Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Nic Carter explains the most contentious part of Bitcoin's quantum problem: who gets the 2.5M coins that can't migrate? "The worst case is someone that is not a friendly secretly recovers all those coins. And then in a space of 10 blocks, broadcasts transactions spending all those coins to... show more
27,738 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
17 Kommentare

@Delphi_Digital That is some cheap fud right there

@intangiblecoins: Correct me if Im wrong but aren’t Satoshi coins in like 20,000 different addresses? How then can one assume “this happens all at once”?

bro wants this to happen so badly

This blip seems all so disingenuous. Not really interested in watching the rest. I wish Nick well. Need people to ask these questions, I guess. He seems to be really working fear hard to generate some business.

recommend the rest i think he gave a very honest/objective take about his most likely scenario vs the worst case scenario he's very clear that he doesn't expect the worst case to happen and i agree with him that having people think about this + prepare is positive

How likely is that worst case?

and then it’s over and we recover. Nic is a bitch.

imagine waking up to satoshi dumping on the market in ten blocks flat

Burn those coins easy

That 10 block window is terrifyingly short for a coordinated attack.

I can’t hear anything over that terrible mustache

good conversation

great podcast man pump out some more

thank u sir next one drops tomorrow

@dmweisberger lol.. best in class... Lol.. new serious chain don't have this issue. Most secure chain lol

Well this was insightful

So the "why" of the worst case described here is that the temporary illiquidity craters price and there's a crisis of confidence that leads to BTC price being impaired for some period of time, is that right?
