正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Ocean Heat Source 05: Adiabatic compression doesn’t explain the deep ocean warming observation. Test type: Empirical, an audit of the Johnson 2026 data product and calculation workflow. The idea is basically this..as water sinks, the pressure rises and warms its in situ temperature a little, even without adding heat....

stephXskystory's profile picture

Stephanie Buchanan

2,486 subscribers

36,316 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ocean Heat Source 08: 📢Antarctic Bottom Water and overturning don’t explain the magnitude of the abyssal warming acceleration. Test type: Empirical, data-constrained model comparison This one reminded me how important quantitation is... Antarctic Bottom Water is real, and at first, it actually looked like a surprisingly good match to the abyssal warming signal. The density structure matched surprisingly well. The pathway was plausible. Then, I calculated how much warming acceleration the overturning circulation can actually supply. ECCO produces only ~2% of the observed 4-6 kdbar acceleration. So AABW/overturning may contribute, but it fails as the dominant quantitative explanation. I’m now down to the final 2 mechanisms! We’re getting close to narrowing this down. Next, I’m testing the geothermal/hydrothermal heating mechanism. Details:
0:36

Ocean Heat Source 08: 📢Antarctic Bottom Water and overturning don’t explain the magnitude of the abyssal warming acceleration. Test type: Empirical, data-constrained model comparison This one reminded me how important quantitation is... Antarctic Bottom Water is real, and at first, it actually looked like a surprisingly good match to the abyssal warming signal. The density structure matched surprisingly well. The pathway was plausible. Then, I calculated how much warming acceleration the overturning circulation can actually supply. ECCO produces only ~2% of the observed 4-6 kdbar acceleration. So AABW/overturning may contribute, but it fails as the dominant quantitative explanation. I’m now down to the final 2 mechanisms! We’re getting close to narrowing this down. Next, I’m testing the geothermal/hydrothermal heating mechanism. Details:

Stephanie Buchanan

18,222 次观看 • 1 个月前

A peer-reviewed study finds that most of the temperature rise observed over the past century in the US isn't from greenhouse gases, but instead from roads, buildings and parking lots. By comparing raw US temperature data from stations in areas with different population densities, the study found that 65% of the warming since 1895 is explained by the urban heat island effect, and another 8% by urban growth into once-rural areas. That's nearly three quarters of the warming, with no CO2 involved. Crucially, NOAA's adjusted data hides this effect. Homogenization smooths it out, a process the study's author, Dr Roy Spencer, calls "urban blending." It's not "global warming," it's urbanization.
0:44

A peer-reviewed study finds that most of the temperature rise observed over the past century in the US isn't from greenhouse gases, but instead from roads, buildings and parking lots. By comparing raw US temperature data from stations in areas with different population densities, the study found that 65% of the warming since 1895 is explained by the urban heat island effect, and another 8% by urban growth into once-rural areas. That's nearly three quarters of the warming, with no CO2 involved. Crucially, NOAA's adjusted data hides this effect. Homogenization smooths it out, a process the study's author, Dr Roy Spencer, calls "urban blending." It's not "global warming," it's urbanization.

Electroverse

35,203 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ocean Heat Source 09: The dominant source is either a) geothermal/hydrothermal heating from below, or b) electromagnetic induction. Here’s where I’m at with the five mechanisms I’m testing to explain the abyssal warming acceleration: 1. adiabatic compression: closed 2. isopycnal heave: quantified; observationally limited 3. AABW/overturning: closed as the dominant quantitative explanation 4. geothermal/hydrothermal: in progress, looking weak as the dominant explanation, closing two loopholes... 5. electromagnetic induction: solver in development, strongest remaining hypothesis Two mechanisms closed. One ran into the limits of the observations. Two left to test... We're closing in.
0:42

Ocean Heat Source 09: The dominant source is either a) geothermal/hydrothermal heating from below, or b) electromagnetic induction. Here’s where I’m at with the five mechanisms I’m testing to explain the abyssal warming acceleration: 1. adiabatic compression: closed 2. isopycnal heave: quantified; observationally limited 3. AABW/overturning: closed as the dominant quantitative explanation 4. geothermal/hydrothermal: in progress, looking weak as the dominant explanation, closing two loopholes... 5. electromagnetic induction: solver in development, strongest remaining hypothesis Two mechanisms closed. One ran into the limits of the observations. Two left to test... We're closing in.

Stephanie Buchanan

13,645 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.
0:50

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.

Electroverse

13,304 次观看 • 7 个月前

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.
6:40

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.

Robin Monotti

44,083 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: You can transform Mars into an Earth-like planet, just warm it up. There’s a fast way and a slow way. The fast way is to drop thermonuclear weapons over the poles Mars is cold and hostile because it lacks a thick atmosphere. To make it more Earth-like, the first requirement is simple in theory: warm the planet. If enough heat is added, frozen carbon dioxide at the poles could sublimate into the atmosphere, increasing pressure and strengthening the greenhouse effect. This could trigger a feedback loop where warming releases more gas, leading to further warming.
0:24

Elon Musk: You can transform Mars into an Earth-like planet, just warm it up. There’s a fast way and a slow way. The fast way is to drop thermonuclear weapons over the poles Mars is cold and hostile because it lacks a thick atmosphere. To make it more Earth-like, the first requirement is simple in theory: warm the planet. If enough heat is added, frozen carbon dioxide at the poles could sublimate into the atmosphere, increasing pressure and strengthening the greenhouse effect. This could trigger a feedback loop where warming releases more gas, leading to further warming.

SMX 🇺🇸

370,895 次观看 • 8 个月前

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."
2:19

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

Robin Monotti

112,747 次观看 • 1 年前

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.
0:39

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

35,724 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is a Bitcoin mining heated driveway snow melt system. So far, its the biggest I'm aware of. It's about 300' long and utilizes 12 S21 Pro machines in immersion fluid, which heat glycol through a set of brazed plate heat exchangers. The 3/4" PEX is closely spaced and uninsulated so that it has maximum efficiency as a heat dump for mining ops, when desired. It also allows the machines to run at their lowest practical temperature to meet the utilitarian purpose..... snow melt, home heat, and water pre-heating. This mining system is a heat core with amazing secondary uses.
0:39

This is a Bitcoin mining heated driveway snow melt system. So far, its the biggest I'm aware of. It's about 300' long and utilizes 12 S21 Pro machines in immersion fluid, which heat glycol through a set of brazed plate heat exchangers. The 3/4" PEX is closely spaced and uninsulated so that it has maximum efficiency as a heat dump for mining ops, when desired. It also allows the machines to run at their lowest practical temperature to meet the utilitarian purpose..... snow melt, home heat, and water pre-heating. This mining system is a heat core with amazing secondary uses.

Softwarm LLC

265,011 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here's Elon Musk explaining how we could warm up Mars. “Nuking Mars, I was a little flippant about that. But I think it's a really decent idea. It's hard to convey in 30 seconds on The Late Show. The sun is a nuclear explosion, a fusion explosion. So if you wanted to add energy to Mars, to warm it up, the source of almost all energy in the universe is fusion. What I was really talking about is creating two little suns, two pulsing suns above the North and South Pole of Mars. That would warm the poles up enough so that the frozen CO2 would gasify and densify the atmosphere. Some of the water would also heat up, and you'd have more water vapor and CO2 in the Martian atmosphere, which in that case is good because the CO2 ends up warming Mars up. And so you get a positive cycle of warming on Mars.” Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit, October 8, 2015.
1:03

Here's Elon Musk explaining how we could warm up Mars. “Nuking Mars, I was a little flippant about that. But I think it's a really decent idea. It's hard to convey in 30 seconds on The Late Show. The sun is a nuclear explosion, a fusion explosion. So if you wanted to add energy to Mars, to warm it up, the source of almost all energy in the universe is fusion. What I was really talking about is creating two little suns, two pulsing suns above the North and South Pole of Mars. That would warm the poles up enough so that the frozen CO2 would gasify and densify the atmosphere. Some of the water would also heat up, and you'd have more water vapor and CO2 in the Martian atmosphere, which in that case is good because the CO2 ends up warming Mars up. And so you get a positive cycle of warming on Mars.” Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit, October 8, 2015.

ELON CLIPS

42,068 次观看 • 2 个月前

"The whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing," Dr. Willie Soon told Tucker Carlson. He says he's 90% sure the sun, not carbon dioxide, is causing climate change and that the climate czars are so out of their minds that they are misleading the public. "I really find that the whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing, which means we should do nothing about it. Just go on and live life and adapt to it." This message will never make the TV news. You should probably share it for others to see.
1:35

"The whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing," Dr. Willie Soon told Tucker Carlson. He says he's 90% sure the sun, not carbon dioxide, is causing climate change and that the climate czars are so out of their minds that they are misleading the public. "I really find that the whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing, which means we should do nothing about it. Just go on and live life and adapt to it." This message will never make the TV news. You should probably share it for others to see.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

776,452 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! 🌍 CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT THE PROBLEM…“In my training carbon dioxide and it’s rise or fall could explain everything that had EVER happened in our climatic history!”. The truth is that carbon dioxide has a logarithmic relationship with temperature, and as CO2 increases it has LESS of a warming effect. We are already at 99% of its saturation point, which means no matter how much more carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere, the Earth will NOT warm significantly in response. This makes the man-made climate argument, frankly, fall on it’s arse 🫡
0:24

🚨 CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! 🌍 CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT THE PROBLEM…“In my training carbon dioxide and it’s rise or fall could explain everything that had EVER happened in our climatic history!”. The truth is that carbon dioxide has a logarithmic relationship with temperature, and as CO2 increases it has LESS of a warming effect. We are already at 99% of its saturation point, which means no matter how much more carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere, the Earth will NOT warm significantly in response. This makes the man-made climate argument, frankly, fall on it’s arse 🫡

Anika

42,475 次观看 • 6 个月前

NASA: Warming Effects of Carbon Pollution Since the 1800s. Wait for it… Since human’s industrialized the Earth has warmed 1.5°C or 2.7°F due to the heat-trapping greenhouse gases released from the burning of fossil fuels, changes in land use, and the feedbacks of both. This may not sound like much, but the living Earth System is just as sensitive to temperature changes as your body. If your body temperature rises 2.7°F, your lethargic. Double that and your life is in danger. That’s where Earth is headed in a few decades if we don’t take collective action to slow it. #climatechange #climateaction #stem #science #Earth
0:24

NASA: Warming Effects of Carbon Pollution Since the 1800s. Wait for it… Since human’s industrialized the Earth has warmed 1.5°C or 2.7°F due to the heat-trapping greenhouse gases released from the burning of fossil fuels, changes in land use, and the feedbacks of both. This may not sound like much, but the living Earth System is just as sensitive to temperature changes as your body. If your body temperature rises 2.7°F, your lethargic. Double that and your life is in danger. That’s where Earth is headed in a few decades if we don’t take collective action to slow it. #climatechange #climateaction #stem #science #Earth

Jeff Berardelli

38,049 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mars holds enough water ice that warming the planet would produce an ocean roughly one mile deep across 40% of its surface. Most of that ice sits under a dust mantle outside the polar caps. Geological evidence indicates liquid water once existed in volume. As the solar system cooled, the atmosphere thinned and the remaining water froze or was lost. That inventory is not theoretical. It is a measurable resource base for any sustained presence on Mars.
1:12

Mars holds enough water ice that warming the planet would produce an ocean roughly one mile deep across 40% of its surface. Most of that ice sits under a dust mantle outside the polar caps. Geological evidence indicates liquid water once existed in volume. As the solar system cooled, the atmosphere thinned and the remaining water froze or was lost. That inventory is not theoretical. It is a measurable resource base for any sustained presence on Mars.

Lacey

43,945 次观看 • 1 个月前

Otherworldly? Sounds over the top, but from the perspective of a meteorologist that’s how out of whack this looks. It’s like nothing we’ve seen before in March. It’s so abnormal that the heat dome causing this heat may even break various records (500mb ERA-5 1950-present) for April and May too! It will likely be just as unusual as the bonkers 2021 Pacific NW heatwave. Below is a map from Tomer Burg It shows 850mb (5,000 ft) temperature records. The magenta shows where this heat will break records - Almost everywhere - through early next week. Let’s be clear: A heatwave like this was virtually impossible before global warming. Vast research shows Climate change makes EVERY heatwave more likely, more intense, larger and longer lasting. And these type of previously unheard of events are now starting to become an every few years event.
0:25

Otherworldly? Sounds over the top, but from the perspective of a meteorologist that’s how out of whack this looks. It’s like nothing we’ve seen before in March. It’s so abnormal that the heat dome causing this heat may even break various records (500mb ERA-5 1950-present) for April and May too! It will likely be just as unusual as the bonkers 2021 Pacific NW heatwave. Below is a map from Tomer Burg It shows 850mb (5,000 ft) temperature records. The magenta shows where this heat will break records - Almost everywhere - through early next week. Let’s be clear: A heatwave like this was virtually impossible before global warming. Vast research shows Climate change makes EVERY heatwave more likely, more intense, larger and longer lasting. And these type of previously unheard of events are now starting to become an every few years event.

Jeff Berardelli

66,168 次观看 • 6 个月前

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
1:05

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

288,203 次观看 • 2 个月前

Back in 1948, Swedish glaciologist Hans Ahlmann documented warming temperatures and glacier retreat from the late 1800s to the 1940s. He called the retreat "climatic improvement." Finland warmed 1.8C in that period and the growing season lengthened by up to three weeks. It was viewed as beneficial, not a crisis - a natural post-little ice age warming. In 1948, roughly 2C of warming in 50 years was considered a fluctuation and an improvement. In 2026, however, a 1C warm up in 50 years is justification for economy-wide controls, speech restrictions and trillion-dollar climate industries. Ahlmann's work dismantles the modern narrative. The planet has warmed more, naturally, even within living memory.
0:45

Back in 1948, Swedish glaciologist Hans Ahlmann documented warming temperatures and glacier retreat from the late 1800s to the 1940s. He called the retreat "climatic improvement." Finland warmed 1.8C in that period and the growing season lengthened by up to three weeks. It was viewed as beneficial, not a crisis - a natural post-little ice age warming. In 1948, roughly 2C of warming in 50 years was considered a fluctuation and an improvement. In 2026, however, a 1C warm up in 50 years is justification for economy-wide controls, speech restrictions and trillion-dollar climate industries. Ahlmann's work dismantles the modern narrative. The planet has warmed more, naturally, even within living memory.

Electroverse

27,136 次观看 • 5 个月前