Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Opus 5 with Unity CLI feels like a cheat code for vibe coding games with AI. Used it to spruce up a scene Fable 5 built to give it a distinct style. → Stylised water → Wind foliage → Scene lighting + contact shadows → Depth outlines Its speed...

chongdashu's profile picture

Chong-U

13,980 subscribers

53,951 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I used Opus 5 with the Unity CLI and Gauntlet Loop to see how well it could build games within Unity. While reviews are mixed on Opus 5 for coding and tasks in general - I think it's a huge unlock for gamedevs. It's understanding of 3D space + ability to self critique is actually one of the most important breakthroughs. 00:00 Intro 02:55 Unity CLI 04:38 Spriterrific 06:40 Unity + Opus 5 08:20 Gauntlet Loop 09:38 Demo 12:21 Wrap Up
13:13

I used Opus 5 with the Unity CLI and Gauntlet Loop to see how well it could build games within Unity. While reviews are mixed on Opus 5 for coding and tasks in general - I think it's a huge unlock for gamedevs. It's understanding of 3D space + ability to self critique is actually one of the most important breakthroughs. 00:00 Intro 02:55 Unity CLI 04:38 Spriterrific 06:40 Unity + Opus 5 08:20 Gauntlet Loop 09:38 Demo 12:21 Wrap Up

Chong-U

34,623 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)
0:56

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)

Anshu

48,983 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Opus 5.5 is here! 🎉 It's honestly such a nice model to work with. Feels like Fable, but ~30% faster and ~40% cheaper per task than Opus 5. Go try it out!
3:32

Opus 5.5 is here! 🎉 It's honestly such a nice model to work with. Feels like Fable, but ~30% faster and ~40% cheaper per task than Opus 5. Go try it out!

Lydia Hallie ✨

291,280 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Claude Fable 5 built a 3D product website with Claude Code Generate an image of a product with the Magnific MCP, and convert it into a 3D model. Download that model and give it to Fable 5 to develop an interactive page with. Here's the final result + prompts:
0:29

Claude Fable 5 built a 3D product website with Claude Code Generate an image of a product with the Magnific MCP, and convert it into a 3D model. Download that model and give it to Fable 5 to develop an interactive page with. Here's the final result + prompts:

Jerrod Lew

33,687 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Clawdbot creator, Peter Steinberger says Opus is the best model overall, but Codex is his go-to for coding. He trusts Codex to handle big codebases with almost no mistakes. It’s more reliable and needs less handholding, which makes him faster. Claude Code can work too, but it requires more effort and tricks. For serious tasks, Codex feels like a dependable coworker.
1:42

Clawdbot creator, Peter Steinberger says Opus is the best model overall, but Codex is his go-to for coding. He trusts Codex to handle big codebases with almost no mistakes. It’s more reliable and needs less handholding, which makes him faster. Claude Code can work too, but it requires more effort and tricks. For serious tasks, Codex feels like a dependable coworker.

Wes Roth

230,226 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚀 Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 is now generally available in GitHub Copilot. Our early testing shows it stands out in efficiency, delivering task resolution comparable to Claude Opus 5 while using significantly fewer steps and tokens, with fast error recovery on multistep tasks. Try it out for agentic coding, long-running agentic tasks, and knowledge work. Find it in the GitHub Copilot app, CLI, and Visual Studio Code.
1:30

🚀 Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 is now generally available in GitHub Copilot. Our early testing shows it stands out in efficiency, delivering task resolution comparable to Claude Opus 5 while using significantly fewer steps and tokens, with fast error recovery on multistep tasks. Try it out for agentic coding, long-running agentic tasks, and knowledge work. Find it in the GitHub Copilot app, CLI, and Visual Studio Code.

GitHub

120,538 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Got introduced to , an AI code assistant specialised for Unity by Julian Park and after dabbling with it for a day, I am really impressed with how good it is for vibe coding on the Unity Game Engine. Bezi early impressions: - Bezi works direcly on Unity with a Plugin, this means that I don't need a Unity MCP - Because Bezi is built for Unity, the success rate of feature implementations is visibly higher than general coding models - It was able to integrate Unity store assets like a Weather system to this game pretty seamlessly - I was able to add a fishing database, lighting and weather systems into this game fairly quickly I'm very impressed with the results with Bezi so far. I feel that vibe coding a full indie game on Unity and releasing it on Steam, Mobile and Web is within reach. This also validates one thing that I have been suspecting: A specialised model designed for a specific use case can perform better than a general model at the particular domain. Very exciting!
0:30

Got introduced to , an AI code assistant specialised for Unity by Julian Park and after dabbling with it for a day, I am really impressed with how good it is for vibe coding on the Unity Game Engine. Bezi early impressions: - Bezi works direcly on Unity with a Plugin, this means that I don't need a Unity MCP - Because Bezi is built for Unity, the success rate of feature implementations is visibly higher than general coding models - It was able to integrate Unity store assets like a Weather system to this game pretty seamlessly - I was able to add a fishing database, lighting and weather systems into this game fairly quickly I'm very impressed with the results with Bezi so far. I feel that vibe coding a full indie game on Unity and releasing it on Steam, Mobile and Web is within reach. This also validates one thing that I have been suspecting: A specialised model designed for a specific use case can perform better than a general model at the particular domain. Very exciting!

Danny Limanseta

49,478 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?
0:56

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

today, we're open sourcing the Extend CLI watch Fable use it to parse and extract an entire corpus of documents — end to end, without leaving the terminal try it yourself: npm install -g @​extend-ai/cli it comes with a built-in agent skill, so claude code/codex/cursor know how to drive it out of the box
0:31

today, we're open sourcing the Extend CLI watch Fable use it to parse and extract an entire corpus of documents — end to end, without leaving the terminal try it yourself: npm install -g @​extend-ai/cli it comes with a built-in agent skill, so claude code/codex/cursor know how to drive it out of the box

Kushal Byatnal

40,134 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A CHINESE GIRL USED FABLE 5 TO BUILD A GAME THAT TURNS YOUR HAND INTO WATER it's for meditation you move your hand, the water moves with it that's the whole game what's running under the hood: > Fable 5 built the entire interaction logic > meshy turned text into the 3D water world > three.js and webGL render everything live in your browser > mediapipe tracks your hand through the camera alone whole thing takes 3-5 minutes and 300+ people already tried it she built this as a way to breathe for 5 minutes ended up making one of the coolest things anyone's done with Fable 5 if you wanna see what else Fable 5 can do full guide below
1:23

A CHINESE GIRL USED FABLE 5 TO BUILD A GAME THAT TURNS YOUR HAND INTO WATER it's for meditation you move your hand, the water moves with it that's the whole game what's running under the hood: > Fable 5 built the entire interaction logic > meshy turned text into the 3D water world > three.js and webGL render everything live in your browser > mediapipe tracks your hand through the camera alone whole thing takes 3-5 minutes and 300+ people already tried it she built this as a way to breathe for 5 minutes ended up making one of the coolest things anyone's done with Fable 5 if you wanna see what else Fable 5 can do full guide below

Madni Aghadi

13,289 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

With worse lighting and shadows, the Series X still can't keep up. Is it too late to ask for a midgen refresh? 😅
0:34

With worse lighting and shadows, the Series X still can't keep up. Is it too late to ask for a midgen refresh? 😅

James

37,774 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)
1:18

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Fable 5.1—and CLAUDE IS SO BACK. We’ve spent the last week testing it at Every 📧 across coding, writing, and knowledge work. Our verdict: It's finally Fable for everyone. It’s the strongest coding model we’ve used, but now it's fast, token-efficient, and CRUCIALLY actually speaks like a normal person. Here’s our vibe check: - A monster at coding. Kieran Klaassen rebuilt a working version of Proof, our document editor, from one prompt. It added useful details he hadn’t requested, and it handles enormous coding jobs that run for days at a time. It built a computer use Mac app for me called Hands in one-shot that other models failed at. - A Claude our writers want to use again. It has clearer prose, fewer AI tells, and it takes an edit without arguing. It's a significant upgrade over Opus 5. And won Katie Parrott's heart back. - About half the tokens as Opus 5, and much faster. In our Slack-agent tests, it delivered comparable results to Opus 5 using about half as many tokens, in about 60% of the time. - Knowledge work you can delegate. It can produce great knowledge work—like slide decks—end to end without making slop. And flew threw hammer's tests with flying colors. - It now supports zero-data-retention agreements. Now businesses can actually use it! A big barrier to Fable adoption is gone. Net Result: It's obviously an Opus 5 killer. If that was your daily driver you should switch today. If you're using GPT-5.6 in ChatGPT for Work, it's spinning the wheels on for big delegated tasks. I still use ChatGPT for Work more day to day, but I use way more tokens in Fable 5.1. I send it off at the beginning of the day to do big programming projects, like end to end MVP builds, and check in every once in a while. State of Play: The big knock on Anthropic was they built a supergenius in a datacenter that was almost unusable. It was too slow, argued back, and talked in technical gibberish. They've managed to solve those problems and more with Fable 5.1!
20:44

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Fable 5.1—and CLAUDE IS SO BACK. We’ve spent the last week testing it at Every 📧 across coding, writing, and knowledge work. Our verdict: It's finally Fable for everyone. It’s the strongest coding model we’ve used, but now it's fast, token-efficient, and CRUCIALLY actually speaks like a normal person. Here’s our vibe check: - A monster at coding. Kieran Klaassen rebuilt a working version of Proof, our document editor, from one prompt. It added useful details he hadn’t requested, and it handles enormous coding jobs that run for days at a time. It built a computer use Mac app for me called Hands in one-shot that other models failed at. - A Claude our writers want to use again. It has clearer prose, fewer AI tells, and it takes an edit without arguing. It's a significant upgrade over Opus 5. And won Katie Parrott's heart back. - About half the tokens as Opus 5, and much faster. In our Slack-agent tests, it delivered comparable results to Opus 5 using about half as many tokens, in about 60% of the time. - Knowledge work you can delegate. It can produce great knowledge work—like slide decks—end to end without making slop. And flew threw hammer's tests with flying colors. - It now supports zero-data-retention agreements. Now businesses can actually use it! A big barrier to Fable adoption is gone. Net Result: It's obviously an Opus 5 killer. If that was your daily driver you should switch today. If you're using GPT-5.6 in ChatGPT for Work, it's spinning the wheels on for big delegated tasks. I still use ChatGPT for Work more day to day, but I use way more tokens in Fable 5.1. I send it off at the beginning of the day to do big programming projects, like end to end MVP builds, and check in every once in a while. State of Play: The big knock on Anthropic was they built a supergenius in a datacenter that was almost unusable. It was too slow, argued back, and talked in technical gibberish. They've managed to solve those problems and more with Fable 5.1!

Dan Shipper

204,342 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Rick Carlisle on The Charlotte Hornets: “They’re a team on the come for sure…with 5 or 6 games to go, it still feels like they’re getting better”
1:03

Rick Carlisle on The Charlotte Hornets: “They’re a team on the come for sure…with 5 or 6 games to go, it still feels like they’re getting better”

Kyle Ingram

17,606 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

NEW VIDEO: every major AI model ranked for vibe coding. Fable 5 is still the only S tier. Opus 5 redeemed itself to A tier. Grok 4.6 is B tier with the best subscription in AI. Real world rankings from someone who spends over $1,000 a month on AI subscriptions. Not benchmarks. I do not recommend anything below B tier.
27:44

NEW VIDEO: every major AI model ranked for vibe coding. Fable 5 is still the only S tier. Opus 5 redeemed itself to A tier. Grok 4.6 is B tier with the best subscription in AI. Real world rankings from someone who spends over $1,000 a month on AI subscriptions. Not benchmarks. I do not recommend anything below B tier.

BridgeMind

24,911 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Claude Fable 5 has been out for a day. I already one-shotted a voxel spaceship racer with it. I fed it a reference image of a track layout and told it to build a full game around that shape. Missiles, boost zones, 3 AI opponents, 3 laps, a HUD with speed and health. Fable 5 read the image, traced the track geometry, and built the entire thing. One prompt. This is what Mythos-class models do to the build cycle.
1:21

Claude Fable 5 has been out for a day. I already one-shotted a voxel spaceship racer with it. I fed it a reference image of a track layout and told it to build a full game around that shape. Missiles, boost zones, 3 AI opponents, 3 laps, a HUD with speed and health. Fable 5 read the image, traced the track geometry, and built the entire thing. One prompt. This is what Mythos-class models do to the build cycle.

God of Prompt

27,386 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🆕 Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Early testing shows: • It demonstrates a clear step forward in code understanding and generation across a range of real-world coding tasks. • It handles complex problem-solving and large-codebase navigation with notable improvement to previous versions. Try it out in Visual Studio Code or Copilot CLI.
0:44

🆕 Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Early testing shows: • It demonstrates a clear step forward in code understanding and generation across a range of real-world coding tasks. • It handles complex problem-solving and large-codebase navigation with notable improvement to previous versions. Try it out in Visual Studio Code or Copilot CLI.

GitHub

209,555 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🔍 ChatGPT 4o vs. CodeRun AI: A Comparison 🤖 ChatGPT 4o : Known for its powerful language understanding capabilities, ChatGPT 4.0 is a versatile AI model that can assist with a wide range of tasks, including coding. With its expansive knowledge base, it's a fantastic resource for brainstorming ideas, generating code snippets, and providing context-specific advice. It's a Paid Version 💡 CodeRun AI : Enter the game-changer! CodeRun AI stands out for its simplicity and ease of use. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting your coding journey, this tool streamlines the coding process like never before. With its intuitive interface and smart suggestions, CodeRun AI empowers users at any skill level to write better code, faster. It's Free to use at In conclusion, when it comes to AI for coding, simplicity and effectiveness are key. CodeRun AI embodies these principles, making it the ultimate choice for developers of all levels. Give it a try and experience the future of coding today! 💻✨ #CodeRunAI #CodingSimplified #AIForDevelopers #chatgpt4o
1:35

🔍 ChatGPT 4o vs. CodeRun AI: A Comparison 🤖 ChatGPT 4o : Known for its powerful language understanding capabilities, ChatGPT 4.0 is a versatile AI model that can assist with a wide range of tasks, including coding. With its expansive knowledge base, it's a fantastic resource for brainstorming ideas, generating code snippets, and providing context-specific advice. It's a Paid Version 💡 CodeRun AI : Enter the game-changer! CodeRun AI stands out for its simplicity and ease of use. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting your coding journey, this tool streamlines the coding process like never before. With its intuitive interface and smart suggestions, CodeRun AI empowers users at any skill level to write better code, faster. It's Free to use at In conclusion, when it comes to AI for coding, simplicity and effectiveness are key. CodeRun AI embodies these principles, making it the ultimate choice for developers of all levels. Give it a try and experience the future of coding today! 💻✨ #CodeRunAI #CodingSimplified #AIForDevelopers #chatgpt4o

XDC Network News

59,403 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren