正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The Venice team has been teasing 'Minds' lately, so David Hoffman asks "What are Minds?" Jon Venice: "Minds are custom AI experiences" "We have a subset of really strong power users that understand these models really well. They're really good at chaining these things together in such a way,... using system prompts in certain ways, to create a toolset that lets them get a much better output from the same prompt, versus just giving it to a kind of naked model without any of these things. And so we're creating tools for users to create these experiences and then potentially even to monetize them. And we think in many ways this is going to become one of the more popular ways for people to use AI and that there will likely only be a small subset of these kind of power users who kind of become creators, although we're trying to make the tools easy enough for them to create whatever they can and they want. But that a ton of consumers will be very interested in this as kind of our thesis, that they will want to use these custom experiences because they will get a substantially better output."show more

Bankless

390,236 subscribers

12,302 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

One of the many things that I do that makes me very happy. Coaching these boys and giving them opportunities in a village that doesn’t really get much. Making these boys believe that they have a space in this world and in football. United Warriors FC will grow to be a big team.

One of the many things that I do that makes me very happy. Coaching these boys and giving them opportunities in a village that doesn’t really get much. Making these boys believe that they have a space in this world and in football. United Warriors FC will grow to be a big team.

A Dog That Bites

170,862 次观看 • 3 年前

"The Matrix is a system ... These people are still the part of the system and that makes them our enemy, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."

"The Matrix is a system ... These people are still the part of the system and that makes them our enemy, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."

SMX 🇺🇸

33,211 次观看 • 1 年前

Platner: We are all beginning to realize — right, left, Republican, Democrat — we are just there to be exploited by a small group of people who, in some ways, are kind of running the world for their own benefit. And the Epstein files show that in glaring fashion. The only way we’re going to move forward is by building the political power to hold all these people accountable and make sure that that kind of wealth doesn’t just get to be accrued anymore.

Platner: We are all beginning to realize — right, left, Republican, Democrat — we are just there to be exploited by a small group of people who, in some ways, are kind of running the world for their own benefit. And the Epstein files show that in glaring fashion. The only way we’re going to move forward is by building the political power to hold all these people accountable and make sure that that kind of wealth doesn’t just get to be accrued anymore.

Acyn

273,294 次观看 • 6 个月前

David Friedberg explains why Mamdani’s government grocery stores will actually succeed in the short term, and why that’s the entire point. They don’t need them to work long-term. They just need the spectacle in time for 2028. “I think that these things are going to create a radical Spectacle and exuberance for socialist policies that’s going to kind of light a fire for socialism around the country… they will be deemed a point of success, and they will end up being a big part of the fuel for the DSA going into 2028.”

David Friedberg explains why Mamdani’s government grocery stores will actually succeed in the short term, and why that’s the entire point. They don’t need them to work long-term. They just need the spectacle in time for 2028. “I think that these things are going to create a radical Spectacle and exuberance for socialist policies that’s going to kind of light a fire for socialism around the country… they will be deemed a point of success, and they will end up being a big part of the fuel for the DSA going into 2028.”

jay plemons

135,746 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 ELON ON AI: “IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT, YOU CAN HAVE IT - THAT WILL BE THE FUTURE” "I'm Confident that AI and robotics will continue to advance -and they are advancing very rapidly- working will become optional. People will be able to have any goods or services they want. If you can think of it, you can have it. But at a certain point, AI will actually saturate everything humans can think of. And then it becomes a situation where AI is doing things for AI and robotics are doing things for AI and robotics, because they are running out of things to do to make humans happy. Because there is a limit, there are only so many people and only so much food. If you can think of it, you can have it. That will be the future." Source: Elon Musk, Nikhil Kamath

🇺🇸 ELON ON AI: “IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT, YOU CAN HAVE IT - THAT WILL BE THE FUTURE” "I'm Confident that AI and robotics will continue to advance -and they are advancing very rapidly- working will become optional. People will be able to have any goods or services they want. If you can think of it, you can have it. But at a certain point, AI will actually saturate everything humans can think of. And then it becomes a situation where AI is doing things for AI and robotics are doing things for AI and robotics, because they are running out of things to do to make humans happy. Because there is a limit, there are only so many people and only so much food. If you can think of it, you can have it. That will be the future." Source: Elon Musk, Nikhil Kamath

Mario Nawfal

1,398,827 次观看 • 9 个月前

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017

Mario Nawfal

105,055 次观看 • 1 年前

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

American Optimist

13,182 次观看 • 5 个月前

Danny Sheehan says the Psionic program recruited children to bring down actual ET craft because military pilots were having trouble. He says there has been substantial misconduct with the children that have been recruited And also the occupants of the ET craft Source -“New Thinking Allowed 🔗 in comments Danny -“Now the other problem is, of course, that that the, the fact that these vehicles are run by, by te telepathic communication on the part of the pilot, that they were in fact having substantial difficulties in having the trained pilots that they have in the Air Force, for example, and in the Navy, that somehow they weren't, they weren't capable of the kind of consciousness that was necessary to communicate and navigate these craft.” “And so what they did is they went out and they started trying to recruit people as you point out that they've actually gone and tried to find children who demonstrate these kind of psychic capabilities, and that they began a, a sub-program of, this entire effort to try to gear up people who have these capabilities and recruit them to actually be pilots for these, these craft. And, and so that they could bring down the actual ET craft themselves.” “Not a mockup of them, or not something that's like them, but the actual craft themselves. And, and have young children be trained over years to learn how to fly these things because of the high levels of consciousness and psychic abilities that they've had. Now, I'm, I'm not at liberty to go into some of the details about this, because the means by which I've acquired this information put certain people at risk of, of revealing who they are. But there have been some very substantial, there's been some very substantial misconduct involved in working with these children and trying to train them to, to pilot these craft.” “And there have been some substantial misconduct with regard to the way they've treated the occupants of these craft to the point of capturing them, killing them, you know, subjecting them to all kinds of coercive activities, you know, and, and our new Paradigm Institute is working with people in the Justice Department now, the Federal Justice Department, to try to bring about a major investigation to determine what some of those activities have been so that we can purge those activities from the present system that they're working with and, and that's a, that's a whole kind of darker dimension of this thing.”

Danny Sheehan says the Psionic program recruited children to bring down actual ET craft because military pilots were having trouble. He says there has been substantial misconduct with the children that have been recruited And also the occupants of the ET craft Source -“New Thinking Allowed 🔗 in comments Danny -“Now the other problem is, of course, that that the, the fact that these vehicles are run by, by te telepathic communication on the part of the pilot, that they were in fact having substantial difficulties in having the trained pilots that they have in the Air Force, for example, and in the Navy, that somehow they weren't, they weren't capable of the kind of consciousness that was necessary to communicate and navigate these craft.” “And so what they did is they went out and they started trying to recruit people as you point out that they've actually gone and tried to find children who demonstrate these kind of psychic capabilities, and that they began a, a sub-program of, this entire effort to try to gear up people who have these capabilities and recruit them to actually be pilots for these, these craft. And, and so that they could bring down the actual ET craft themselves.” “Not a mockup of them, or not something that's like them, but the actual craft themselves. And, and have young children be trained over years to learn how to fly these things because of the high levels of consciousness and psychic abilities that they've had. Now, I'm, I'm not at liberty to go into some of the details about this, because the means by which I've acquired this information put certain people at risk of, of revealing who they are. But there have been some very substantial, there's been some very substantial misconduct involved in working with these children and trying to train them to, to pilot these craft.” “And there have been some substantial misconduct with regard to the way they've treated the occupants of these craft to the point of capturing them, killing them, you know, subjecting them to all kinds of coercive activities, you know, and, and our new Paradigm Institute is working with people in the Justice Department now, the Federal Justice Department, to try to bring about a major investigation to determine what some of those activities have been so that we can purge those activities from the present system that they're working with and, and that's a, that's a whole kind of darker dimension of this thing.”

neandrewthal

99,419 次观看 • 1 年前

Richard Dolan, on our need for collective self-reflection as we face the alien presence. 👽 "Here's another scenario, because I love to speculate about this. So what if these beings have an IQ of like 500+. Like they’re orders of magnitude beyond us. And they're telepathic, so they can crawl inside your mind. And they're part of their own hive mind so that they have instant access to a complete like encyclopedia, a Galactica Encyclopedia of information. And they have an emotional disposition that makes it so that maybe they don't laugh at all of your jokes. And they look at you and they can see your naked soul before them. So does it matter if they look human or not? If you're sitting in a room across from one of them and they're just staring at you? Well, that would be very intimidating, I think. And that doesn't strike me as impossible a scenario. "So if they are like that, we are going to have to find our own center of being. I mean, some people might think this sounds very wishy washy, but I've really come to believe that it is probably essential that, for us to deal with them, we need to have a very much better understanding of ourselves. "For example, think of the kind of society that we create. Constant stimulation. Constant screen attachment. Screen addiction. Waiting for the notifications. Bing bing bing. The endorphins. And we're constantly chasing, chasing after whatever we're chasing in this world of ours. Like the hamster wheel that you never get off of. That's the world for many of us. That is not a society conducive to self-examination and self-exploration. When you are dealing with a series of intelligences that are probably leaps and bounds beyond our operational capacity to begin with. "So if we're going actually to deal with them in any way that's meaningful, we probably need to just stop and engage in some seriously deep self-reflection about what we are. And then maybe that means spirituality, like it probably does, to be honest. And the kind of system that we've developed in our world, I just, at this point in my life, I don't think is all that conducive to us being able to effectively, psychologically relate to these other beings."

Richard Dolan, on our need for collective self-reflection as we face the alien presence. 👽 "Here's another scenario, because I love to speculate about this. So what if these beings have an IQ of like 500+. Like they’re orders of magnitude beyond us. And they're telepathic, so they can crawl inside your mind. And they're part of their own hive mind so that they have instant access to a complete like encyclopedia, a Galactica Encyclopedia of information. And they have an emotional disposition that makes it so that maybe they don't laugh at all of your jokes. And they look at you and they can see your naked soul before them. So does it matter if they look human or not? If you're sitting in a room across from one of them and they're just staring at you? Well, that would be very intimidating, I think. And that doesn't strike me as impossible a scenario. "So if they are like that, we are going to have to find our own center of being. I mean, some people might think this sounds very wishy washy, but I've really come to believe that it is probably essential that, for us to deal with them, we need to have a very much better understanding of ourselves. "For example, think of the kind of society that we create. Constant stimulation. Constant screen attachment. Screen addiction. Waiting for the notifications. Bing bing bing. The endorphins. And we're constantly chasing, chasing after whatever we're chasing in this world of ours. Like the hamster wheel that you never get off of. That's the world for many of us. That is not a society conducive to self-examination and self-exploration. When you are dealing with a series of intelligences that are probably leaps and bounds beyond our operational capacity to begin with. "So if we're going actually to deal with them in any way that's meaningful, we probably need to just stop and engage in some seriously deep self-reflection about what we are. And then maybe that means spirituality, like it probably does, to be honest. And the kind of system that we've developed in our world, I just, at this point in my life, I don't think is all that conducive to us being able to effectively, psychologically relate to these other beings."

David Windt

54,218 次观看 • 1 年前

David Sacks: “FDA for AI” is fake news, but here’s why it’s making headlines @jason: “ Who's leading Trump down the path of regulation and creating this AI FDA?” David Sacks: “I think there's several things going on here. The first one is, there's a lot of fake news. This whole idea of an FDA for AI, I don't think any senior official supports it. Certainly, I don't think that's the way the president thinks about these issues. He's the most pro-innovation president we've ever had. And the White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, just put out a statement last night that I think pretty much shoots this down. Second, there's another thing going on, which is a straw manning of what the Trump administration did on AI in its first year. In the same way that they want to spin this FDA for AI, they're also trying to spin what we did as this completely laissez-faire attitude, where there'd be no regulations whatsoever, nor guardrails. It's a way of criticizing what we did. They're trying to portray it as unsafe. In fact, if you look, on March 20th, the White House released a national AI regulatory framework in which we put out a four-page bulleted list of legislation that we would support. So we have not been against every conceivable regulation or every conceivable law, we just believe that there should be specific solutions to specific problems, as opposed to a giant power grab by Washington that would squash innovation. Point number three is, there is a legitimate thing happening here with, let's call it Mythos or cyber. Within 3-6 months, all the major frontier labs, including Chinese models, will have cyber capabilities. In response to that, we do need there to be a hardening of systems, and we do need there to be a scanning of codebases to find these vulnerabilities and patch them before the hackers do it. Because the hackers will have these capabilities in a matter of months. That's a certainty. So we do need a response to that. Now, my view on what should that response be, first of all, we should want the government and the private sector to work cooperatively, and I think they are. What we should be doing, I think, is getting these tools, Mythos, and then the OpenAI model, and others like it, in the hands of our cybersecurity industry. And by the way, not just the public companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, although certainly they're two of the most noteworthy, but there's also some incredibly strong startups on the way up. We need to get these tools into their hands as quickly as possible because they're a force multiplier for all the companies out there that aren't that good at cybersecurity, they can use these companies as vendors. And just one last point on this whole thing is, both Anthropic and OpenAI acted responsibly here. No one was trying to release these super powerful models. So in a way, all the people who are saying that we need pre-release approvals for models, they're trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. Yes, we do have this cyber issue, but that is a problem that we will solve over the next six months. What they're trying to do is use that issue to try and create a permanent new infrastructure in Washington. The classic 'never let a crisis go to waste' strategy.”

David Sacks: “FDA for AI” is fake news, but here’s why it’s making headlines @jason: “ Who's leading Trump down the path of regulation and creating this AI FDA?” David Sacks: “I think there's several things going on here. The first one is, there's a lot of fake news. This whole idea of an FDA for AI, I don't think any senior official supports it. Certainly, I don't think that's the way the president thinks about these issues. He's the most pro-innovation president we've ever had. And the White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, just put out a statement last night that I think pretty much shoots this down. Second, there's another thing going on, which is a straw manning of what the Trump administration did on AI in its first year. In the same way that they want to spin this FDA for AI, they're also trying to spin what we did as this completely laissez-faire attitude, where there'd be no regulations whatsoever, nor guardrails. It's a way of criticizing what we did. They're trying to portray it as unsafe. In fact, if you look, on March 20th, the White House released a national AI regulatory framework in which we put out a four-page bulleted list of legislation that we would support. So we have not been against every conceivable regulation or every conceivable law, we just believe that there should be specific solutions to specific problems, as opposed to a giant power grab by Washington that would squash innovation. Point number three is, there is a legitimate thing happening here with, let's call it Mythos or cyber. Within 3-6 months, all the major frontier labs, including Chinese models, will have cyber capabilities. In response to that, we do need there to be a hardening of systems, and we do need there to be a scanning of codebases to find these vulnerabilities and patch them before the hackers do it. Because the hackers will have these capabilities in a matter of months. That's a certainty. So we do need a response to that. Now, my view on what should that response be, first of all, we should want the government and the private sector to work cooperatively, and I think they are. What we should be doing, I think, is getting these tools, Mythos, and then the OpenAI model, and others like it, in the hands of our cybersecurity industry. And by the way, not just the public companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, although certainly they're two of the most noteworthy, but there's also some incredibly strong startups on the way up. We need to get these tools into their hands as quickly as possible because they're a force multiplier for all the companies out there that aren't that good at cybersecurity, they can use these companies as vendors. And just one last point on this whole thing is, both Anthropic and OpenAI acted responsibly here. No one was trying to release these super powerful models. So in a way, all the people who are saying that we need pre-release approvals for models, they're trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. Yes, we do have this cyber issue, but that is a problem that we will solve over the next six months. What they're trying to do is use that issue to try and create a permanent new infrastructure in Washington. The classic 'never let a crisis go to waste' strategy.”

The All-In Podcast

150,106 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jeff Bezos reveals why he thinks AI will cause a labor shortage, not mass unemployment "There's so many people who are afraid AI is going to take their job. I think there's going to be a labor shortage as a result" "All these smart people keep saying there's going to be no more radiologists because AI can read X-rays better, no more software engineers because AI can program better. These people are wrong" "What's really going to happen is it's going to elevate all of these people. You've been digging out a basement with a shovel, and somebody is about to hand you a bulldozer" "We're going to have so much productivity that a lot of people with two-earner income households, one of them is going to drop out of the workforce" "I predict we will actually have deflation of certain core things. Food will get cheaper and housing construction will get cheaper"

Jeff Bezos reveals why he thinks AI will cause a labor shortage, not mass unemployment "There's so many people who are afraid AI is going to take their job. I think there's going to be a labor shortage as a result" "All these smart people keep saying there's going to be no more radiologists because AI can read X-rays better, no more software engineers because AI can program better. These people are wrong" "What's really going to happen is it's going to elevate all of these people. You've been digging out a basement with a shovel, and somebody is about to hand you a bulldozer" "We're going to have so much productivity that a lot of people with two-earner income households, one of them is going to drop out of the workforce" "I predict we will actually have deflation of certain core things. Food will get cheaper and housing construction will get cheaper"

Jaynit

506,665 次观看 • 3 个月前

Do you see all these campers? There are acres of these campers in Florida. They are owned by FEMA Instead of being handed out to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton victims, they just sat here “According to other sources, they just kind of hang out there to the point that sometimes grass grows up past them because they're never handed out. They're literally everywhere, like acres of these campers.” “So it's not that they don't have money. They just don't wanna hang them out. Your taxpayer dollars paid for these, and we need to make sure that they are used for what they're intended to be used for because this is kind of crazy.”

Do you see all these campers? There are acres of these campers in Florida. They are owned by FEMA Instead of being handed out to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton victims, they just sat here “According to other sources, they just kind of hang out there to the point that sometimes grass grows up past them because they're never handed out. They're literally everywhere, like acres of these campers.” “So it's not that they don't have money. They just don't wanna hang them out. Your taxpayer dollars paid for these, and we need to make sure that they are used for what they're intended to be used for because this is kind of crazy.”

Wall Street Apes

421,669 次观看 • 1 年前

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

39,177 次观看 • 1 个月前

NEW: Joe Lonsdale at Forum debate at RNC midterms takes on right-wing doomers and calls for "big daddy government" to smother AI and data centers. Joe Allen: However flawed it is, at least the desire to bring these guys [Big Tech / AI labs] under control is best met, however flawed it is, through big daddy government. Joe Lonsdale: I appreciate that perspective, that you're very negative on it. Overall, I think you're attributing a little too much to like the ChatGPT consumer interaction and not enough to the way in which industry is using AI to bring back manufacturing, to solve problems, to raise productivity. The only way we all get wealthier is raising productivity. We're already seeing very clearly signs that it has definitely led to job growth, not job destruction. I agree with you -- there are some people running some of these tech companies who seem to have this doomer PR, which as far as I can tell, is retarded. And if you want to punish them for that, I kind of empathize with you... But don't let them trick you. Because what a lot of them want is a big regulatory apparatus that they can capture. Because if you do create something at the federal level, you can bet the guys with trillions of dollars in their pockets can hire a thousand people that are going to find ways to capture that and use it against the rest of us. We have to be very careful, not just to do what the left wants and give the government all this power, which then will get captured, and then we're all screwed. We are the greatest nation on earth, in my opinion, in large part because of our freedom and our property rights and our checks on government power, our checks on corporate power as well. And because of our innovation sector -- it's tied to all of that. If you're on the left, you're worried about the companies. If you're on the right, you're more worried about government ... I think we're really screwed when the companies and the governments work together ...when those guys get together and come after us. That is what they want. So let's just be really, really careful. Whatever we put in place prioritizes competence, and it's not something they're going to be able to capture and use against us.

NEW: Joe Lonsdale at Forum debate at RNC midterms takes on right-wing doomers and calls for "big daddy government" to smother AI and data centers. Joe Allen: However flawed it is, at least the desire to bring these guys [Big Tech / AI labs] under control is best met, however flawed it is, through big daddy government. Joe Lonsdale: I appreciate that perspective, that you're very negative on it. Overall, I think you're attributing a little too much to like the ChatGPT consumer interaction and not enough to the way in which industry is using AI to bring back manufacturing, to solve problems, to raise productivity. The only way we all get wealthier is raising productivity. We're already seeing very clearly signs that it has definitely led to job growth, not job destruction. I agree with you -- there are some people running some of these tech companies who seem to have this doomer PR, which as far as I can tell, is retarded. And if you want to punish them for that, I kind of empathize with you... But don't let them trick you. Because what a lot of them want is a big regulatory apparatus that they can capture. Because if you do create something at the federal level, you can bet the guys with trillions of dollars in their pockets can hire a thousand people that are going to find ways to capture that and use it against the rest of us. We have to be very careful, not just to do what the left wants and give the government all this power, which then will get captured, and then we're all screwed. We are the greatest nation on earth, in my opinion, in large part because of our freedom and our property rights and our checks on government power, our checks on corporate power as well. And because of our innovation sector -- it's tied to all of that. If you're on the left, you're worried about the companies. If you're on the right, you're more worried about government ... I think we're really screwed when the companies and the governments work together ...when those guys get together and come after us. That is what they want. So let's just be really, really careful. Whatever we put in place prioritizes competence, and it's not something they're going to be able to capture and use against us.

American Optimist

121,063 次观看 • 2 天前

Kalonzo Musyoka: I would go back to NHIF and stop the stealing because this money is going to people’s pockets, and we do not know how much money is enough for some of these people. I hear that a lot of them are beginning to see that the inevitable will happen, so they are beginning to make ways of exiting even before they are caught up #CitizenSundayLive

Kalonzo Musyoka: I would go back to NHIF and stop the stealing because this money is going to people’s pockets, and we do not know how much money is enough for some of these people. I hear that a lot of them are beginning to see that the inevitable will happen, so they are beginning to make ways of exiting even before they are caught up #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

14,882 次观看 • 5 个月前

"We're careening towards a brick wall. The end of a supercycle is here." - Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin "The start of the next supercycle is likely... going to look like moving the economy onto decentralized rails." "AI is going to supercharge all aspects of science, and we're going to be living in a world that is indescribable at this point by 20 years from now." "I'm an optimist and an idealist, and I think even though we're moving through incredibly difficult times... that's kind of necessary because things are so broken that they have to kind of fall apart, kind of collapse, in order to make way for better systems."

"We're careening towards a brick wall. The end of a supercycle is here." - Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin "The start of the next supercycle is likely... going to look like moving the economy onto decentralized rails." "AI is going to supercharge all aspects of science, and we're going to be living in a world that is indescribable at this point by 20 years from now." "I'm an optimist and an idealist, and I think even though we're moving through incredibly difficult times... that's kind of necessary because things are so broken that they have to kind of fall apart, kind of collapse, in order to make way for better systems."

TBPN

41,906 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk: There are all kinds of NGOs trying to eliminate poverty. But AI and robotics will actually succeed. “People often talk about sort of eliminating poverty and that kind of thing. How long have they been talking about that? There's lots of talk; there are lots of NGOs sort of trying to do these things but really not succeeding. And the evidence speaks for itself. But AI and humanoid robots will actually eliminate poverty. And Tesla won't be the only one that makes them. I think Tesla will pioneer this, but there will be many other companies that make humanoid robots. But there is only basically one way to make everyone wealthy, and that is AI and robotics.” U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, November 19, 2025

Elon Musk: There are all kinds of NGOs trying to eliminate poverty. But AI and robotics will actually succeed. “People often talk about sort of eliminating poverty and that kind of thing. How long have they been talking about that? There's lots of talk; there are lots of NGOs sort of trying to do these things but really not succeeding. And the evidence speaks for itself. But AI and humanoid robots will actually eliminate poverty. And Tesla won't be the only one that makes them. I think Tesla will pioneer this, but there will be many other companies that make humanoid robots. But there is only basically one way to make everyone wealthy, and that is AI and robotics.” U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, November 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

13,858 次观看 • 8 个月前

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

33,281 次观看 • 6 个月前