正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This USA citizen was exercising his 1st Amendment rights when this arrogant tyrant cop and Karen thinks they are the law! These are the officers that need more training on the US Constitution. Does he make anyone else's skin crawl?

AmericanPapaBear™

592,545 subscribers

731,414 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

David Brown📷🐊 的头像

David Brown📷🐊1 年前

Get a life dude! These people who intentionally try to start sh*t with people just so they can put it on the internet are losers!

AmericanPapaBear 的头像

AmericanPapaBear1 年前

It’s a first amendment audit. We have to expose those who violate and don’t honor our rights

Jen 的头像

Jen1 年前

The guy filming this kind of a d*ck, let's just be honest. Do your thing but you don't have to be antagonizing people in order to do it and he only does it to get filmed reactions.

AmericanPapaBear 的头像

AmericanPapaBear1 年前

I respect your opinion to think that. But I also respect that man’s rights to do what he did.

Brandon Joe Williams 的头像

Brandon Joe Williams1 年前

Tired of paying taxes? Tired of the police pulling you over on the side of the road? Tired of being pushed around and not knowing what you can do about it? My absolutely FREE course covers all the above and much more! By the end you will be filing your own lawsuits.

BillieCotter 的头像

BillieCotter1 年前

Nah…I wouldn’t have talked to the officer that way. The officer was being respectful until the guy started going off on name & badge number rant

AmericanPapaBear 的头像

AmericanPapaBear1 年前

He should know our rights and informed the woman then left. Instead he wanted to push the buttons of the guy filming

Thomas Paine Band 的头像

Thomas Paine Band1 年前

😂🤣😂 This terrible excuse for a cop got schooled! He should be furious at the person who called the police for a non-crime and wasting the time and resources of the Police.

AmericanPapaBear 的头像

AmericanPapaBear1 年前

He should know our rights and informed the woman then left. Instead he wanted to push the buttons of the guy filming

Lori 的头像

Lori1 年前

What am I missing here? Guy didn’t break any laws. Do the bank people realize they are on camera 24/7? But - guy with an iPhone….let’s call the popo. The cop was kinda smarmy, too, no?

AmericanPapaBear 的头像

AmericanPapaBear1 年前

Bingo

相关视频

This independent journalist has his first amendment rights violated by some tyrant police officers who don’t understand the law or the constitution. They think that policy trumps law in this country. Should he sue the department for this?

This independent journalist has his first amendment rights violated by some tyrant police officers who don’t understand the law or the constitution. They think that policy trumps law in this country. Should he sue the department for this?

AmericanPapaBear™

824,269 次观看 • 1 年前

Watters: When they lose cases like this they lose the moral high ground because the entire message has been this: Donald Trump is a tyrant and he is trampling on the constitution. And he's destroying everyone's rights and he's breaking the law. It turns out when these rulings come down, it's the left that are breaking the law

Watters: When they lose cases like this they lose the moral high ground because the entire message has been this: Donald Trump is a tyrant and he is trampling on the constitution. And he's destroying everyone's rights and he's breaking the law. It turns out when these rulings come down, it's the left that are breaking the law

Acyn

48,490 次观看 • 1 年前

As much as you may hate 1st amendment auditors, this shows who upholds the constitution. The cop is phenomenal, and the lawyer is a part of corporate law. He doesn't care about the Constitution.

As much as you may hate 1st amendment auditors, this shows who upholds the constitution. The cop is phenomenal, and the lawyer is a part of corporate law. He doesn't care about the Constitution.

SkriptkeeperElect

13,672 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 Full clip from before they attacked me and right after when the useless white shirt cops told me they couldn’t help me because of officer safety! This was a coordinated attack on a citizen that was peacefully exercising his 1st amendment! They say peaceful protest and I say BULLSHIT!

🚨 Full clip from before they attacked me and right after when the useless white shirt cops told me they couldn’t help me because of officer safety! This was a coordinated attack on a citizen that was peacefully exercising his 1st amendment! They say peaceful protest and I say BULLSHIT!

Tommyboi4209

13,635 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen in, Vancouver, WA, was pulled over by FIVE police cars for legally observing and documenting ICE agents… then had to explain the Constitution to the officers detaining him… And it was all caught on video. In the video, an ICE agent didn’t like being watched, called local police… Then suddenly, the U.S. citizen, exercising his constitutional rights, was surrounded by FIVE cop cars. And most ridiculous part? The officers who claimed “reasonable suspicion” for detaining the U.S. citizen, could not even answer this simple question… Is it legal to observe and record law enforcement? After refusing to answer, and arguing about the First Amendment for several minutes, the officer finally admitted… Yes. It is legal to observe and record law enforcement. So, if it’s a legally protected activity… then why was this U.S. citizen detained? Federal courts, across the country, have repeatedly recognized that the First Amendment protects the right to record and observe government officials… including law enforcement performing their duties in public… as long as you aren’t interfering with them. That means, local police, and ICE agents, don’t get to decide when that right applies… They don’t get to ignore the Constitution because they’re uncomfortable with public oversight. But this isn’t the only incident. Across America, we’re watching local law enforcement work alongside ICE, while ordinary citizens, journalists, and legal observers are being questioned, detained, and intimidated for exercising their constitutional rights. And the fact that a U.S. citizen had to educate the officers, who were detaining HIM, about the Constitution… should outrage every single person. Because if the people enforcing the law don’t understand the constitutional rights they’re sworn to protect… That puts every American in danger.

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen in, Vancouver, WA, was pulled over by FIVE police cars for legally observing and documenting ICE agents… then had to explain the Constitution to the officers detaining him… And it was all caught on video. In the video, an ICE agent didn’t like being watched, called local police… Then suddenly, the U.S. citizen, exercising his constitutional rights, was surrounded by FIVE cop cars. And most ridiculous part? The officers who claimed “reasonable suspicion” for detaining the U.S. citizen, could not even answer this simple question… Is it legal to observe and record law enforcement? After refusing to answer, and arguing about the First Amendment for several minutes, the officer finally admitted… Yes. It is legal to observe and record law enforcement. So, if it’s a legally protected activity… then why was this U.S. citizen detained? Federal courts, across the country, have repeatedly recognized that the First Amendment protects the right to record and observe government officials… including law enforcement performing their duties in public… as long as you aren’t interfering with them. That means, local police, and ICE agents, don’t get to decide when that right applies… They don’t get to ignore the Constitution because they’re uncomfortable with public oversight. But this isn’t the only incident. Across America, we’re watching local law enforcement work alongside ICE, while ordinary citizens, journalists, and legal observers are being questioned, detained, and intimidated for exercising their constitutional rights. And the fact that a U.S. citizen had to educate the officers, who were detaining HIM, about the Constitution… should outrage every single person. Because if the people enforcing the law don’t understand the constitutional rights they’re sworn to protect… That puts every American in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,447 次观看 • 1 个月前

WATCH: This man was recording in the public at City Hall and was literally THROWN DOWN STAIRS and out of the building for it. The chief then says that he understands he has his 2ND AMENDMENT rights. REALLY GUY? 2ND?? Did they violate his 1st Amendment rights?

WATCH: This man was recording in the public at City Hall and was literally THROWN DOWN STAIRS and out of the building for it. The chief then says that he understands he has his 2ND AMENDMENT rights. REALLY GUY? 2ND?? Did they violate his 1st Amendment rights?

AmericanPapaBear™

1,068,795 次观看 • 1 年前

Republicans are so desperate and scared of the American people exercising our First Amendment rights they are calling No Kings—- “Hate America Rallies” I say F-THAT. We LOVE this country! 🇺🇸 Let’s make history on Oct 18th!

Republicans are so desperate and scared of the American people exercising our First Amendment rights they are calling No Kings—- “Hate America Rallies” I say F-THAT. We LOVE this country! 🇺🇸 Let’s make history on Oct 18th!

Tara Setmayer 🌻 🇺🇸

408,824 次观看 • 9 个月前

Jesse Ventura: “You’re telling us that we’re not following immigration laws when you’re not following the Constitution. So you’re telling me immigration laws are higher than the Constitution? That’s what in essence they are telling us, that we in Minneapolis are out of line while they sit and violate the 1st Amendment, they violate the 2nd Amendment, they violate the 4th Amendment, and they violate the 10th Amendment. I wanted to say to Homan, will you leave if I offer you a $50K bribe?” (Video: Paul Rieckhoff🇺🇸🇺🇦)

Jesse Ventura: “You’re telling us that we’re not following immigration laws when you’re not following the Constitution. So you’re telling me immigration laws are higher than the Constitution? That’s what in essence they are telling us, that we in Minneapolis are out of line while they sit and violate the 1st Amendment, they violate the 2nd Amendment, they violate the 4th Amendment, and they violate the 10th Amendment. I wanted to say to Homan, will you leave if I offer you a $50K bribe?” (Video: Paul Rieckhoff🇺🇸🇺🇦)

Marco Foster

102,284 次观看 • 5 个月前

How does this officer have a badge? Her Karen energy is strong as she is far more concerned with feelings over rights and laws. Imagine being so offended by a camera that you try and "cancel" the First Amendment. In this clip, we see Officer L. Sullivan (#1408) and Sgt. S. Heustis responding to a "harassment" call at Carolina Couture. The "harassment" in question? Standing on a public sidewalk and recording. 1st amendment protected act. Sullivan’s approach is the definition of "Karen Cop" behavior. Instead of shutting down the nonsense, she validates the boutique owner's delusion that she can control what happens outside her storefront on it public sidewalk. The back-and-forth about identification and "policy" vs. "law" is exactly why these audits are necessary. Watch as the officers try to navigate the gap between what the boutique owner wants (a private sidewalk) and what the Constitution actually allows. Spoiler alert: The sidewalk is still public, and the "Karen" energy is still through the roof at the Scottsdale PD. The real scary part is that if it were up to any of these officers they would have not hesitated violating the rights of these gentlemen just to satisfy the store owner if they could get away with it. They all failed at their oath to protect the constitutional rights of the citizens.

How does this officer have a badge? Her Karen energy is strong as she is far more concerned with feelings over rights and laws. Imagine being so offended by a camera that you try and "cancel" the First Amendment. In this clip, we see Officer L. Sullivan (#1408) and Sgt. S. Heustis responding to a "harassment" call at Carolina Couture. The "harassment" in question? Standing on a public sidewalk and recording. 1st amendment protected act. Sullivan’s approach is the definition of "Karen Cop" behavior. Instead of shutting down the nonsense, she validates the boutique owner's delusion that she can control what happens outside her storefront on it public sidewalk. The back-and-forth about identification and "policy" vs. "law" is exactly why these audits are necessary. Watch as the officers try to navigate the gap between what the boutique owner wants (a private sidewalk) and what the Constitution actually allows. Spoiler alert: The sidewalk is still public, and the "Karen" energy is still through the roof at the Scottsdale PD. The real scary part is that if it were up to any of these officers they would have not hesitated violating the rights of these gentlemen just to satisfy the store owner if they could get away with it. They all failed at their oath to protect the constitutional rights of the citizens.

Giggling Ganon

56,076 次观看 • 2 个月前

A sensitive cop loses his temper when he gets the finger and decides to break the law and violate a man's rights. Until cops are held accountable for this behavior it will never stop. 2 more rotten apples.

A sensitive cop loses his temper when he gets the finger and decides to break the law and violate a man's rights. Until cops are held accountable for this behavior it will never stop. 2 more rotten apples.

🥀_ Imposter_🥀

683,697 次观看 • 3 年前

It’s almost comical at this point. The 10th bill this year that has pretty much attempted to take away your first amendment rights and make criticism of Israel legal. These parasites are relentless. This is exactly what happens when a president staffs his entire administration with dual citizen Israelis, and then he supports them rigging our elections.

It’s almost comical at this point. The 10th bill this year that has pretty much attempted to take away your first amendment rights and make criticism of Israel legal. These parasites are relentless. This is exactly what happens when a president staffs his entire administration with dual citizen Israelis, and then he supports them rigging our elections.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

55,927 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,231,346 次观看 • 6 个月前

California Assemblymen David Tangipa EXPOSES Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are making them vote on redistricting WITHOUT SEEING IT “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment — This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong” “They just changed the law that we are supposed to vote on for the election 10 minutes ago. They are asking all of us here in the legislative body to vote on that and we haven't even seen the language that they changed. “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment. It is a new law now. They have changed it entirely, and now they are forcing it on us and on the floor. People need to see this. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. 40 million Californians deserve more than 10 minutes of deliberation, especially when your elected leaders haven't even seen it. Please share. Tell everybody. What is going on in Sacramento is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine.”

California Assemblymen David Tangipa EXPOSES Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are making them vote on redistricting WITHOUT SEEING IT “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment — This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong” “They just changed the law that we are supposed to vote on for the election 10 minutes ago. They are asking all of us here in the legislative body to vote on that and we haven't even seen the language that they changed. “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment. It is a new law now. They have changed it entirely, and now they are forcing it on us and on the floor. People need to see this. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. 40 million Californians deserve more than 10 minutes of deliberation, especially when your elected leaders haven't even seen it. Please share. Tell everybody. What is going on in Sacramento is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine.”

Wall Street Apes

137,114 次观看 • 11 个月前

Let’s be clear, ICE doesn’t care if the people they pick up are criminals, undocumented, citizens, or kids - so long as they are Latino. Let’s also be clear, MAGA enjoys the harm inflicted on these families, they don’t care if they are criminals, undocumented, citizens or kids - so long as they are Latino. Neither ICE nor MAGA care about the constitution unless it directly serves them or inflict pain on others. We asked PAXIS what the constitution says: If federal agents were sweeping families off the street because of the color of their skin, that would not be “enforcement.” It would be a direct collision with the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment does not allow dragnet seizures. The Fifth Amendment does not permit racial targeting by the federal government. Immigration authority does not erase equal protection. A street roundup based on skin color would be the kind of government power the Constitution was written to restrain. Race is not probable cause. Skin color is not suspicion. And no badge overrides the Bill of Rights. Find out more about

Let’s be clear, ICE doesn’t care if the people they pick up are criminals, undocumented, citizens, or kids - so long as they are Latino. Let’s also be clear, MAGA enjoys the harm inflicted on these families, they don’t care if they are criminals, undocumented, citizens or kids - so long as they are Latino. Neither ICE nor MAGA care about the constitution unless it directly serves them or inflict pain on others. We asked PAXIS what the constitution says: If federal agents were sweeping families off the street because of the color of their skin, that would not be “enforcement.” It would be a direct collision with the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment does not allow dragnet seizures. The Fifth Amendment does not permit racial targeting by the federal government. Immigration authority does not erase equal protection. A street roundup based on skin color would be the kind of government power the Constitution was written to restrain. Race is not probable cause. Skin color is not suspicion. And no badge overrides the Bill of Rights. Find out more about

Joe Walsh

40,782 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: The United Nations reminded the US that attacks on civilian targets in Iran are contrary to international law. Does the US listen to law and human rights?

🚨 BREAKING: The United Nations reminded the US that attacks on civilian targets in Iran are contrary to international law. Does the US listen to law and human rights?

GBC

55,076 次观看 • 6 天前

This should make every American livid! 😤 Since when is the American Flag 🇺🇸 offensive in our own country?! Listen to this mom … she needs to sue that school! They are violating her 1st Amendment rights! It’s ridiculous! 🙄

This should make every American livid! 😤 Since when is the American Flag 🇺🇸 offensive in our own country?! Listen to this mom … she needs to sue that school! They are violating her 1st Amendment rights! It’s ridiculous! 🙄

PammsyNow

47,684 次观看 • 1 天前

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin claims the officer who killed Renee Good "followed his training. He was in fear for his life. He was in fear for the law enforcement officers around his lives. And that's when he followed his training and this situation turned deadly."

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin claims the officer who killed Renee Good "followed his training. He was in fear for his life. He was in fear for the law enforcement officers around his lives. And that's when he followed his training and this situation turned deadly."

Aaron Rupar

169,044 次观看 • 6 个月前

Minnesota State Patrol directly violated the Fourth Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution Article 1 Section 10. He directed his dog to jump in the window. It didn't do it the first round, so he brought him back and started over, and you can see his hand gestures. This is the type of trash we have with badges in Minnesota. These people are not there to protect your rights they are there to violate your rights, and this is a fine example.

Minnesota State Patrol directly violated the Fourth Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution Article 1 Section 10. He directed his dog to jump in the window. It didn't do it the first round, so he brought him back and started over, and you can see his hand gestures. This is the type of trash we have with badges in Minnesota. These people are not there to protect your rights they are there to violate your rights, and this is a fine example.

All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿

20,096 次观看 • 2 个月前