Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and... show more

Jibril

101,551 subscribers

113,290 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.

Heather Cooper

36,103 views • 1 year ago

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

98,259 views • 1 year ago

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 views • 3 months ago

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

124,365 views • 1 month ago

Fight side by side with John Wick in a $10M scene, you just need a photo and 10mins Seedance 2.0 literally broke Hollywood

Fight side by side with John Wick in a $10M scene, you just need a photo and 10mins Seedance 2.0 literally broke Hollywood

el.cine

40,122 views • 3 months ago

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,304 views • 4 months ago

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 10. Fixing AI Artifacts with Video Editing Use the multi-reference Vid2Vid capabilities of Seedance 2.0 to fix small defects and artifacts in AI-generated shots. Take a screenshot of the video frame containing the defect, upload it to GPT Image 2, and modify the image so the defect disappears. Flawed Video + Corrected Image: Seedance 2.0 will regenerate the video without the defect. GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 are now available on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts 👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 10. Fixing AI Artifacts with Video Editing Use the multi-reference Vid2Vid capabilities of Seedance 2.0 to fix small defects and artifacts in AI-generated shots. Take a screenshot of the video frame containing the defect, upload it to GPT Image 2, and modify the image so the defect disappears. Flawed Video + Corrected Image: Seedance 2.0 will regenerate the video without the defect. GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 are now available on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts 👇

VoxelPlot

21,930 views • 1 month ago

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

21,126 views • 14 days ago

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

67,548 views • 11 months ago

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 views • 3 months ago

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 views • 4 months ago

Seedance 2.0 and 2.0 Fast have arrived on Leonardo. Now you can take this tool and start directing every shot with more control. Here’s what creators are saying 2.0 is really good at: - Editing your videos using image and video references so you don’t have to prompt from scratch. - Controlling camera motion with precision. - Reproducing specific pans, zooms, tracking shots, etc. from video references. - Keep characters consistent from scene to scene. Any scene you can imagine is yours to create. Start creating.

Seedance 2.0 and 2.0 Fast have arrived on Leonardo. Now you can take this tool and start directing every shot with more control. Here’s what creators are saying 2.0 is really good at: - Editing your videos using image and video references so you don’t have to prompt from scratch. - Controlling camera motion with precision. - Reproducing specific pans, zooms, tracking shots, etc. from video references. - Keep characters consistent from scene to scene. Any scene you can imagine is yours to create. Start creating.

Leonardo.Ai

103,816 views • 1 month ago

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Jerrod Lew

15,795 views • 27 days ago

Image. Then motion. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 are now both live on Pollo AI. GPT Image 2 → structured layouts, sharp text, consistent characters — ready for ads, products, and social content. Seedance 2.0 → cinematic, stable, smooth video — straight from your image. From image to motion, the workflow is fast, seamless, and powerful.

Image. Then motion. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 are now both live on Pollo AI. GPT Image 2 → structured layouts, sharp text, consistent characters — ready for ads, products, and social content. Seedance 2.0 → cinematic, stable, smooth video — straight from your image. From image to motion, the workflow is fast, seamless, and powerful.

Pollo AI

431,569 views • 1 month ago

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,038 views • 3 months ago

Here's a movie trailer from ChatGPT Images 2.0. Create a storyboard style image with Images 2.0, and use it in Seedream 2.0 as a reference. Enter a prompt to create a 15 second video from the image. The model will use the character and environments. Quick tutorial:

Here's a movie trailer from ChatGPT Images 2.0. Create a storyboard style image with Images 2.0, and use it in Seedream 2.0 as a reference. Enter a prompt to create a 15 second video from the image. The model will use the character and environments. Quick tutorial:

Jerrod Lew

15,723 views • 1 month ago

🎨 Introducing fal Sandbox. You can now instantly run the same input across multiple models. Compare hundreds of models from fal’s platform side-by-side for speed, quality, and cost.

🎨 Introducing fal Sandbox. You can now instantly run the same input across multiple models. Compare hundreds of models from fal’s platform side-by-side for speed, quality, and cost.

fal

816,744 views • 8 months ago

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Kōda

34,325 views • 24 days ago

Side-by-side comparison of the Quinn promo video for hudcon’s and Off Campus what the fuck.

Side-by-side comparison of the Quinn promo video for hudcon’s and Off Campus what the fuck.

harley 🦇 | hudson’s stylist

1,663,027 views • 17 days ago

Google just released Veo 2, a new state-of-the-art AI video model. In testing, Veo beat OpenAI Sora in BOTH quality and prompt adherence. The video compilation below is 100% created by AI (more details in thread):

Google just released Veo 2, a new state-of-the-art AI video model. In testing, Veo beat OpenAI Sora in BOTH quality and prompt adherence. The video compilation below is 100% created by AI (more details in thread):

Rowan Cheung

249,907 views • 1 year ago