正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Sports Mode in the Honda Elevate is definitely fun for quick overtakes, especially if you want to pull from 60–110 km/h quickly with around 145 Nm of torque available. Beyond 110 km/h, the pull up to 150 km/h (highly not recommended) is definitely stronger in 1.5 turbocharged engines, where... show more

Sunderdeep - Volklub

55,611 subscribers

43,385 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术汽车交通

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

First impressions for Honda City 2026 and ZR-V (Hybrid) Honda City with 4 cylinder Hybrid and 250+ nm torque is extremely VFM with a claimed FE of 27 km/l. Excellent, if your running is above 1500 km and you want premium interiors, features and fine dynamics too. It isn’t expensive when you will notice top variant pricing of 3 cyl Hybrid Hyryder / GV / Victoris. The tech & feel of the car is superior.

First impressions for Honda City 2026 and ZR-V (Hybrid) Honda City with 4 cylinder Hybrid and 250+ nm torque is extremely VFM with a claimed FE of 27 km/l. Excellent, if your running is above 1500 km and you want premium interiors, features and fine dynamics too. It isn’t expensive when you will notice top variant pricing of 3 cyl Hybrid Hyryder / GV / Victoris. The tech & feel of the car is superior.

Sunderdeep - Volklub

30,094 次观看 • 3 个月前

This confusion at the GTC Junction is easily resolved using a set of traffic lights with cameras sending automated fines to offenders. But lets focus on enforcing 50 km/h speed limits on major highways designed for 100km/h-110 km/h.

This confusion at the GTC Junction is easily resolved using a set of traffic lights with cameras sending automated fines to offenders. But lets focus on enforcing 50 km/h speed limits on major highways designed for 100km/h-110 km/h.

Mbabz

52,764 次观看 • 1 个月前

Torque is the real thing, brothers. If your usage includes highways, hills, or driving with 3–4 passengers in the city (especially in the 40–70 km/h range), don’t compromise on torque while comparing cars. That’s where effortless performance, fewer downshifts, and real-world drivability come from, not just horsepower & cc on paper.

Torque is the real thing, brothers. If your usage includes highways, hills, or driving with 3–4 passengers in the city (especially in the 40–70 km/h range), don’t compromise on torque while comparing cars. That’s where effortless performance, fewer downshifts, and real-world drivability come from, not just horsepower & cc on paper.

Sunderdeep - Volklub

42,025 次观看 • 5 个月前

Every line is sculpted for performance. Every carbon-fiber detail has a purpose. Beneath its design, a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 engine paired with a permanent-magnet electric motor delivers 812 CV and 1000 Nm of torque, launching Lamborghini Urus SE Performante from 0–100 km/h in 3.3 seconds and on to a top speed of 312 km/h. #Lamborghini #UrusSEPerformante #UrusAtItsPeak

Every line is sculpted for performance. Every carbon-fiber detail has a purpose. Beneath its design, a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 engine paired with a permanent-magnet electric motor delivers 812 CV and 1000 Nm of torque, launching Lamborghini Urus SE Performante from 0–100 km/h in 3.3 seconds and on to a top speed of 312 km/h. #Lamborghini #UrusSEPerformante #UrusAtItsPeak

Lamborghini

83,536 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tf you mean 230 km/h in 3rd gear 😭 This BMW S1000RR is actually stupid fast. The 999cc inline four makes around 210 hp and 113 Nm, and it can rev all the way to 15,100 rpm. And that’s what makes the 230 km/h in third gear part so crazy. This thing has a 6 speed gearbox, BMW ShiftCam technology and a whole stack of electronics working in the background to keep all that power usable. It’ll do 0 to 100 km/h in about 3.2 seconds and has a claimed top speed of 303 km/h.

Tf you mean 230 km/h in 3rd gear 😭 This BMW S1000RR is actually stupid fast. The 999cc inline four makes around 210 hp and 113 Nm, and it can rev all the way to 15,100 rpm. And that’s what makes the 230 km/h in third gear part so crazy. This thing has a 6 speed gearbox, BMW ShiftCam technology and a whole stack of electronics working in the background to keep all that power usable. It’ll do 0 to 100 km/h in about 3.2 seconds and has a claimed top speed of 303 km/h.

moh

34,990 次观看 • 15 天前

The 525e was designed at a time when power was no longer the only thing that mattered. The e stands for eta, the Greek letter used in thermodynamics to denote efficiency. BMW took the M20 2.0L petrol engine, stroked it to 2.7L, and optimised it not for peak power but for maximum torque at the lowest possible RPM. The result was 125 PS, almost identical to the 520i alongside it, but with 240 Nm available from just 3,250 RPM, which was more low-end torque than even the turbocharged 524td diesel at the time. 0-100 km/h in around 11 seconds is honest about what it is. What those numbers don't tell you is that the 525e pulls from 1,500 RPM, cruises at motorway speeds without working, and does it all with the inherent smoothness of a naturally aspirated inline-six that simply cannot be replicated by a diesel or a four-cylinder. Fuel consumption ended up being somewhere around 8 to 9 L/100 km and with a 70 L fuel tank the car could even do 1000 km trips. BMW sold it with a very long final drive ratio specifically to keep revs low at speed. It was designed for people who drove and appreciated the journey rather than the sprint. A slow BMW that is genuinely enjoyable, in the most honest way a BMW can be.

The 525e was designed at a time when power was no longer the only thing that mattered. The e stands for eta, the Greek letter used in thermodynamics to denote efficiency. BMW took the M20 2.0L petrol engine, stroked it to 2.7L, and optimised it not for peak power but for maximum torque at the lowest possible RPM. The result was 125 PS, almost identical to the 520i alongside it, but with 240 Nm available from just 3,250 RPM, which was more low-end torque than even the turbocharged 524td diesel at the time. 0-100 km/h in around 11 seconds is honest about what it is. What those numbers don't tell you is that the 525e pulls from 1,500 RPM, cruises at motorway speeds without working, and does it all with the inherent smoothness of a naturally aspirated inline-six that simply cannot be replicated by a diesel or a four-cylinder. Fuel consumption ended up being somewhere around 8 to 9 L/100 km and with a 70 L fuel tank the car could even do 1000 km trips. BMW sold it with a very long final drive ratio specifically to keep revs low at speed. It was designed for people who drove and appreciated the journey rather than the sprint. A slow BMW that is genuinely enjoyable, in the most honest way a BMW can be.

Autowelt

47,069 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is Newton’s Cannonball. It’s the secret to how every satellite, including the ISS, stays in the sky without "floating." They are in a state of permanent free-fall. Orbital Velocity: 28,000 km/h. This is the speed required to "fall" around the curve of the Earth. Escape Velocity: 40,000 km/h. The speed needed to leave Earth and head for Mars or beyond.

This is Newton’s Cannonball. It’s the secret to how every satellite, including the ISS, stays in the sky without "floating." They are in a state of permanent free-fall. Orbital Velocity: 28,000 km/h. This is the speed required to "fall" around the curve of the Earth. Escape Velocity: 40,000 km/h. The speed needed to leave Earth and head for Mars or beyond.

Cosmos Archive

22,858 次观看 • 4 个月前

China has revealed a U9 supercar that jumps over potholes Thanks to the improved suspension, the car is able to jump up to 6 meters in length and about 3.5 cm in height at speeds up to 120 km/h, overcoming potholes, spikes and other obstacles on the road. This luxury is not affordable for everyone, because the car can cost about 230 thousand dollars.

China has revealed a U9 supercar that jumps over potholes Thanks to the improved suspension, the car is able to jump up to 6 meters in length and about 3.5 cm in height at speeds up to 120 km/h, overcoming potholes, spikes and other obstacles on the road. This luxury is not affordable for everyone, because the car can cost about 230 thousand dollars.

NEXTA

154,541 次观看 • 1 年前

⚡️‼️🇷🇺The Russian side has effectively confirmed for the first time that the "Orion" (also known as "Inokhodets") drone is a carrier for the small-sized cruise missile "Banderol." Ukraine designates this missile as S-8000. According to reports, the munition is capable of hitting targets at a maximum range of up to 500 km. The "Banderol's" cruising speed is 520–560 km/h, with a maximum speed of up to 650 km/h. The warhead weighs approximately 114–150 kg (with a net explosive weight of around 50 kg). It appears that the "Orion" is capable of carrying only one such missile. The most interesting aspect is the model and manufacturer of the jet engine. For a long time, a Chinese commercial engine, the Swiwin SW800Pro, was used on these missiles.

⚡️‼️🇷🇺The Russian side has effectively confirmed for the first time that the "Orion" (also known as "Inokhodets") drone is a carrier for the small-sized cruise missile "Banderol." Ukraine designates this missile as S-8000. According to reports, the munition is capable of hitting targets at a maximum range of up to 500 km. The "Banderol's" cruising speed is 520–560 km/h, with a maximum speed of up to 650 km/h. The warhead weighs approximately 114–150 kg (with a net explosive weight of around 50 kg). It appears that the "Orion" is capable of carrying only one such missile. The most interesting aspect is the model and manufacturer of the jet engine. For a long time, a Chinese commercial engine, the Swiwin SW800Pro, was used on these missiles.

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ

108,924 次观看 • 1 个月前

Driving at 250 km/h on highways? That’s reckless! Without a proper race track, it’s unsafe anywhere in the world, not just India. Then they say the tyre burst that’s bound to happen at those speeds, especially with HT tyres. That’s exactly why I always say: switch to AT tyres. Still, none of this is acceptable. I wish YouTube had stricter filters or controls on posting videos that promote such dangerous speeds! YouTube BMW

Driving at 250 km/h on highways? That’s reckless! Without a proper race track, it’s unsafe anywhere in the world, not just India. Then they say the tyre burst that’s bound to happen at those speeds, especially with HT tyres. That’s exactly why I always say: switch to AT tyres. Still, none of this is acceptable. I wish YouTube had stricter filters or controls on posting videos that promote such dangerous speeds! YouTube BMW

Rattan Dhillon

60,090 次观看 • 4 个月前

A lot is being said about Tesla FSD. This video shows something different. FSD is set to a maximum speed of 130 km/h. The recognized speed limit is 120 km/h. When I press the accelerator, I can temporarily exceed that speed. But the moment I release the pedal, FSD smoothly returns to 120 km/h. In other words, Tesla does not continue speeding on its own. And let’s not forget the most important fact: The driver remains responsible for the vehicle at all times. FSD (Supervised) is a driver-assistance system that follows traffic rules, not a replacement for the driver. Watch the video. Facts over fear.

A lot is being said about Tesla FSD. This video shows something different. FSD is set to a maximum speed of 130 km/h. The recognized speed limit is 120 km/h. When I press the accelerator, I can temporarily exceed that speed. But the moment I release the pedal, FSD smoothly returns to 120 km/h. In other words, Tesla does not continue speeding on its own. And let’s not forget the most important fact: The driver remains responsible for the vehicle at all times. FSD (Supervised) is a driver-assistance system that follows traffic rules, not a replacement for the driver. Watch the video. Facts over fear.

NL F$D Inside

104,239 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇨🇳 CHINA'S MAGLEV HITS 700 KM/H IN 2 SECONDS - PLANNING 1,000 KM/H - WHILE AMERICA ARGUES ABOUT FIXING POTHOLES China just tested a maglev platform that accelerates to 700 km/h (435 mph) in 2 seconds. Target speed: 1,000 km/h (621 mph). That's faster than commercial aircraft. On the ground. The acceleration alone is borderline violent - 0 to 435 mph in two seconds is 9.8g. Fighter jet territory. Passengers would need specialized seating just to survive the launch. But let's address reality: This is a test platform. Prototype speeds don't mean operational trains. China announces ambitious projects constantly. Some materialize (their existing 430 km/h maglev in Shanghai works). Others disappear quietly. The pattern though? They're attempting scale nobody else is. High-speed rail connecting every major city. Maglev research pushed to extremes. Infrastructure spending that makes Western investment look microscopic. Meanwhile in America: Amtrak averages 105 km/h between cities. California's high-speed rail project started in 2008, burned $10+ billion, and hasn't moved a passenger. The fastest train in the U.S. hits 240 km/h for exactly one 54-mile stretch. China's going for 1,000 km/h. Even if they only achieve 800 km/h operationally, that's still triple America's maximum. Here's why this matters beyond trains: Infrastructure capacity signals industrial capability. If China can build and operate 1,000 km/h trains, they can manufacture the precision components, power systems, and control mechanisms that transfer to aerospace, military, and manufacturing. The U.S. won the 20th century partly because it built the Interstate Highway System when others couldn't. China's betting the 21st century winner will be whoever builds impossible infrastructure first. They might fail. Engineering challenges at 1,000 km/h are extreme - air resistance, track precision, emergency braking, passenger safety. But they're trying while America argues whether to fix the L train in New York. Even Chinese failure puts them ahead. You learn more from attempting the impossible than from successfully maintaining mediocrity. Source: Xinhua, CGTN

🇨🇳 CHINA'S MAGLEV HITS 700 KM/H IN 2 SECONDS - PLANNING 1,000 KM/H - WHILE AMERICA ARGUES ABOUT FIXING POTHOLES China just tested a maglev platform that accelerates to 700 km/h (435 mph) in 2 seconds. Target speed: 1,000 km/h (621 mph). That's faster than commercial aircraft. On the ground. The acceleration alone is borderline violent - 0 to 435 mph in two seconds is 9.8g. Fighter jet territory. Passengers would need specialized seating just to survive the launch. But let's address reality: This is a test platform. Prototype speeds don't mean operational trains. China announces ambitious projects constantly. Some materialize (their existing 430 km/h maglev in Shanghai works). Others disappear quietly. The pattern though? They're attempting scale nobody else is. High-speed rail connecting every major city. Maglev research pushed to extremes. Infrastructure spending that makes Western investment look microscopic. Meanwhile in America: Amtrak averages 105 km/h between cities. California's high-speed rail project started in 2008, burned $10+ billion, and hasn't moved a passenger. The fastest train in the U.S. hits 240 km/h for exactly one 54-mile stretch. China's going for 1,000 km/h. Even if they only achieve 800 km/h operationally, that's still triple America's maximum. Here's why this matters beyond trains: Infrastructure capacity signals industrial capability. If China can build and operate 1,000 km/h trains, they can manufacture the precision components, power systems, and control mechanisms that transfer to aerospace, military, and manufacturing. The U.S. won the 20th century partly because it built the Interstate Highway System when others couldn't. China's betting the 21st century winner will be whoever builds impossible infrastructure first. They might fail. Engineering challenges at 1,000 km/h are extreme - air resistance, track precision, emergency braking, passenger safety. But they're trying while America argues whether to fix the L train in New York. Even Chinese failure puts them ahead. You learn more from attempting the impossible than from successfully maintaining mediocrity. Source: Xinhua, CGTN

Mario Nawfal

818,316 次观看 • 8 个月前

This pricing from Hyundai is crazy! ✅ Creta Turbo Manual (N-Line) - ₹19L ✅ Alcazar Turbo Manual (Executive) - ₹14.49L Both get the same 1.5 Turbo Petrol engine with 253 Nm torque. But Alcazar gives you: • 5+2 seating • Much more space • 3-row AC vents • 4 disc brakes • Cruise control • Digital cockpit • Alloy wheels • LED headlamps • 6 airbags All for ₹4.5L For someone with 50:50 or 60:40 usage, Alcazar Executive is probably one of the most underrated value picks today from Hyundai’s stable. Must check if you are looking for performance, practicality, support and reliability as a package. Much better than buying a Creta and Seltos or Hyryder/GV in MT with Naturally Aspirated Petrol with 144 nm torque for highways where we need torque for overtakes and smooth driving with full load. Most buyers simply don’t notice this variant because in the showroom they look nothing else than Creta 😉

This pricing from Hyundai is crazy! ✅ Creta Turbo Manual (N-Line) - ₹19L ✅ Alcazar Turbo Manual (Executive) - ₹14.49L Both get the same 1.5 Turbo Petrol engine with 253 Nm torque. But Alcazar gives you: • 5+2 seating • Much more space • 3-row AC vents • 4 disc brakes • Cruise control • Digital cockpit • Alloy wheels • LED headlamps • 6 airbags All for ₹4.5L For someone with 50:50 or 60:40 usage, Alcazar Executive is probably one of the most underrated value picks today from Hyundai’s stable. Must check if you are looking for performance, practicality, support and reliability as a package. Much better than buying a Creta and Seltos or Hyryder/GV in MT with Naturally Aspirated Petrol with 144 nm torque for highways where we need torque for overtakes and smooth driving with full load. Most buyers simply don’t notice this variant because in the showroom they look nothing else than Creta 😉

Sunderdeep - Volklub

188,101 次观看 • 5 个月前

Oil technology has improved a lot & most modern fully synthetic oils such as 5W-30 can comfortably last up to 10,000 km in many petrol engines ( if the manufacturer recommends that interval.) However factoring in idling in traffic & short trips 8,000 or 9,000 km is a sweet spot. With the higher sulfur fuel in our country or if your engine has high mileage 7,500 km is good. A 5,000 km interval for a car recommended at 10,000 only makes sense if you use your car under very high rpms like offroad , towing or very dusty environments. For car care tips follow our WhatsApp channel . Heres the link

Oil technology has improved a lot & most modern fully synthetic oils such as 5W-30 can comfortably last up to 10,000 km in many petrol engines ( if the manufacturer recommends that interval.) However factoring in idling in traffic & short trips 8,000 or 9,000 km is a sweet spot. With the higher sulfur fuel in our country or if your engine has high mileage 7,500 km is good. A 5,000 km interval for a car recommended at 10,000 only makes sense if you use your car under very high rpms like offroad , towing or very dusty environments. For car care tips follow our WhatsApp channel . Heres the link

4Real

20,572 次观看 • 1 个月前

BMW M3, E92. 414 hp. From a 4.0L naturally aspirated V8. Revving to 8,400 rpm with no turbo. 0–100 km/h in around 4.6 seconds. Back then, 400 hp meant revs and sound in the 2000s. Not torque, not instant speed. This was about the experience, this car wanted you to rev the engine hard, this is a backroads car for going fast. One of the last naturally aspirated M3s. Compared to a modern M340i with maybe similar power, this feels slower, but this M3 is way better feeling and its a V8 M3, the only V8 M3 and the older M3's feel way way more alive.

BMW M3, E92. 414 hp. From a 4.0L naturally aspirated V8. Revving to 8,400 rpm with no turbo. 0–100 km/h in around 4.6 seconds. Back then, 400 hp meant revs and sound in the 2000s. Not torque, not instant speed. This was about the experience, this car wanted you to rev the engine hard, this is a backroads car for going fast. One of the last naturally aspirated M3s. Compared to a modern M340i with maybe similar power, this feels slower, but this M3 is way better feeling and its a V8 M3, the only V8 M3 and the older M3's feel way way more alive.

Autowelt

58,875 次观看 • 4 个月前

Can Venezuela withstand the attack after Trump's green light? Initially, the targets would be Venezuelan radars, which would be attacked by American drones, disabling the anti-aircraft defenses. Venezuela does not have a dedicated drone interception system, which could be a crucial vulnerability. Iglas and RBS 70 are the only options to attack drones flying at max 5,000m altitude. Regarding the radars, Venezuela is operating only a little over half of its systems, which are Russian and Chinese models. American radars are partially operational. - HK-JM2: Chinese; 500 km; Long-range defense; Operational. - JYL-1: Chinese; 470 km; Long-range 3D; 7+ units; Operational. - JY-11B: Chinese; 450 km; 3D UHF; Multiple units; Operational. - TPS-70: American; 370 km; Mobile surveillance; Unknown status; Partially operational. - 36D6 Tin Shield: Russian; 300 km; 3D detection; Operational. - TPS-43: American; 360 km; Air surveillance; Unknown status; Possibly inoperative. These radars are also critical for the operation of Venezuelan drones and antiship missiles, which are quite numerous. Venezuelan Aerial Drones (Iranian, Russian, and Domestic): - Arpía 1/ANSU-100 (Mohajer-2): Iranian/local; Range: 50 km; Speed: 200 km/h; Dozens in use. - Orlan-10: Russian; Range: 120 km; Speed: 150 km/h. - Qods Mohajer/Mersad: Iranian; Range: 50 km; Speed: 200 km/h. - ANT-3X Gavilán: Venezuelan; Range: 120 km; Speed: 150 km/h. - Mohajer-6: Iranian; Range: 2,000 km; Speed: 200 km/h. - ANSU-200: Venezuelan/Iranian; Range: 500 km; Speed: 200 km/h (experimental). - Zamora V-1 (Shahed-136): Venezuelan; Range: 30 km; Speed: 150 km/h. Venezuelan Marine Drones (Domestic and Confirmed): - RAMMAX: Venezuelan; Range: 20 km; Speed: 20 km/h; (coastal patrol). - Iranian-Modified USVs (Peykaap III): Range: 50 km; Speed: 50 km/h. Chinese Marine Drones (Some unconfirmed): - Yunzhou: Chinese; Range: 740 km; Speed: 85 km/h (high-speed). - Cavalry A150: Chinese; Range: 500 km; Speed: 40 km/h. - Lanjing: Chinese; Range: 600 km; Speed: 74 km/h (submersible). - Scout S45: Chinese; Range: 350 km; Speed: 40 km/h. - Anti-mine UAV: Chinese; Range: 200 km; Speed: 40 km/h. Venezuelan Anti-Ship Missiles: - Kh-35 variants: Russian; Range: 130–300 km; Speed: Mach 0.8. - C-802/YJ-83: Chinese; Range: 180 km; Speed: Mach 0.9. - Kh-31 variants: Russian; Range: 110–250 km; Speed: Mach 3.5; Quantity: 20–50 (Su-30MK2, 2025). - CM-90 (Nasir-1): Iranian; Range: 90 km; Speed: Mach 0.85. Venezuelan Boats with Anti-Ship Missiles: - Nasr-1: Peykaap/IRGC swarms; Range: 90 km; Speed: Mach 0.85. - Fajr-3: Fast, asymmetric boats; Range: 25 km; Speed: Mach 0.7. Regarding vessels, the biggest threat from Venezuela are Iranian fast attack boats and their anti-ship missiles. I see no space for the rest of the navy to operate in this scenario. They might not even leave the naval bases. Even with the U.S. deploying a partial force, it's far beyond Venezuelan capabilities, but I repeat: If the Venezuelan military agrees to fight, these anti-ship missiles and drones will give the American fleet a hard time. Yemen has far less against a much larger task force and still made a significant impact. The defense systems as S300VM, Buk-2M and Pechoras were deployed around several cities. Maduro isn't as popular as Chavez was, and Venezuela is going through a tough time now, without even the support of its neighbors, something that wasn't the case in the past.

Can Venezuela withstand the attack after Trump's green light? Initially, the targets would be Venezuelan radars, which would be attacked by American drones, disabling the anti-aircraft defenses. Venezuela does not have a dedicated drone interception system, which could be a crucial vulnerability. Iglas and RBS 70 are the only options to attack drones flying at max 5,000m altitude. Regarding the radars, Venezuela is operating only a little over half of its systems, which are Russian and Chinese models. American radars are partially operational. - HK-JM2: Chinese; 500 km; Long-range defense; Operational. - JYL-1: Chinese; 470 km; Long-range 3D; 7+ units; Operational. - JY-11B: Chinese; 450 km; 3D UHF; Multiple units; Operational. - TPS-70: American; 370 km; Mobile surveillance; Unknown status; Partially operational. - 36D6 Tin Shield: Russian; 300 km; 3D detection; Operational. - TPS-43: American; 360 km; Air surveillance; Unknown status; Possibly inoperative. These radars are also critical for the operation of Venezuelan drones and antiship missiles, which are quite numerous. Venezuelan Aerial Drones (Iranian, Russian, and Domestic): - Arpía 1/ANSU-100 (Mohajer-2): Iranian/local; Range: 50 km; Speed: 200 km/h; Dozens in use. - Orlan-10: Russian; Range: 120 km; Speed: 150 km/h. - Qods Mohajer/Mersad: Iranian; Range: 50 km; Speed: 200 km/h. - ANT-3X Gavilán: Venezuelan; Range: 120 km; Speed: 150 km/h. - Mohajer-6: Iranian; Range: 2,000 km; Speed: 200 km/h. - ANSU-200: Venezuelan/Iranian; Range: 500 km; Speed: 200 km/h (experimental). - Zamora V-1 (Shahed-136): Venezuelan; Range: 30 km; Speed: 150 km/h. Venezuelan Marine Drones (Domestic and Confirmed): - RAMMAX: Venezuelan; Range: 20 km; Speed: 20 km/h; (coastal patrol). - Iranian-Modified USVs (Peykaap III): Range: 50 km; Speed: 50 km/h. Chinese Marine Drones (Some unconfirmed): - Yunzhou: Chinese; Range: 740 km; Speed: 85 km/h (high-speed). - Cavalry A150: Chinese; Range: 500 km; Speed: 40 km/h. - Lanjing: Chinese; Range: 600 km; Speed: 74 km/h (submersible). - Scout S45: Chinese; Range: 350 km; Speed: 40 km/h. - Anti-mine UAV: Chinese; Range: 200 km; Speed: 40 km/h. Venezuelan Anti-Ship Missiles: - Kh-35 variants: Russian; Range: 130–300 km; Speed: Mach 0.8. - C-802/YJ-83: Chinese; Range: 180 km; Speed: Mach 0.9. - Kh-31 variants: Russian; Range: 110–250 km; Speed: Mach 3.5; Quantity: 20–50 (Su-30MK2, 2025). - CM-90 (Nasir-1): Iranian; Range: 90 km; Speed: Mach 0.85. Venezuelan Boats with Anti-Ship Missiles: - Nasr-1: Peykaap/IRGC swarms; Range: 90 km; Speed: Mach 0.85. - Fajr-3: Fast, asymmetric boats; Range: 25 km; Speed: Mach 0.7. Regarding vessels, the biggest threat from Venezuela are Iranian fast attack boats and their anti-ship missiles. I see no space for the rest of the navy to operate in this scenario. They might not even leave the naval bases. Even with the U.S. deploying a partial force, it's far beyond Venezuelan capabilities, but I repeat: If the Venezuelan military agrees to fight, these anti-ship missiles and drones will give the American fleet a hard time. Yemen has far less against a much larger task force and still made a significant impact. The defense systems as S300VM, Buk-2M and Pechoras were deployed around several cities. Maduro isn't as popular as Chavez was, and Venezuela is going through a tough time now, without even the support of its neighbors, something that wasn't the case in the past.

Patricia Marins

99,420 次观看 • 11 个月前

Shared by Shikhar This is a recent incident that happened to me while I was returning from Goa to Hyderabad. This is a six-lane highway with a speed limit of 100 km/h, and I was cruising comfortably at around 92–93 km/h. Suddenly, a WagonR stopped right in the overtaking lane without any warning. The Force Trax in front of me braked hard but couldn’t stop in time and ended up hitting the WagonR from behind. Luckily, I was maintaining a sufficient safe distance, which gave me enough time to react and stop safely. Also, everyone in my car was wearing a seat belt, including my kid in the rear seat, which ensured that everyone remained safe and no one was injured. Thankfully, the people in both the WagonR and the Force Trax were also not injured. There was some heated argument between the drivers afterward, though. This incident is a perfect reminder of why maintaining a safe distance and staying alert on highways is so important. #driveresponsibly

Shared by Shikhar This is a recent incident that happened to me while I was returning from Goa to Hyderabad. This is a six-lane highway with a speed limit of 100 km/h, and I was cruising comfortably at around 92–93 km/h. Suddenly, a WagonR stopped right in the overtaking lane without any warning. The Force Trax in front of me braked hard but couldn’t stop in time and ended up hitting the WagonR from behind. Luckily, I was maintaining a sufficient safe distance, which gave me enough time to react and stop safely. Also, everyone in my car was wearing a seat belt, including my kid in the rear seat, which ensured that everyone remained safe and no one was injured. Thankfully, the people in both the WagonR and the Force Trax were also not injured. There was some heated argument between the drivers afterward, though. This incident is a perfect reminder of why maintaining a safe distance and staying alert on highways is so important. #driveresponsibly

Prateek Singh

38,166 次观看 • 19 天前

China's high-speed train has been running at a speed equal to that of an airplane taking off. The train's speed is around 600 km/h Look how far the world has come, while in our India, the Manuvadi folks are searching for a cancer cure in cow urine.

China's high-speed train has been running at a speed equal to that of an airplane taking off. The train's speed is around 600 km/h Look how far the world has come, while in our India, the Manuvadi folks are searching for a cancer cure in cow urine.

AmbedkariteIN

15,263 次观看 • 6 个月前