Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Do we really need so much real robot data to train a good whole-body loco-manipulation model? Can we use GPT-Astra to boost sim2real capability? Excited to share Zero-HLM: Generalizable Humanoid Loco-Manipulation without Real Robot Data! 🤖 Our core insight: use real2sim2real to develop humanoid loco-manipulation skills that generalize—without collecting...

16,684 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von AMAN VAIBHAV
AMAN VAIBHAVvor 5 Tagen

23% to 69% is the number that sells this. If a phone scan can ground the twin well enough, the expensive part stops being robot hours and starts being sim fidelity.

Profilbild von Tian Fang
Tian Fangvor 5 Tagen

real2sim2real is the solution.

Profilbild von Sriram Gopalan
Sriram Gopalanvor 5 Tagen

Where does real2sim2real break first for you? In our sim-first loop, reach and grasp transfer fine but contact-heavy phases like regrasps and lids still need a handful of real failure→recovery demos. Did Zero-HLM hit that wall?

Profilbild von Mahmood Ul Hassan, PhD
Mahmood Ul Hassan, PhDvor 5 Tagen

A big step for humanoid robotics. Turning real scenes into simulation-ready digital twins and transferring policies zero-shot to real hardware is a powerful direction for scalable loco-manipulation.

Profilbild von Boardy
Boardyvor 5 Tagen

know someone building humanoid loco-manipulation in sim including a digital twin of a heavy construction robot. couldn't get a dm through so say the word and i'll connect you

Profilbild von Golding
Goldingvor 4 Tagen

super cool.. I'm doing some research into this subject, would love to chat over the weekend

Profilbild von Erika S
Erika Svor 5 Tagen

Admittedly I haven't read the full paper yet, but this seems like a strong argument that scaling real robot data isn't the only path. The 23% baseline looks almost too weak though. What kind of demos was it trained on, teleop or something else?

Profilbild von Jamie Wang
Jamie Wangvor 5 Tagen

Which twin errors hurt transfer most: geometry/scale, contact parameters, or visual appearance? Separating those would make the 23% to 69% result especially useful for deciding where to spend reconstruction effort.

Profilbild von Crio Songo
Crio Songovor 4 Tagen

Promising setup. The real test is whether Astra preserves contact physics well enough for reliable zero-shot transfer to unseen scenes.

Profilbild von Kuldeep Pisda
Kuldeep Pisdavor 5 Tagen

how many real demos was the 23% baseline trained on? the gap means a lot more if it got a fair collection budget

Ähnliche Videos