Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney...

476,977 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Lana Del Turtle's profile picture
Lana Del Turtle2 years ago

At this point, it probably doesn't matter if Proctor likes or doesn't like Yannetti, thinks Karen Read is a c-word or doesn't. The mere fact he wrote it, in jest or not, is enough to demonstrate incurable, irredeemable bias operating systemically throughout the investigation. No words from any witness will ever change jurors' impression of what they just heard.

Margie Loo's profile picture
Margie Loo2 years ago

Proctor is gonna be looking to employ Yanetti once Karen Read found not guilty.

Cat Ryan's profile picture
Cat Ryan2 years ago

Proctor should be fired! He tampered with evidence Tried to influence the ME Made fun of the suspect and discussed her medical issues!

Mildred Hornblower's profile picture
Mildred Hornblower2 years ago

Welp! After his text messages about pressuring the ME to rule it a homicide, EVERY homicide conviction he gained must be re-examined and verdicts overturned. Both the CW police and Canton PD need to be reformed too to bottom.

Boston Mike's profile picture
Boston Mike2 years ago

I got you- TOUHY

Magnolia_Gypsy's profile picture
Magnolia_Gypsy2 years ago

Worse! His Supervisors knew and liked that trash he was texting to them! The whole unit is compromised!

BKay's profile picture
BKay2 years ago

Pretty sure most people "don't care for" Proctor now. But most of us think @BostonDefender is the bomb!!

Goatboy's profile picture
Goatboy2 years ago

That! Will be revisited. His own words will crush him.

Secret Squirrel 🕶 🇺🇸's profile picture
Secret Squirrel 🕶 🇺🇸2 years ago

I see why others pitched their phones when they had the chance.

HaleyWolf's profile picture
HaleyWolf2 years ago

yanetti is probably thinking 'thank you very much, I hate you too" lol

Related Videos

Michael Proctor attorney Daniel Moynihan’s opening statement, only reinforced my belief that Michael Proctor should’ve never been terminated, and Michael Proctor deserves his job back. Michael Proctor is another casualty of the despicable, unethical, and potential criminal behavior of Karen Read, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, and the blogger known as Turtleboy. 📌 why did David Yannetti, and Bill Read, have a secret meeting with US attorney Josh Levey in 2022, that resulted in a grand jury investigating this case? 📌 why were the Feds given access to all these witnesses private conversations on their private cell phones, and why were these conversations given to the defense, when nothing in these conversations were found to be criminal, or show any evidence of a cover-up, or a conspiracy. 📌 how, why, and who leaked these conversations INTENTIONALLY to a blogger who then released them to the public? Hopefully Jessica Leslie will give us those answers. 📌 these leaks of Michael Proctor‘s cell phone, not only lead to his wrongful termination, but began a witch hunt of Michael Proctor, and his entire family. A witch hunt that includes going to his home,doxxing his wife, sending threats to his family, and their private lives turned upside down. The absolute terrorization of Michael Proctor and his family is(as it is still going on) horrific and started at the direction of Karen Read herself. #justiceforproctor #Michaelproctor #givehimbackhisjob

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

21,419 views • 10 months ago

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 views • 4 months ago

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,072 views • 2 years ago

Michael Proctor truly believed that his "gotcha" moment was when he destroyed his old cell phone, replaced that phone and set it to auto-delete after 30 days. Unbeknownst to him, his phone extraction, which was ordered in August of 2025, was successful back to the year of 2013. Trooper Proctor thought that he was safe. That his communications regarding topics like Karen Read, the John O'Keefe murder investigation, his job suspension and firing, and other important cases in the county were auto-deleted from his phone. He was so confident that he did several national interviews proclaiming his innocence. That calling Read vulgar names was a joke.. a figure of speech. He never thought that his phone extraction would pull over a decades worth of data which might show his communications regarding the John O'Keefe murder was not a one-off situation but rather a pattern. A pattern of behavior where he, and most likely his cops buddies, mock defendants and/or victims. Where it was normalized to share private details with those that shouldn't know critical and intimate parts of the cases he worked on. There has been a rumor swirling for some time that photographs were potentially being passed around by Norfolk County state police officers when data extractions were completed on the devices of female defendants/victims. It's been speculated that it was the norm to specifically look for images of women. That they made the rounds of the various group chats. Was this true and did it affect the cases of Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, or Ana Walshe? But no.. no.. according to Proctor, the Read extractions were a lapse in judgement. A one time occurrence.

BoozeyBeauty

67,936 views • 9 months ago

President Trump goes BESERK on Senator Mitch McConnell. He cut him right down to the bone and reduced his entire 40+ year career to nothing within seconds. TRUMP: “Well, McConnell’s an angry man.” “You know, he got thrown out of his position.” “He’s an angry guy.” “You know, he should be very thankful to me because if I didn’t win, he wouldn’t have gotten appoint...I appointed the judges. He didn’t.” “He gets credit for appointing judges. He didn’t appoint anybody, I did.” “You know how I did? I won the election and then I picked judges, and the judges ended up getting approved and they said, oh, didn’t he do a good job?” “He didn’t do a good job. What the HELL did he do?!” “I won the election. He’s an angry man who’s very disloyal to John Thune.” “John Thune is a good man.” “He was a loyal worker for Mitch McConnell. He worked for Mitch McConnell. He worked very hard. He was very loyal to him.” “I disagreed with him a lot because Mitch McConnell gave so much money to Democrats.” “He gave them money. I had to go get the wall money from the military. I just took it out of the military because that guy wouldn’t do anything.” “No, Mitch McConnell’s a bad guy.” “And he’s...I thought he was lousy at his job, lousy at his job.” “But the only thing they give him a lot of credit for judges.” “But I’m the one that got the judges. You know why? I won the election!” “If I didn’t win the election, he wouldn’t have had any judges.”

Overton

213,619 views • 1 month ago