Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Using the amazing Boot Loader from CaptainYS (author of the Tsugaru emulator), FM Towns owners can leverage external SCSI CD-ROM drives (or CDDA-capable SCSI ODEs like ArdSCSino Blaster and ZuluSCSI Plus) to enjoy some software, even when their internal CD-ROM drive is dead! As you can see in the... show more

ateam

4,380 subscribers

16,927 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Benedict Evans says AI means more software, not less: "There's going to be a bunch of stuff you could do with software that you just couldn't do before at all. And so there will be more competition." "If you think about the enterprise software fleet today, you've got three buckets... big iron horizontal systems, so SAP and Workday and your CRM... vertical software... and then in the middle, this fuzzy improvised space of Excel and email and the shared file system." "Now you add ChatGPT to that. Do you do that in an LLM? Is there an LLM tool that means you can do that in Salesforce where you couldn't do it before, or you can do it in your vertical app that you couldn't do before?" "All of which is a long way of saying, what does this do to software? And it must be more software. Way more software." Benedict Evans with Erik Torenberg

Benedict Evans says AI means more software, not less: "There's going to be a bunch of stuff you could do with software that you just couldn't do before at all. And so there will be more competition." "If you think about the enterprise software fleet today, you've got three buckets... big iron horizontal systems, so SAP and Workday and your CRM... vertical software... and then in the middle, this fuzzy improvised space of Excel and email and the shared file system." "Now you add ChatGPT to that. Do you do that in an LLM? Is there an LLM tool that means you can do that in Salesforce where you couldn't do it before, or you can do it in your vertical app that you couldn't do before?" "All of which is a long way of saying, what does this do to software? And it must be more software. Way more software." Benedict Evans with Erik Torenberg

a16z

36,975 views • 3 months ago

Replit CEO Amjad Masad: "Code is almost fully automated." "We have an automated software engineer that is as good as a mid-level software engineer. It would get a job at Facebook or Google." "Even professional software engineers are not coding anymore." "If you're a product builder, all you have to care about is who the customer is." "What do you understand about the world that other people don't? And can you put that into an app?" Amjad Masad with

Replit CEO Amjad Masad: "Code is almost fully automated." "We have an automated software engineer that is as good as a mid-level software engineer. It would get a job at Facebook or Google." "Even professional software engineers are not coding anymore." "If you're a product builder, all you have to care about is who the customer is." "What do you understand about the world that other people don't? And can you put that into an app?" Amjad Masad with

a16z

90,480 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

ANI

114,594 views • 2 months ago

There is something about Rom Braslavski's story that hits the deepest corners of my soul. We've heard stories of suffering and of heroism, and we admire so many people for the strength they've shown. But Rom is beyond all that. Possibly because of his apparent weakness, a person that is evidently not the macho hero, the message really drives through. He lived through two years of hell. And when you listen to him you feel the pain in every cell of his body. It's seeing him that you realize what true horror is, and what Hamas and the palestinians stand for. It's impossible to remain untouched. Impossible to avoid that knot in your throat and the tears welling up. You are the ultimate hero, Rom! May you know only peace and love in your life from now onward! ❤️

There is something about Rom Braslavski's story that hits the deepest corners of my soul. We've heard stories of suffering and of heroism, and we admire so many people for the strength they've shown. But Rom is beyond all that. Possibly because of his apparent weakness, a person that is evidently not the macho hero, the message really drives through. He lived through two years of hell. And when you listen to him you feel the pain in every cell of his body. It's seeing him that you realize what true horror is, and what Hamas and the palestinians stand for. It's impossible to remain untouched. Impossible to avoid that knot in your throat and the tears welling up. You are the ultimate hero, Rom! May you know only peace and love in your life from now onward! ❤️

Hamas Atrocities

11,639 views • 9 months ago

We think the mystery of why Ling’s b+3 can’t be parried is solved. It’s not because it’s an ankle or heel attack, and it’s not directly because of a backturn animation. Some moves simply have a “can’t be parried” property. This property is not shown in practice mode; you have to use external tools that read the game’s code to see it. Below are some moves that can’t be parried and some that look similar but can be parried. Note that most running moves can’t be parried. Thanks to BanaNeko for this information.

We think the mystery of why Ling’s b+3 can’t be parried is solved. It’s not because it’s an ankle or heel attack, and it’s not directly because of a backturn animation. Some moves simply have a “can’t be parried” property. This property is not shown in practice mode; you have to use external tools that read the game’s code to see it. Below are some moves that can’t be parried and some that look similar but can be parried. Note that most running moves can’t be parried. Thanks to BanaNeko for this information.

TekkenDocs

57,936 views • 1 month ago

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

798,729 views • 3 months ago

We asked James Wang why Cerebras can run large models so quickly. His answer: Inference speed is mostly a memory problem. Instead of constantly pulling weights from external memory, Cerebras splits the model across multiple wafers and pipelines the layers together. “Inference is all about memory bandwidth.” “You don’t want to store weights external to the wafer, because the second it’s outside, it becomes much slower.” “We put the weights on the inside.” “The team built a new software stack that basically lets us split the models by layer and store them layer by layer across multiple wafers.” “That allows us to never have to read from external memory, and that’s what makes it so fast.” “For context, Claude is about 100 tokens per second.”

We asked James Wang why Cerebras can run large models so quickly. His answer: Inference speed is mostly a memory problem. Instead of constantly pulling weights from external memory, Cerebras splits the model across multiple wafers and pipelines the layers together. “Inference is all about memory bandwidth.” “You don’t want to store weights external to the wafer, because the second it’s outside, it becomes much slower.” “We put the weights on the inside.” “The team built a new software stack that basically lets us split the models by layer and store them layer by layer across multiple wafers.” “That allows us to never have to read from external memory, and that’s what makes it so fast.” “For context, Claude is about 100 tokens per second.”

MTS

27,935 views • 3 months ago

It is has not ceased to be weird that I can put Rilke’s First Elegy into Suno and get out a coherent 8 minute performance with music. You might not like the interpretation, but it is genuinely amazing that this audio, with apparent emotion, is all 100% AI from the verses alone.

It is has not ceased to be weird that I can put Rilke’s First Elegy into Suno and get out a coherent 8 minute performance with music. You might not like the interpretation, but it is genuinely amazing that this audio, with apparent emotion, is all 100% AI from the verses alone.

Ethan Mollick

43,045 views • 1 year ago

Factory is better than Devin, Codex, and Jules, and it's not even close. This is not just a fully autonomous software engineer but also a product manager and researcher. It's the entire package you need to build a new project or dramatically expand an existing one. I recorded a quick video so you can see how it works. You can use these autonomous Droids from Factory. Here is what they can do: 1. Build a full production-grade app from scratch 2. Develop new features for an existing codebase 3. Migrations or refactors on your codebase 4. Build integrations 5. Generate complete feature specifications 6. Solve and close issues from your issue management system 7. Do deep research on any software topics And Factory can connect to Linear, GitHub, Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Sentry, GitLab, and Notion to do its work. You can use any of the big models to do what you need.

Factory is better than Devin, Codex, and Jules, and it's not even close. This is not just a fully autonomous software engineer but also a product manager and researcher. It's the entire package you need to build a new project or dramatically expand an existing one. I recorded a quick video so you can see how it works. You can use these autonomous Droids from Factory. Here is what they can do: 1. Build a full production-grade app from scratch 2. Develop new features for an existing codebase 3. Migrations or refactors on your codebase 4. Build integrations 5. Generate complete feature specifications 6. Solve and close issues from your issue management system 7. Do deep research on any software topics And Factory can connect to Linear, GitHub, Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Sentry, GitLab, and Notion to do its work. You can use any of the big models to do what you need.

Santiago

70,099 views • 1 year ago

✨ The cool thing about this year's Vibe Jam is that most games now have an actually working ⭕️ Vibeverse portals where you can walk, run, swim, drive or sail from one game straight into the other one The more player your game sends to the portal to other games, the more players you receive back! Kinda like a link exchange but for games 😊 You can enter the portal with any of the 945 games submitted here:

✨ The cool thing about this year's Vibe Jam is that most games now have an actually working ⭕️ Vibeverse portals where you can walk, run, swim, drive or sail from one game straight into the other one The more player your game sends to the portal to other games, the more players you receive back! Kinda like a link exchange but for games 😊 You can enter the portal with any of the 945 games submitted here:

@levelsio

26,379 views • 4 months ago

The new bar for software: "can I vibecode this?" We’re heading into a world of personal software — built for one person and their needs — and premium software, designed with such depth that you’re buying a solution, not a tool. Most software today sits in the middle. And the middle is death. As the market catches up to our new reality, it won’t just be the ai bubble popping — it’ll be a lot of traditional SaaS getting wiped out (From my recent Kinference talk.)

The new bar for software: "can I vibecode this?" We’re heading into a world of personal software — built for one person and their needs — and premium software, designed with such depth that you’re buying a solution, not a tool. Most software today sits in the middle. And the middle is death. As the market catches up to our new reality, it won’t just be the ai bubble popping — it’ll be a lot of traditional SaaS getting wiped out (From my recent Kinference talk.)

Carl Rivera

98,706 views • 10 months ago

Is Traditional Software Engineering Dead? “Does this mean that traditional software engineering is dead? Absolutely not. Software engineers—even the ones who are not necessarily tuning or training AI models—these are now among the most leveraged people on earth. Sure, the guys who are training and tuning models are even more leveraged because they’re building the tool set that software engineers are using. But software engineers still have two massive advantages on you. First, they think in code, so they actually know what’s going on underneath. And all abstractions are leaky. So when you have a computer programming for you—when you have Claude Code or equivalent programming for you—it’s going to make mistakes. It’s going to have bugs. It’s going to have suboptimal architecture. So it’s not going to be quite right. And someone who understands what’s going on underneath will be able to plug the leaks as they occur. So if you want to build a well-architected application, if you want to be able to even specify a well-architected application, if you want to be able to make it run at high performance, if you want it to do its best, if you want to catch the bugs early, then you’re going to want to have a software engineering background. The traditional software engineer is going to be able to use these tools much better. And there are still many kinds of problems in software engineering that are out of scope for these AI programs today. The easiest way to think about those is problems that are outside of their data distribution. For example, if they need to do a binary sort or reverse a linked list, they’ve seen countless examples of that, so they’re extremely good at it. But when you start getting out of their domain—where you have to write very high-performance code, when you’re running on architectures that are novel or brand new, when you’re actually creating new things or solving new problems, then you still need to get in there and hand code it. At least until either there are so many of those examples that new models can be trained on them, or until these models can sufficiently reason at even higher levels of abstraction and crack it on their own… And remember: there is no demand for average. The average app—nobody wants it, at least as long as it’s not filling some niche that is filled by a superior app. The app that is better will win essentially a hundred percent of the market. Maybe there’s some small percentage that will bleed off to the second-best app because it does some little niche feature better than the main app, or it’s cheaper, or something of the sort. But generally speaking, people only want the best of anything. So the bad news is there’s no point in being number two or number three—like in the famous Glengarry Glen Ross scene where Alec Baldwin says, “First place gets a Cadillac Eldorado, second place gets a set of steak knives, and third place you’re fired.” That’s absolutely true in these winner-take-all markets. That’s the bad news: You have to be the best at something if you want to win. However, the set of things you can be best at is infinite. You can always find some niche that is perfect for you, and you can be the best at that thing. This goes back to an old tweet of mine where I said, “Become the best in the world at what you do. Keep redefining what you do until this is true.” And I think that still applies in this age of AI.”

Naval

860,950 views • 6 months ago

Garry Tan, President and CEO of Y Combinator, on what agentic software teams can do today: "you can go from zero to 15 mil ARR in about four months with like two or three people and like hundreds of agents, like, you know, a few hundred skill files." "building these agentic systems today I think that all you doing is you seeing where the bottlenecks are" "how do I just instruct the agent to create a piece of software or a markdown file that blows away that roadblock?"

Garry Tan, President and CEO of Y Combinator, on what agentic software teams can do today: "you can go from zero to 15 mil ARR in about four months with like two or three people and like hundreds of agents, like, you know, a few hundred skill files." "building these agentic systems today I think that all you doing is you seeing where the bottlenecks are" "how do I just instruct the agent to create a piece of software or a markdown file that blows away that roadblock?"

Guillermo Flor

109,335 views • 28 days ago

I know it's easy to discard gaming from the 80s, 90s, and even the early 2000s as nothing more than nostalgia viewed through rose-tinted glasses. One aspect that often gets overlooked in that debate is actually based on facts, not just overly sentimental nostalgia. Having a computer and wanting to get the most out of it - and sometimes even just to get it working at all - required you to be far more invested, curious, and hands-on, so maybe that's why anyone who experienced that era feels a stronger connection to it. You had to read up on things, learn, and tinker with both software and hardware. If you had a PC in the 80s or 90s, it wasn't a "one and done" purchase. There was constant upgrading: swapping out a crappy sound card for a better one, replacing a small/slow hard drive, installing a CD-ROM drive, doubling your RAM from 1 MB to 2 MB… the list went on and on. It meant installing and updating drivers so everything actually worked. It meant understanding compatibility issues - all without the internet in the early days - so you relied on magazines, manuals, and friends who had "been there, done that." And that was just the hardware side. Then came the software: getting drivers, configs, and setups tuned perfectly so you could squeeze every last bit of performance out of the machine. Some games simply wouldn't run unless you freed up those final kilobytes of conventional memory. There was even a whole industry built around "managing your PC" with tools like Norton Commander and countless others. These days, there is... No more fiddling with AUTOEXEC.BAT or CONFIG.SYS files. No fine-tuning HIMEM.SYS. No IRQ conflicts with your sound card. No more boot disks. Juggling hard drive space? Forget it - drives now come in terabytes, not megabytes. Dealing with a 5.25" floppy, a 3.5" floppy, and a CD-ROM drive all crammed into one case? What a drag. Saving up for that shiny new VGA card to replace your old EGA? Not a thing anymore. And yet, if you ask older gamers who lived through the 80s and 90s, most of us actually enjoyed customizing and troubleshooting our machines. It was part of the experience - part of the joy and excitement. Sure, it involved plenty of trial and error and frustrating "OMFG, why isn't this working?!" moments… but when it finally worked, the reward was so much sweeter. Finally freeing up those last couple of kilobytes of your 640K base memory? Glorious. Replacing that pathetic PC speaker with a real sound card? Pure ecstasy. To all you old-school gamers out there, I hope you experienced it the same way. I always felt that the need to tinker endlessly made the whole experience more rewarding. You were more connected to your machine and understood it on a deeper level. These days, you just click a button and the game downloads and installs itself. I have a modern PC, of course. It's been over 20 years since I last had to do any real tinkering. That's convenient, sure… but the magic and curiosity is gone.

I know it's easy to discard gaming from the 80s, 90s, and even the early 2000s as nothing more than nostalgia viewed through rose-tinted glasses. One aspect that often gets overlooked in that debate is actually based on facts, not just overly sentimental nostalgia. Having a computer and wanting to get the most out of it - and sometimes even just to get it working at all - required you to be far more invested, curious, and hands-on, so maybe that's why anyone who experienced that era feels a stronger connection to it. You had to read up on things, learn, and tinker with both software and hardware. If you had a PC in the 80s or 90s, it wasn't a "one and done" purchase. There was constant upgrading: swapping out a crappy sound card for a better one, replacing a small/slow hard drive, installing a CD-ROM drive, doubling your RAM from 1 MB to 2 MB… the list went on and on. It meant installing and updating drivers so everything actually worked. It meant understanding compatibility issues - all without the internet in the early days - so you relied on magazines, manuals, and friends who had "been there, done that." And that was just the hardware side. Then came the software: getting drivers, configs, and setups tuned perfectly so you could squeeze every last bit of performance out of the machine. Some games simply wouldn't run unless you freed up those final kilobytes of conventional memory. There was even a whole industry built around "managing your PC" with tools like Norton Commander and countless others. These days, there is... No more fiddling with AUTOEXEC.BAT or CONFIG.SYS files. No fine-tuning HIMEM.SYS. No IRQ conflicts with your sound card. No more boot disks. Juggling hard drive space? Forget it - drives now come in terabytes, not megabytes. Dealing with a 5.25" floppy, a 3.5" floppy, and a CD-ROM drive all crammed into one case? What a drag. Saving up for that shiny new VGA card to replace your old EGA? Not a thing anymore. And yet, if you ask older gamers who lived through the 80s and 90s, most of us actually enjoyed customizing and troubleshooting our machines. It was part of the experience - part of the joy and excitement. Sure, it involved plenty of trial and error and frustrating "OMFG, why isn't this working?!" moments… but when it finally worked, the reward was so much sweeter. Finally freeing up those last couple of kilobytes of your 640K base memory? Glorious. Replacing that pathetic PC speaker with a real sound card? Pure ecstasy. To all you old-school gamers out there, I hope you experienced it the same way. I always felt that the need to tinker endlessly made the whole experience more rewarding. You were more connected to your machine and understood it on a deeper level. These days, you just click a button and the game downloads and installs itself. I have a modern PC, of course. It's been over 20 years since I last had to do any real tinkering. That's convenient, sure… but the magic and curiosity is gone.

exQUIZitely 🕹️

34,686 views • 4 months ago

Introducing Clips - 100% free, open source, agent-native alternative to Loom Unlike Loom, agent's can fully understand Clips just from a URL. Every Clip comes with APIs and metadata for agents to explore their contents. Agents can "see and hear" anything in a Clip - not just transcripts, but everything visually in the video at any timestamp. Easily share bug reports, feedback, analyses, or anything else in a way that you can easily pass to agents to use to improve products, reports, or more. Also unlike Loom, you own the software, so no one can jack up prices on you suddenly like Loom did to us. Clips is made to be customized. The built-in agent can customize its own code, so you can personalize the app to your needs and workflows. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Open-source, forkable, customizable with agents, to make your own personal version of anything. You can also import Looms just from a URL and upload videos as well. I got so sick of telling people "don't send me feedback as looms, I can't pass those to agents, I need text and images" that I had to just solve this once and for all. There's a free hosted version you can use too, or fork and self host yourself. Will link to both in the replies.

Introducing Clips - 100% free, open source, agent-native alternative to Loom Unlike Loom, agent's can fully understand Clips just from a URL. Every Clip comes with APIs and metadata for agents to explore their contents. Agents can "see and hear" anything in a Clip - not just transcripts, but everything visually in the video at any timestamp. Easily share bug reports, feedback, analyses, or anything else in a way that you can easily pass to agents to use to improve products, reports, or more. Also unlike Loom, you own the software, so no one can jack up prices on you suddenly like Loom did to us. Clips is made to be customized. The built-in agent can customize its own code, so you can personalize the app to your needs and workflows. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Open-source, forkable, customizable with agents, to make your own personal version of anything. You can also import Looms just from a URL and upload videos as well. I got so sick of telling people "don't send me feedback as looms, I can't pass those to agents, I need text and images" that I had to just solve this once and for all. There's a free hosted version you can use too, or fork and self host yourself. Will link to both in the replies.

Steve (Builder.io)

232,641 views • 2 months ago

"In the future, you won't need any software at all. The neural network will completely replace it." - stephen balaban, co-founder of Lambda "Here's the idea: instead of generating a program, just go to ChatGPT and say, 'Hi, please behave like a calculator or a spreadsheet.'" "'Generate an ASCII user interface for me. And I want you to essentially just respond, implement the logic of that program in your mind.'" "This is what I call neural software. Normal software is really brittle. 'Neural software' can't have bugs, only misunderstandings." "Large language models will be the software you interact with." From Stephen's appearance on the show in May.

"In the future, you won't need any software at all. The neural network will completely replace it." - stephen balaban, co-founder of Lambda "Here's the idea: instead of generating a program, just go to ChatGPT and say, 'Hi, please behave like a calculator or a spreadsheet.'" "'Generate an ASCII user interface for me. And I want you to essentially just respond, implement the logic of that program in your mind.'" "This is what I call neural software. Normal software is really brittle. 'Neural software' can't have bugs, only misunderstandings." "Large language models will be the software you interact with." From Stephen's appearance on the show in May.

TBPN

28,665 views • 10 months ago

👀 My Coaching Eye is excellent 👀 💡Through my system PSR, you can train yours to be too💡 We can all look at the same run and yet SEE different things.🧐 We can all listen to the same foot contacts and yet HEAR different things🙉. Why is that, and how do we create a common language? 📝I have done a deep down the rabbit hole of sprint biomechanics , snow balling through the research and coming out the other end with a simple model that demystifies the complex📝 ✅My System is PSR✅. You can now log into vuemotion to purchase a PSR report, directly from there software. What other models for sprint analysis have you found helpful?

👀 My Coaching Eye is excellent 👀 💡Through my system PSR, you can train yours to be too💡 We can all look at the same run and yet SEE different things.🧐 We can all listen to the same foot contacts and yet HEAR different things🙉. Why is that, and how do we create a common language? 📝I have done a deep down the rabbit hole of sprint biomechanics , snow balling through the research and coming out the other end with a simple model that demystifies the complex📝 ✅My System is PSR✅. You can now log into vuemotion to purchase a PSR report, directly from there software. What other models for sprint analysis have you found helpful?

Jonas Dodoo

12,784 views • 2 years ago

A father-son duo started a CD-Rom game in 2000 making Roman military strategy games. In 2013, they created Command: Modern Operation, a wargame simulator with battles from WWII to present day. The maps, databases and war scenarios were so good that US Air Force, the Pentagon and Britain’s strategic command reached out. Per WSJ, Gamemaker Slitherine Software has since created a special version of Command that the is blocked off from consumer market and can handle classified data. Wargaming goes back to the Prussian Army in the 1800s. Prior to Command, the government would use tabletop maps and dice games (very souped up versions of Risk and Stratego). The arrangement with Command work because Slitherine gets so much feedback from its 1m+ consumer users and improves the product faster than an internal wargaming tool can. *** Full read here: Game trailer:

A father-son duo started a CD-Rom game in 2000 making Roman military strategy games. In 2013, they created Command: Modern Operation, a wargame simulator with battles from WWII to present day. The maps, databases and war scenarios were so good that US Air Force, the Pentagon and Britain’s strategic command reached out. Per WSJ, Gamemaker Slitherine Software has since created a special version of Command that the is blocked off from consumer market and can handle classified data. Wargaming goes back to the Prussian Army in the 1800s. Prior to Command, the government would use tabletop maps and dice games (very souped up versions of Risk and Stratego). The arrangement with Command work because Slitherine gets so much feedback from its 1m+ consumer users and improves the product faster than an internal wargaming tool can. *** Full read here: Game trailer:

Trung Phan

265,569 views • 1 year ago