Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
NATE SILVER JOINS THE ALL-IN INTERVIEW! Nate Silver — statistician, gambler, Silver Bulletin Substacker — joins @jason david friedberg for an hour on data, elections & what's coming -- The LA election breakdown: late mail-in ballot surge, ballot harvesting, and what the stats actually show -- Partisanship is political... show more
128,310 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)
33 Comments

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg He can be the greatest statistician etc etc but he simply can't see the anomaly in the CA elections. No wonder his 538 is useless now.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Nate Silver? Why not have Jim Cramer on next.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Had to immediately turn this off when @NateSilver538 tried to explain away the statistically impossible, yet magical jump in votes for Raman exclusively in post-election-day cohorts. Rediculous.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Fifteen minutes of this was enough for me. Friedberg's questions were insightful, Silver's answers were not.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg I love The All in podcast. After skipping most of the Knicks stuff, i listened for 10 min before turning it off. The only thing i took away from it, is that no one should ever take @NateSilver538 serious.
Wow. At 10:50 “no evidence of fraud”. How about evidence to subvert the will of the voters? The measure to increase the sales tax (to 10.25% !) was losing by 6 percentage points on election night, only to pass by 0.5% one week later. That’s evidence of the machine protecting its revenue stream.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg He's literally a paid Democratic pollster. It's sad because he's so knowledgeable.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Silver is so biased. Difficult to listen to.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Hi @NateSilver538 Regime Change CA RED... 2028 RUBIO WILL WIN MARK IT

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Friedberg : Is it possible there’s election fraud in CA ? Silver: The votes are verified Jason: Heritage Foundation says it’s negligible Me : 🫠

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg This is one episode I will not watch. Thanks!

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Silver hasn't been relevant since 2012.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Hoping to hear anything about the early-late Nithya Raman-Karen Bass voting pattern discrepancy? Don't bother (despite the question being posed twice).

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Wow

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Not your best work. Jason is not the right person to condict this interview. First, there aren’t as many Knicks fans as Knicks fans think there are. Second, Silver has particularly strong opinions which is not the trait which makes one trust his polls. But, Jason likes him.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Was it me or did Friedberg say out loud that he did not think homeless people should be participating in public elections?

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg I don't understand @friedberg holding on to this theory that it's a democratic establishment conspiracy... Bass polled WAY better head to head against Pratt than she did Raman. The democratic "ground game" establishment would want Pratt!

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg He is annoying

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg No wonder polling is never reliable. I really didn’t hear a cohesive sentence from this guy. He never gave Friedberg an answer as to why the late ballots broke for Nithya.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Oh good lord

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Nate had to lie. It’s ridiculous to think he would not lie. If he actually told the truth; that the California elections are absolutely full of fraud, legal and illegal, the left would destroy him. All-in should not participate in the lie by giving him a platform to a lie.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg I would like to personally thank Nate Silver for explaining to these right wing conspiracy Joe Rogan clone dipshits that there is no fraud in our elections - just because you “believe” the data doesn’t “feel” right doesn’t mean shit. Get Friedberg some therapy

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg 这阵容听着挺硬核的

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Nate Silver on LA ballots is interesting but the late-counting pattern is genuinely strange. No one explains it well yet, not even him 🤷♂

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg This pod and channel are turning into Joe Rogan. You dipshits commenting here realize Nate is a respected statistician and political analyst who graduated from U Chicago and makes a living in facts and data? You morons just want to believe whatever MAGA tells you despite reality

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg i can't believe you guys @chamath @friedberg @Jason @DavidSacks allowed this.... lying piece of shit @NateSilver538 on the pod. fck you nate silver.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Yes, the LA election had no fraud whatsoever...probably the most secure and safest voting method ever anywhere in the world. Nate Silver sounded very confident when he said he didn't think there were fraud.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg Nate Silver giving off intense pedo vibes here, what is that dude up to?

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg All-In haha!! Nate Silver what a loser. He definitely a Vegas lizard now.

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg What a joke Jason, David F and Nate are. They are Left…left..,left!!! Socialist love Communism because the rich get Richer and it ends the middle class and below! 🖕

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg nice. Will listen to it later

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg On his politics I wasted my time!

@NateSilver538 @Jason @friedberg The guy at the bottom is still seriously saying the LA election was fraudulent? Get a life 🤣🤣
