically lanolin, a fatty substance sheep secrete to condition their wool. Is it the active ingredient in some rat poisons? Yes, cholecalciferol from lanolin is. Go outside and get some sun.☀️

Mary G Martis's profile picture
Mary G Martis9 months ago

I heard that cancer patients had low levels of Vitamin D.

Anagha Deshmukh's profile picture
Anagha Deshmukh9 months ago

Vitamin D is a prohormone. One that assists in breast health, prostrate health( prevention of cancers of these organs) bone health, heart health, immune health, musculoskeletal health. It is also a regulator of receptor biology in our body for neurotransmitters hence the psychological wellbeing aspect of Vitamin D. ACE2 receptor physiology is also influenced by Vitamin D No brainer for sure to keep those vitamin D levels up in the higher range.

ChetTheJet's profile picture
ChetTheJet9 months ago

Another factoid: Magnesium plus vitamin D plus vitamin K2 is required for bone calcium absorption. Magnesium is needed for vitamin D absorption, and vitamin D + K2 facilitates calcium absorption in the intestines, which is a prerequisite for calcium to be utilized by bones.

Saddam Neet Hodlssein 🏴‍☠️'s profile picture
Saddam Neet Hodlssein 🏴‍☠️9 months ago

Epithalon conclusively lengthens telomeres. And D3 is the active ingredient in rat poison. Getting raw sun exposure is exponentially better.

arubaraif's profile picture
arubaraif9 months ago

The elephant in the room was Sunscreen and whether it causes Vit D deficiency. Now we know it does. Best to seek shade when hot rather than slap more cream on

Helen. 🤔's profile picture
Helen. 🤔9 months ago

Dr Vernon Coleman wrote about this May 2020 Here is a snippet

Mark Patterson's profile picture
Mark Patterson9 months ago

Telomerase re-lengthens telomeres. The best natural approach for this is Gotu Kola.

Suzzie Wong's profile picture
Suzzie Wong9 months ago

went to the journal you mentioned. only studies I could find state: could extend telomere life, but studies are needed. If you post this clip, why on earth would you not include the link to the study you are referring to? Seriously? leaves this post worthless, at best

The Royal Commentator USA's profile picture
The Royal Commentator USA9 months ago

The telemore shortening is not the causal effect of cancer or aging and D3 is not the cure all. I worked in clinical studies, I do not agree this is the take on these studies. Sorry.

J's profile picture
J9 months ago

been taking Vitamin D for many years. If a person chooses to study nutrition then will better understand its importance!

Rexus Eternem's profile picture
Rexus Eternem9 months ago

Every day I read here on X posts that Vitamin D is rat poison and it'll make you die from arteriesclerosis 🤔

Me & you plus this dog named Blue.'s profile picture
Me & you plus this dog named Blue.9 months ago

My daily is 10000IU of D3 with 200MCG of K2. It does make a difference. It's important to take the D3 combined with K2 at higher levels.

Little Miss Word Salad -Chloe - #BootChloeOut2026's profile picture
Little Miss Word Salad -Chloe - #BootChloeOut20269 months ago

take it daily, have for several years

Guito Wingfield MD's profile picture
Guito Wingfield MD9 months ago

This is great news!!!! The end results of all health related intervention related to longevity is to maintain or some day to lengthen the telomeres. I have taken 6000 units of D3 daily for the past 15 years. Yearly blood levels is needed to adjust the dose, 50-70 is ideal. The KEYSTONE of longevity is to decrease SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION which shorten the telomeres and speeds up aging. Vit. D function also as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. You potentiate and leverage that effect with other antioxidants, anti-inflammatory diet, exercise and lower stress.

Pii™Ducks's profile picture
Pii™Ducks9 months ago

wild if true, fren

Related Videos

Vitamin D supplementation was associated with a 40% lower risk of dementia over a decade. After five years, 84% of supplement users were dementia-free compared to just 68% of non-users in a study of over 12,000 people. Vitamin D reduced dementia risk by 33% in adults with mild cognitive impairment or APOE e4, a key genetic risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. Vitamin D isn’t just a vitamin—it's a steroid hormone regulating over 2,000 genes critical for brain development, neuroplasticity, and inflammation control. Its roles include clearing amyloid beta plaques and tau buildup, boosting neuron survival via neurotrophic factors like BDNF, and enhancing brain connectivity, particularly when paired with exercise. It’s no surprise, then, that higher vitamin D levels are associated with better cognition, larger hippocampal volume, and lower Alzheimer’s risk. Multiple lines of evidence support this. More than 30 large studies have consistently linked low vitamin D levels to a 50–150% increased dementia risk. People genetically prone to low vitamin D—those with genetic variations affecting vitamin D production or metabolism—have a 54% higher dementia risk. Furthermore, supplementing with 800 IU/day of vitamin D improves memory and cognitive function in people with mild cognitive impairment and more serious forms of dementia. To learn more about optimizing vitamin D levels for cognitive health, including underlying brain-protective mechanisms and practical supplementation protocols, see the latest FoundMyFitness video. Link in comments.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

245,660 views • 1 year ago

High dose vitamin D supplementation might be doing more harm than good. Stephanie Seneff, MIT researcher: Vitamin D is a signalling molecule, not a nutrient to megadose. It mobilizes calcium — but doesn't control where calcium goes. High dose vitamin D drives calcium into the arteries, leaching it from bones. A 3-year study comparing 400 IU/day, 4,000 IU/day and 10,000 IU/day found the highest dose group had statistically significantly worse bone mineral density. A 2006 study found that calcitriol supplementation (the active form of vitamin D) in young adults with kidney disease increased artery calcification — because calcitriol is taken up directly by cells in the artery wall. Artery calcification is one of the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular disease. An Indian study compared vitamin D supplementation to 20 minutes of daily sunlight in 100 men with severe deficiency. Remarkably — the supplement group had a larger increase in serum vitamin D than the sunlight group. Yet opposite effects on cholesterol: Sunlight group — cholesterol dropped. Supplement group — cholesterol increased. Why? Sunlight and vitamin D supplements take completely different routes through your body. Vitamin D supplements are fat-soluble. The liver has to synthesize cholesterol and release LDL particles just to transport them through the blood. Sunlight stimulates cholesterol sulfate synthesis directly in the skin. The sulfate component makes the molecule water-soluble — transported freely in the blood without being packaged inside an LDL particle. Because cholesterol sulfate is both water-soluble and fat-soluble, it can transfer from skin cell membranes to HDL particles or red blood cells and deliver cholesterol directly to tissues that need it. No LDL carrier required. When you get vitamin D from a supplement instead of the sun, you don't get the simultaneous increase in cholesterol sulfate. The pill doesn't just fail to replicate sunlight. It uses a completely different biological pathway. Seneff: "Vitamin D wants to be subtle. Get out in the sun." "People answer: oh yeah I know, vitamin D is important." "No. Not vitamin D. The sun.” Vitamin D is a proxy for sunlight exposure. The proxy isn't the mechanism.

no.mind

244,287 views • 6 months ago

Vitamin D mistake A Statistical Error in the Estimation of the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D (2014) US, nearly 15 times too low UK, 0ver 22 times too low IOM calculation 600 units (15 mcg), 97.5% of people will achieve 63 nmol/L (25.2 ng/ml) Correct calculation 600 units (15 mcg), 97.5% of people will achieve 26.8 nmol/L (10.7 ng/ml) Requirements based on correct calculation 8,895 IU of vitamin D per day may be needed to accomplish that 97.5% of individuals achieve serum 25(OH)D values of 50 nmol/L or more. The "Average" vs. "Individual" Mistake Canada studies Diet gives 232 IU of vitamin D per day Institute of Medicine (IOM), RDA vitamin D 600 IU per day, (aged 1 to 70 years) Now called the National Academy of Medicine UK is even worse 400 iu or 10 mcg 600 iu per day to achieve serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels of 50 nmol/L or more in 97.5% of healthy individuals. Levels of 50 nmol/L or more have been shown to benefit bone health and to prevent disease and injury. The IOM based their RDA for vitamin D on an aggregation of 10 supplementation studies, (32 dose protocols) carried out during winter months, at locations above 50th parallel IOM regressed the 32 study averages, dose: plasma ratio On the basis of this, IOM estimated that 600 IU of vitamin D would achieve an average 25(OH)D level of 63 nmol/L Requirements based on correct calculation 8,895 IU of vitamin D per day This dose is well in excess of the current RDA of 600 IU per day and the tolerable upper intake of 4000 IU per day. The public health and clinical implications of the miscalculated RDA for vitamin D are serious. With the current recommendation of 600 IU, bone health objectives and disease and injury prevention targets will not be met. We recommend that the RDA for vitamin D be reconsidered to allow for appropriate public health and clinical decision-making. The Big Vitamin D Mistake Explanation of the statistical error The "Average" vs. "Individual" Mistake The Institute of Medicine’s goal was to find a vitamin D dose that ensures 97.5% of individual people reach a healthy blood level (50 nmol/L). The statistical error occurred because the IOM analysed the averages of different studies rather than the data of individual participants. They looked at 10 studies and took the average blood levels achieved in those studies. They calculated a statistical range (Confidence Interval) based on those averages. They found that with 600 IU, 97.5% of the study averages would hit the target. The Problem There is much less variation between "averages" than there is between "individuals." By using the averages, the IOM accidentally "smoothed out" the data. They assumed that if the average person in a study was fine, then almost everyone was fine. The Classroom Analogy Imagine you want to ensure every student passes a test. The IOM method They looked at the average scores of 30 different classrooms. They set a curriculum so that 97.5% of classrooms would have a passing average. The Reality Even in a classroom with a passing average, there are students who fail. The Correction To ensure 97.5% of students pass, you have to look at the lowest-performing students, not the class average. The Consequence When the authors of this paper re-calculated the numbers using the variation of individuals (rather than study averages), they found that the current RDA of 600 IU does not cover 97.5% of the population. Instead, it only ensures that 97.5% of people reach a blood level of 26.8 nmol/L (far below the target of 50 nmol/L). To actually get 97.5% of the population to the healthy target of 50 nmol/L, the math suggests you would need a dose of 8,895 IU per day.

Jordan Chain

17,400 views • 10 months ago