Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."

Conservative War Machine

17,946 subscribers

45,763 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Comments

Spergin General1 year ago

He'd let Trump fuck his wife too.

The System1 year ago

I think he needs to learn more about Article I powers.

This place is broken1 year ago

speaker Mike Johnson is a weak pathetic man, not up to the job, no spine and also completely ignorant of the facts. Oust this beta cuck, he sucks.

Patrick Ryan1 year ago

Trump before anything and everything with this guy.

Rich Coupe1 year ago

Every US presidential admin has claimed the War Powers Act is unconstitutional while Congress has claimed it is constitutional. It's never been resolved in court.

investInlead1 year ago

Article I outlines specific powers granted to Congress, including the ability to collect taxes, regulate commerce, declare war, and raise an army and navy.

Related Videos

Mike Johnson: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article 2 powers of the commander in chief. I think that's right."

Mike Johnson: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article 2 powers of the commander in chief. I think that's right."

Aaron Rupar

898,216 views • 1 year ago

House Speaker Mike Johnson continued to argue that the U.S. is not at war with Iran following the failed war powers resolution vote in the House on Thursday. "We are not at war. We have no intention of being at war," Johnson told reporters.

House Speaker Mike Johnson continued to argue that the U.S. is not at war with Iran following the failed war powers resolution vote in the House on Thursday. "We are not at war. We have no intention of being at war," Johnson told reporters.

ABC News

57,929 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 views • 2 months ago

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

11,853 views • 1 year ago

Johnson: The idea that a few colleagues here would try to move a war powers motion and resolution to the floor right now is dangerous. It plays right into the hands of the enemy. I think it's shameful.

Johnson: The idea that a few colleagues here would try to move a war powers motion and resolution to the floor right now is dangerous. It plays right into the hands of the enemy. I think it's shameful.

Acyn

167,363 views • 4 months ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,659 views • 2 months ago

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 views • 4 months ago

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

The Bulwark

62,537 views • 2 months ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

Nick Sortor

111,283 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 Speaker Johnson: "I think passage of a War Powers resolution right now would be a terrible, dangerous idea." Democracy? Nah, just chilling doing our wars

🇺🇸 Speaker Johnson: "I think passage of a War Powers resolution right now would be a terrible, dangerous idea." Democracy? Nah, just chilling doing our wars

Mario Nawfal

149,206 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson just PUMMELED Democrats for playing right into the hands of Iran by trying to force a War Powers vote and hamstring President Trump "The IDEA some members would play along with that plays RIGHT into the hands of the enemy! I believe we have the votes to defeat it!" "The idea a few colleagues would try to move a War Powers resolution to the floor is DANGEROUS! IMAGINE Congress voting to tell the Commander-in-Chief he can no longer complete this mission! That would be a VERY dangerous thing. Iran is firing almost indiscriminately!" The War Powers vote must lose.

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson just PUMMELED Democrats for playing right into the hands of Iran by trying to force a War Powers vote and hamstring President Trump "The IDEA some members would play along with that plays RIGHT into the hands of the enemy! I believe we have the votes to defeat it!" "The idea a few colleagues would try to move a War Powers resolution to the floor is DANGEROUS! IMAGINE Congress voting to tell the Commander-in-Chief he can no longer complete this mission! That would be a VERY dangerous thing. Iran is firing almost indiscriminately!" The War Powers vote must lose.

Eric Daugherty

69,565 views • 4 months ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,786 views • 2 months ago

Just your reminder that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is still valid.

Just your reminder that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is still valid.

Joe Redden | The Older Millennial

42,025 views • 6 months ago

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

43,496 views • 4 months ago

Trump’s attacks on Iran are both illegal and unconstitutional. Congress alone has the constitutional authority to declare war. We must vote urgently on the War Powers resolution.

Trump’s attacks on Iran are both illegal and unconstitutional. Congress alone has the constitutional authority to declare war. We must vote urgently on the War Powers resolution.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

17,819 views • 4 months ago

Mike Johnson: "The war powers act on the House floor is being forced. They're going around the speaker with a discharge to bring that to the floor. I don't believe it'll pass and I hope it doesn't, because we don't need to take away the authority from the commander in chief and the Pentagon right now."

Mike Johnson: "The war powers act on the House floor is being forced. They're going around the speaker with a discharge to bring that to the floor. I don't believe it'll pass and I hope it doesn't, because we don't need to take away the authority from the commander in chief and the Pentagon right now."

Aaron Rupar

274,586 views • 1 month ago

JD Vance: "The War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law"

JD Vance: "The War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law"

Aaron Rupar

7,866,797 views • 6 months ago

.Speaker Mike Johnson: It’s important to remember who we’re discussing here. Evil is the right word. Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism on planet Earth...The strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were clearly within President Trump's Article II powers as commander-in-chief.

.Speaker Mike Johnson: It’s important to remember who we’re discussing here. Evil is the right word. Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism on planet Earth...The strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were clearly within President Trump's Article II powers as commander-in-chief.

CSPAN

13,340 views • 1 year ago

🔥🚨 BREAKING — The U.S. House has approved an anti-Trump War Powers Resolution aimed at restricting military action against Iran by a vote of 215-208. Cheers were heard on the floor following passage. Four Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, and Davidson. The resolution is largely viewed as symbolic since President Trump has long maintained that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional.

🔥🚨 BREAKING — The U.S. House has approved an anti-Trump War Powers Resolution aimed at restricting military action against Iran by a vote of 215-208. Cheers were heard on the floor following passage. Four Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, and Davidson. The resolution is largely viewed as symbolic since President Trump has long maintained that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional.

The Patriot Oasis™

23,456 views • 1 month ago

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Breaking911

40,058 views • 4 months ago