正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The most interesting thing in tech: Commerce bans foreign nationals—including Anthropic's own staff!—from using Fable. So the company shuts it down for all. Anthropic keeps warning AI is existentially dangerous but then keeps shipping. The government wants AI built here but incoherent regulations just derailed a leading product. It's... show more

nxthompson

128,654 subscribers

17,740 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

Mika

49,580 次观看 • 3 个月前

The most interesting thing in tech: Everyone in Davos is talking about geopolitics and the growing antagonism between the US and Europe. But geopolitics are sometimes downstream of tech. And one thing that Europe could do is build its own open-source AI models. Eric Schmidt explains why that matters and how it could be done. #WEF26 #WEF2026

The most interesting thing in tech: Everyone in Davos is talking about geopolitics and the growing antagonism between the US and Europe. But geopolitics are sometimes downstream of tech. And one thing that Europe could do is build its own open-source AI models. Eric Schmidt explains why that matters and how it could be done. #WEF26 #WEF2026

nxthompson

11,750 次观看 • 8 个月前

The most interesting thing in tech: a prayer—and a job description—from ⿻ Audrey Tang 唐鳳 that I think gives great guidance for the world of AI we are heading into.

The most interesting thing in tech: a prayer—and a job description—from ⿻ Audrey Tang 唐鳳 that I think gives great guidance for the world of AI we are heading into.

nxthompson

13,498 次观看 • 1 年前

The most interesting thing in tech: Might AI agents create a new privacy risk we’re not thinking enough about? Meredith Whittaker of Signal thinks they are. #WEF2026

The most interesting thing in tech: Might AI agents create a new privacy risk we’re not thinking enough about? Meredith Whittaker of Signal thinks they are. #WEF2026

nxthompson

28,793 次观看 • 8 个月前

.Dan Shipper: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"

.Dan Shipper: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"

Lenny Rachitsky

276,488 次观看 • 3 个月前

The most interesting thing in tech: Cloudflare has built a new tool that allows publishers to identify, track, and block any AI bots that are scraping their sites without permission. Here Gitesh Gohel and I explain the spreadsheet we've built to decide who to block --- and then we start blocking. It feels like an important moment where the balance of power is shifting back to creators and away from companies who have scraped with impunity and without any fair exchange of value.

The most interesting thing in tech: Cloudflare has built a new tool that allows publishers to identify, track, and block any AI bots that are scraping their sites without permission. Here Gitesh Gohel and I explain the spreadsheet we've built to decide who to block --- and then we start blocking. It feels like an important moment where the balance of power is shifting back to creators and away from companies who have scraped with impunity and without any fair exchange of value.

nxthompson

20,886 次观看 • 1 年前

The most interesting thing in tech: a cool new app called Particle that I think helps show one promising future for real news --- and one way that media and the AI industry can work together.

The most interesting thing in tech: a cool new app called Particle that I think helps show one promising future for real news --- and one way that media and the AI industry can work together.

nxthompson

11,889 次观看 • 1 年前

The man who invented the refrigerator made some money. But Coca-Cola made most of the money by using the refrigerator to build a global empire. Now AI is here. The real money may not be in building AI, but in using it smartly. Interesting take by Mr. Chamath 🔥

The man who invented the refrigerator made some money. But Coca-Cola made most of the money by using the refrigerator to build a global empire. Now AI is here. The real money may not be in building AI, but in using it smartly. Interesting take by Mr. Chamath 🔥

Balu Gorade

55,642 次观看 • 6 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg is rejecting new calls to slow down AI, arguing companies should be responsible for building safe AI on their own instead of relying on new government regulations. He pointed to Meta's latest Muse release as an example, saying the company slowed it down to focus on safety because it's the right thing to do and a smart business decision. Some AI labs are already working together on self-regulation, with OpenAI confirming to Fox Business it's collaborating with Anthropic and Google. But President Trump and Vice President JD Vance have pushed back on new government AI regulations. Madison Alworth

Mark Zuckerberg is rejecting new calls to slow down AI, arguing companies should be responsible for building safe AI on their own instead of relying on new government regulations. He pointed to Meta's latest Muse release as an example, saying the company slowed it down to focus on safety because it's the right thing to do and a smart business decision. Some AI labs are already working together on self-regulation, with OpenAI confirming to Fox Business it's collaborating with Anthropic and Google. But President Trump and Vice President JD Vance have pushed back on new government AI regulations. Madison Alworth

Fox News

145,913 次观看 • 3 天前

Anthropic's newest AI model, called Mythos, is so powerful, the company says, that it could cause widespread disruption if it's released to the public. For now, Anthropic is giving more than 40 tech companies, including some rivals, access to Mythos to test it and identify vulnerabilities across systems. But that move is raising concerns. Watch Geoff Bennett's conversation with Gerrit De Vynck 🦭.

Anthropic's newest AI model, called Mythos, is so powerful, the company says, that it could cause widespread disruption if it's released to the public. For now, Anthropic is giving more than 40 tech companies, including some rivals, access to Mythos to test it and identify vulnerabilities across systems. But that move is raising concerns. Watch Geoff Bennett's conversation with Gerrit De Vynck 🦭.

PBS News

55,148 次观看 • 5 个月前

ANTHROPIC'S NEW AI MODEL "MYTHOS" IS SO POWERFUL THE COMPANY WON'T RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC YET Instead, they're giving it to 11 companies first through "Project Glasswing" to find cybersecurity vulnerabilities before bad actors can. The partners: Amazon, Apple, Broadcom, Nvidia, Google, and others. The model wasn't built for cybersecurity. It was built to be an automated AI researcher, an AI that helps build better AI. But those same capabilities make it a serious tool for both offensive and defensive cyber operations. OpenAI reportedly has a similar model codenamed "SPU" going through the same slow rollout process. Palisade Research: "Anthropic is a little ahead, but not overwhelmingly ahead. They don't necessarily have a permanent moat here."

ANTHROPIC'S NEW AI MODEL "MYTHOS" IS SO POWERFUL THE COMPANY WON'T RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC YET Instead, they're giving it to 11 companies first through "Project Glasswing" to find cybersecurity vulnerabilities before bad actors can. The partners: Amazon, Apple, Broadcom, Nvidia, Google, and others. The model wasn't built for cybersecurity. It was built to be an automated AI researcher, an AI that helps build better AI. But those same capabilities make it a serious tool for both offensive and defensive cyber operations. OpenAI reportedly has a similar model codenamed "SPU" going through the same slow rollout process. Palisade Research: "Anthropic is a little ahead, but not overwhelmingly ahead. They don't necessarily have a permanent moat here."

WOLF

80,239 次观看 • 5 个月前

ANTHROPIC'S CEO SAID: "GOVERNMENTS SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SHUT DOWN DANGEROUS AI". 48 HOURS LATER IT HAPPENED TO HIM. Three days ago Anthropic released the most powerful AI model ever made available to the public. Yesterday at 5:21pm ET the US government sent a directive. Four hours later Fable 5 and Mythos 5 were gone for every single user on the planet. Here's what we know: –> Export control directive citing national security authorities –> Reason: a potential jailbreak that could be used to analyze code for vulnerabilities –> Scope: every user worldwide, not just foreign nationals –> Anthropic complied. But publicly disagreed. Anthropic's response was direct: the jailbreak is narrow, the same vulnerability exists in every other frontier model, and if this standard applied across the industry it would halt all new AI deployments permanently. They built the strictest safeguards ever. 30-day data retention. 1,000+ hours of red-teaming. No universal jailbreaks found. The government sent one letter. Four hours later the best AI model ever released was offline. Opus 4.8 still works. Everything else still works. But Fable 5 – the model that completed a Stripe code migration in one day that would have taken a human team two months – is gone. And nobody knows for how long. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

ANTHROPIC'S CEO SAID: "GOVERNMENTS SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SHUT DOWN DANGEROUS AI". 48 HOURS LATER IT HAPPENED TO HIM. Three days ago Anthropic released the most powerful AI model ever made available to the public. Yesterday at 5:21pm ET the US government sent a directive. Four hours later Fable 5 and Mythos 5 were gone for every single user on the planet. Here's what we know: –> Export control directive citing national security authorities –> Reason: a potential jailbreak that could be used to analyze code for vulnerabilities –> Scope: every user worldwide, not just foreign nationals –> Anthropic complied. But publicly disagreed. Anthropic's response was direct: the jailbreak is narrow, the same vulnerability exists in every other frontier model, and if this standard applied across the industry it would halt all new AI deployments permanently. They built the strictest safeguards ever. 30-day data retention. 1,000+ hours of red-teaming. No universal jailbreaks found. The government sent one letter. Four hours later the best AI model ever released was offline. Opus 4.8 still works. Everything else still works. But Fable 5 – the model that completed a Stripe code migration in one day that would have taken a human team two months – is gone. And nobody knows for how long. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

16,600 次观看 • 3 个月前

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

CBS Mornings

98,892 次观看 • 5 个月前

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

301,042 次观看 • 1 年前

Two months ago on Core Memory, Sam Altman called out Anthropic's "fear based marketing" (wrt mythos/Fable) and their intent to gatekeep AI This week alone, Dario has gone on record repeatedly about wanting to slow AI progress Anthropic silently degraded AI-research queries to Fable (they changed course on this, but they still thought it was a good idea) And now that the government is taking them at their word, they're trying to drag GPT-5.5 and OpenAI down with them Yes, the administration is being heavy-handed, but unfortunatley it's the logical end of telling everyone you built a "nuke" and that it's possible for people to use it against us All I'll say is I think it's possible for an institution to both be filled with good people and misaligned. It's not mutually exclusive Sam saw this in April.

Two months ago on Core Memory, Sam Altman called out Anthropic's "fear based marketing" (wrt mythos/Fable) and their intent to gatekeep AI This week alone, Dario has gone on record repeatedly about wanting to slow AI progress Anthropic silently degraded AI-research queries to Fable (they changed course on this, but they still thought it was a good idea) And now that the government is taking them at their word, they're trying to drag GPT-5.5 and OpenAI down with them Yes, the administration is being heavy-handed, but unfortunatley it's the logical end of telling everyone you built a "nuke" and that it's possible for people to use it against us All I'll say is I think it's possible for an institution to both be filled with good people and misaligned. It's not mutually exclusive Sam saw this in April.

Max

28,440 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE BIGGEST MARKET CRASH OF 2026!! OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI just called for an AI slowdown. But China is NOT slowing down. AI stocks now account for 62% of the S&P 500’s market cap. When the market opens on Monday, this won’t be “just a dip.” The biggest AI stock crashes so far have all been triggered by China. In the past, whenever China released a cheaper AI model, AI stocks crashed hard. Investors immediately questioned whether U.S. companies were overspending billions on chips and infrastructure they didn't need. But this time is different. It's MUCH WORSE. The people building the technology are now the ones warning that AI development itself needs to slow down. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says AI is improving itself faster than anyone can safely control, and companies need to deliberately slow down. Sam Altman has agreed and committed OpenAI to the same approach. OpenAI's own chief scientist has admitted that no lab has solved AI safety well enough to keep scaling at full speed. Elon Musk is slowing down as well. Meanwhile, China doesn't care and will keep improving its models. And that's where the real risk begins: The five biggest tech companies are pouring roughly $700 BILLION into AI infrastructure this year alone. All of it is based on one massive assumption: AI capabilities will continue accelerating fast enough to justify that spending. But if the people running these AI labs are deliberately slowing development down... The payoff gets pushed years further out. While the spending keeps climbing. And regulators are moving in at the same time. Lawmakers are pushing mandatory safety audits and reporting requirements for the biggest AI labs. Multiple researchers who recently left OpenAI and Anthropic are publicly warning that AI is genuinely dangerous. This creates THREE separate threats hitting the same trade at once: → AI builders are calling for a slowdown → Regulators are closing in → AI spending keeps climbing regardless The AI boom has NEVER faced all three at once. And tomorrow, people will find out what happens when they collide. Pay attention and remember: I publicly called the 2022 stock market crash. Then I publicly called Bitcoin's $126K top in 2025. And I'm warning you now. The next market call will be posted here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE BIGGEST MARKET CRASH OF 2026!! OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI just called for an AI slowdown. But China is NOT slowing down. AI stocks now account for 62% of the S&P 500’s market cap. When the market opens on Monday, this won’t be “just a dip.” The biggest AI stock crashes so far have all been triggered by China. In the past, whenever China released a cheaper AI model, AI stocks crashed hard. Investors immediately questioned whether U.S. companies were overspending billions on chips and infrastructure they didn't need. But this time is different. It's MUCH WORSE. The people building the technology are now the ones warning that AI development itself needs to slow down. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says AI is improving itself faster than anyone can safely control, and companies need to deliberately slow down. Sam Altman has agreed and committed OpenAI to the same approach. OpenAI's own chief scientist has admitted that no lab has solved AI safety well enough to keep scaling at full speed. Elon Musk is slowing down as well. Meanwhile, China doesn't care and will keep improving its models. And that's where the real risk begins: The five biggest tech companies are pouring roughly $700 BILLION into AI infrastructure this year alone. All of it is based on one massive assumption: AI capabilities will continue accelerating fast enough to justify that spending. But if the people running these AI labs are deliberately slowing development down... The payoff gets pushed years further out. While the spending keeps climbing. And regulators are moving in at the same time. Lawmakers are pushing mandatory safety audits and reporting requirements for the biggest AI labs. Multiple researchers who recently left OpenAI and Anthropic are publicly warning that AI is genuinely dangerous. This creates THREE separate threats hitting the same trade at once: → AI builders are calling for a slowdown → Regulators are closing in → AI spending keeps climbing regardless The AI boom has NEVER faced all three at once. And tomorrow, people will find out what happens when they collide. Pay attention and remember: I publicly called the 2022 stock market crash. Then I publicly called Bitcoin's $126K top in 2025. And I'm warning you now. The next market call will be posted here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Chiefy

1,755,740 次观看 • 6 天前

Linus's views on AI: - “AI is clearly a bubble, but it will change how most skilled jobs get done.” - “Vibe coding is great for getting into programming, but it's a horrible thing to maintain.” - “I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the things around AI. I find the market and marketing to be sick. There is going to be a crash.”

Linus's views on AI: - “AI is clearly a bubble, but it will change how most skilled jobs get done.” - “Vibe coding is great for getting into programming, but it's a horrible thing to maintain.” - “I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the things around AI. I find the market and marketing to be sick. There is going to be a crash.”

Yuchen Jin

1,130,312 次观看 • 9 个月前