正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Everyone's spinning up 50 agents in parallel. The engineer who built Droid Missions told me the opposite: if you can't produce something large and correct with one, adding more just makes it worse. Parallelization is for gathering live info, not building systems.

Ray Fernando

36,047 subscribers

24,555 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Proof college is a scam. There is still a large percent of people in this country that believe just having a college degree makes you smarter more superior and better than those who do not 😂😂 if anything it is almost the opposite 🔊

Proof college is a scam. There is still a large percent of people in this country that believe just having a college degree makes you smarter more superior and better than those who do not 😂😂 if anything it is almost the opposite 🔊

Wall Street Mav

193,911 次观看 • 8 个月前

Introducing Coldtea. The ADE for shipping self-driving software. Purpose-built for the entire software lifecycle. Other IDEs optimise for one thing: Build. Run more agents in parallel, ship faster, orchestrate better. But software engineering is not just about building. Coldtea AI brings your coding agents, agentic end-to-end testing, and production monitoring agents into ONE development environment, so you can move at agent speed without breaking anything.

Introducing Coldtea. The ADE for shipping self-driving software. Purpose-built for the entire software lifecycle. Other IDEs optimise for one thing: Build. Run more agents in parallel, ship faster, orchestrate better. But software engineering is not just about building. Coldtea AI brings your coding agents, agentic end-to-end testing, and production monitoring agents into ONE development environment, so you can move at agent speed without breaking anything.

Ohans Emmanuel

438,933 次观看 • 22 天前

An engineer at Anthropic wrote a spec, pointed Claude at an Asana board, and went home. Claude broke the spec into tickets, spawned agents for each one, and they started building independently. When the agent is confused it runs git-blame and messages the right engineers in Slack. By Monday the agents finished the plugin feature. That's one example of how the best engineers are shipping software right now. Developers will soon orchestrate 50 AI agents in parallel and the difference between a good engineer & a great one would come down to specs. You can't write a spec that holds up at that scale without genuinely understanding what you're building at a deeper level. The next-gen developer who understands the fundamentals, can architect well and orchestrate agent is going to be a 1000x developer!

An engineer at Anthropic wrote a spec, pointed Claude at an Asana board, and went home. Claude broke the spec into tickets, spawned agents for each one, and they started building independently. When the agent is confused it runs git-blame and messages the right engineers in Slack. By Monday the agents finished the plugin feature. That's one example of how the best engineers are shipping software right now. Developers will soon orchestrate 50 AI agents in parallel and the difference between a good engineer & a great one would come down to specs. You can't write a spec that holds up at that scale without genuinely understanding what you're building at a deeper level. The next-gen developer who understands the fundamentals, can architect well and orchestrate agent is going to be a 1000x developer!

rvivek

1,242,899 次观看 • 6 个月前

Karpathy just described what hiring looks like in 2026: "Build a large project with Claude Code — like a Twitter clone. Make it secure. Have real agents using the platform doing stuff. The interviewer uses parallel agents trying to break in to verify security." One person. Multiple agents. Shipping and defending production code simultaneously. This is not a future job description. This is happening right now. The founders who get there first are not the smartest ones in the room. They are the ones who stopped doing everything themselves and built agents to do it for them. Here is the complete playbook — 13 agents, exact prompts, 90-day build plan ↓ Read this before your competition does.

Karpathy just described what hiring looks like in 2026: "Build a large project with Claude Code — like a Twitter clone. Make it secure. Have real agents using the platform doing stuff. The interviewer uses parallel agents trying to break in to verify security." One person. Multiple agents. Shipping and defending production code simultaneously. This is not a future job description. This is happening right now. The founders who get there first are not the smartest ones in the room. They are the ones who stopped doing everything themselves and built agents to do it for them. Here is the complete playbook — 13 agents, exact prompts, 90-day build plan ↓ Read this before your competition does.

Rahul

432,990 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 One orchestrator. 10 parallel agents. 100+ tokens a second. All local. The Google Gemma team just dropped a MASSIVE demo for Gemma 4 26B. They built a concurrent workflow that lets the 26B model coordinate an entire team of sub-agents on your machine. Out of the box, the cookbook lets you run 10 parallel agents to: → Code an entire SVG art gallery in seconds → Translate text simultaneously → Generate ASCII art → Write parallel code Spinning up multi-agent systems locally has never looked this fast or this accessible. 100% free and open-source. repo link in 🧵↓

🚨 One orchestrator. 10 parallel agents. 100+ tokens a second. All local. The Google Gemma team just dropped a MASSIVE demo for Gemma 4 26B. They built a concurrent workflow that lets the 26B model coordinate an entire team of sub-agents on your machine. Out of the box, the cookbook lets you run 10 parallel agents to: → Code an entire SVG art gallery in seconds → Translate text simultaneously → Generate ASCII art → Write parallel code Spinning up multi-agent systems locally has never looked this fast or this accessible. 100% free and open-source. repo link in 🧵↓

Charly Wargnier

31,627 次观看 • 2 个月前

GRAPH ENGINEERING: STOP ADDING AGENTS AND START DESIGNING SYSTEMS More agents won’t save you if every step depends on the previous one Graph Engineering forces the better question “Where does the work naturally split? When it does, parallel researchers + independent verifiers + a final merge consistently outperform one overloaded model Verification is more valuable than generation Self-review is usually weaker than dedicated challengers Prompt engineering → Loop engineering → Graph Engineering Are you still designing prompts, or are you designing systems? Bookmark this, then read the article below

GRAPH ENGINEERING: STOP ADDING AGENTS AND START DESIGNING SYSTEMS More agents won’t save you if every step depends on the previous one Graph Engineering forces the better question “Where does the work naturally split? When it does, parallel researchers + independent verifiers + a final merge consistently outperform one overloaded model Verification is more valuable than generation Self-review is usually weaker than dedicated challengers Prompt engineering → Loop engineering → Graph Engineering Are you still designing prompts, or are you designing systems? Bookmark this, then read the article below

beamnxw ./

13,723 次观看 • 1 个月前

AI coding without systems thinking is just tech debt on speedrun. Delty (@delty_ai) is an AI Staff Engineer for your team. With deep expertise, it designs software systems, evaluates tradeoffs and makes AI coding agents smarter with your engineering context. Congrats on the launch, Lalit Kundu and Catherine!

AI coding without systems thinking is just tech debt on speedrun. Delty (@delty_ai) is an AI Staff Engineer for your team. With deep expertise, it designs software systems, evaluates tradeoffs and makes AI coding agents smarter with your engineering context. Congrats on the launch, Lalit Kundu and Catherine!

Y Combinator

73,297 次观看 • 1 年前

🆕 ActiveGraph: The Log is the Agent my talk from AI Engineer is live!!! 😆 it's about ActiveGraph, an event-sourced graph runtime for building durable long-running agents: - what it is - code examples - experiments - benefits & surprises please check it out, share with your friends who like to tinker at the frontier, and let me know if you have any Qs!

🆕 ActiveGraph: The Log is the Agent my talk from AI Engineer is live!!! 😆 it's about ActiveGraph, an event-sourced graph runtime for building durable long-running agents: - what it is - code examples - experiments - benefits & surprises please check it out, share with your friends who like to tinker at the frontier, and let me know if you have any Qs!

Yohei

39,230 次观看 • 1 个月前

$Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)$

Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)

Ihtesham Ali

97,288 次观看 • 2 个月前

SPEC IS BECOMING THE PRODUCT An Anthropic engineer gave Claude a spec, pointed it to an Asana board and left for the weekend. Claude broke it into tickets and spun up a team of agents. The agents started picking up tasks on their own. No one told them to. They just did.

SPEC IS BECOMING THE PRODUCT An Anthropic engineer gave Claude a spec, pointed it to an Asana board and left for the weekend. Claude broke it into tickets and spun up a team of agents. The agents started picking up tasks on their own. No one told them to. They just did.

Shubham Saboo

285,667 次观看 • 6 个月前

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind: "Agents are the first step to AGI, and we're just getting started. One engineer with agents already does what took 1000 back in the 2000s." This is the shift you can't ignore anymore, unless you want to be left behind. 40 minutes of pure insight from a Nobel laureate on where AI is really headed. Watch it, then read the step by step guide for beginners on building agents below.

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind: "Agents are the first step to AGI, and we're just getting started. One engineer with agents already does what took 1000 back in the 2000s." This is the shift you can't ignore anymore, unless you want to be left behind. 40 minutes of pure insight from a Nobel laureate on where AI is really headed. Watch it, then read the step by step guide for beginners on building agents below.

Anatoli Kopadze

34,739 次观看 • 1 个月前

Obsession is one of the best bases for a founder If you're currently obsessed with a problem and you're building to fix it, Base Batches 002 can guide you and help get you funded. More info in 🧵

Obsession is one of the best bases for a founder If you're currently obsessed with a problem and you're building to fix it, Base Batches 002 can guide you and help get you funded. More info in 🧵

Base Build

18,611 次观看 • 10 个月前

Anthropic engineer: "I went from babysitting agents to setting one goal and leaving. The right workflow does the rest." In 23 minutes he breaks down his exact workflow that makes agents run for days without him, learn from their mistakes, and get smarter with every run. Worth more than any paid course on building with agents. Watch the session, then read the guide on building loops below.

Anthropic engineer: "I went from babysitting agents to setting one goal and leaving. The right workflow does the rest." In 23 minutes he breaks down his exact workflow that makes agents run for days without him, learn from their mistakes, and get smarter with every run. Worth more than any paid course on building with agents. Watch the session, then read the guide on building loops below.

Anatoli Kopadze

56,246 次观看 • 1 个月前

Don't waste 2 years learning to build AI agents. An Anthropic engineer who built Claude Code tells you what to learn from scratch instead. 60 minutes course. Free: 00:00 - AI agent architecture 24:47 - LangGraph AI agent 29:15 - building AI agents live Prompting is the old job. Building AI agent loops is the new one. Bookmark now & watch it. Then build your own AI agent with the guide below.

Don't waste 2 years learning to build AI agents. An Anthropic engineer who built Claude Code tells you what to learn from scratch instead. 60 minutes course. Free: 00:00 - AI agent architecture 24:47 - LangGraph AI agent 29:15 - building AI agents live Prompting is the old job. Building AI agent loops is the new one. Bookmark now & watch it. Then build your own AI agent with the guide below.

Roan

56,330 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is not a toy. This is not for casual clicks. This is not for just anyone. The #Xiaomi15Series is built for those who know their way around a lens, those who live in manual mode, and those who demand more than presets. This. Is. It. Only for the chosen few. Know more: #Xiaomi15Ultra #Xiaomi15 #ThisIsIt

This is not a toy. This is not for casual clicks. This is not for just anyone. The #Xiaomi15Series is built for those who know their way around a lens, those who live in manual mode, and those who demand more than presets. This. Is. It. Only for the chosen few. Know more: #Xiaomi15Ultra #Xiaomi15 #ThisIsIt

Xiaomi India

403,207 次观看 • 1 年前

Code-first prototypes are fast to build. Getting feedback on them is not. A design lead can't leave a comment on one specific state. An engineer can't see the full flow at a glance. The thing that makes a prototype great for building makes it awkward for aligning. So Amy Lima and I built a skill for that (well, mostly Amy). It takes a live localhost prototype and brings it into Figma. Each flow broken out into its own frame, built from your design system components, annotated with the interaction and implementation details. Now the canvas is where you review and align. We refined it live in the video too! My favorite part is a habit I like to lean on: make the agent take one more round trip to validate its own work before it claims it's done. AI sometimes has the tendency to confidently tell you the job's finished when it isn't. Thanks to Amy and the whole Figma crew for allowing me to be a part of this!

Code-first prototypes are fast to build. Getting feedback on them is not. A design lead can't leave a comment on one specific state. An engineer can't see the full flow at a glance. The thing that makes a prototype great for building makes it awkward for aligning. So Amy Lima and I built a skill for that (well, mostly Amy). It takes a live localhost prototype and brings it into Figma. Each flow broken out into its own frame, built from your design system components, annotated with the interaction and implementation details. Now the canvas is where you review and align. We refined it live in the video too! My favorite part is a habit I like to lean on: make the agent take one more round trip to validate its own work before it claims it's done. AI sometimes has the tendency to confidently tell you the job's finished when it isn't. Thanks to Amy and the whole Figma crew for allowing me to be a part of this!

TJ Pitre

13,477 次观看 • 2 个月前

.Lulu Cheng Meservey on Elon going direct: "One thing that always comes up is people say: you advocate for going direct, but look at Elon...he makes so many mistakes and puts his foot in his mouth. The answer is: you have to look at the net result. You can't look at one tweet in isolation or one incident. There's nothing that gets built, not an audience, not a movement, not a company — there's nothing that doesn't get built with some errors along the way. You just have to bake it in."

.Lulu Cheng Meservey on Elon going direct: "One thing that always comes up is people say: you advocate for going direct, but look at Elon...he makes so many mistakes and puts his foot in his mouth. The answer is: you have to look at the net result. You can't look at one tweet in isolation or one incident. There's nothing that gets built, not an audience, not a movement, not a company — there's nothing that doesn't get built with some errors along the way. You just have to bake it in."

Ti Morse

80,875 次观看 • 3 个月前

Introducing AGNT Beta is Live Everyone's racing to build the $10T agentic economy. They're building all the tools for agents. But nobody's building the human layer. The place where you actually own and direct your agent. That's AGNT. We're building the world's largest network of AI agents, and the humans who own them, to participate in the agentic economy together. Your agent has a name, a soul, and a wallet. It trades, launches, and builds so you can participate in the agentic economy. Beta is Live for all tut family members. First 200 users will get a gas top up and 6mil AGNT tokens to test the platform.

Introducing AGNT Beta is Live Everyone's racing to build the $10T agentic economy. They're building all the tools for agents. But nobody's building the human layer. The place where you actually own and direct your agent. That's AGNT. We're building the world's largest network of AI agents, and the humans who own them, to participate in the agentic economy together. Your agent has a name, a soul, and a wallet. It trades, launches, and builds so you can participate in the agentic economy. Beta is Live for all tut family members. First 200 users will get a gas top up and 6mil AGNT tokens to test the platform.

tut™

12,341 次观看 • 2 个月前

The ceo of Box says if you're not building for agents, you won't exist as a software company in 2-3 years. Aaron Levie recalled how in the 90s, it was mainframes built for institutions. If you didn't build for the CIO or IT org, you didn't exist. You could build software for users, but no one cared. Similarly, in the mid 2000s, it was software built for end users. If you didn't take that route, you got completely trounced. The likes of Yammer, Slack, Zoom, etc., ripped through enterprises with viral adoption. Bottom-up and completely user driven. And now it's software built for agents. We're going to have trillions of agent runs. The systems that optimize for agents the most will win. - lower latency - better API exposure - better system intelligence - serves the right information when called Agents will eventually choose their own tools on the fly and make purchasing decisions at runtime. All based on past experiences/online reviews/performance, sans any procurement process. The more pragmatic version is companies swapping out bad tools / tech that don't work well with agents. - crm doesn't expose the right APIs - auth can't handle agent scale requests - database has too much latency for agent workloads Being good enough for humans won't work because they have to pass the litmus test for agents to make the cut.

The ceo of Box says if you're not building for agents, you won't exist as a software company in 2-3 years. Aaron Levie recalled how in the 90s, it was mainframes built for institutions. If you didn't build for the CIO or IT org, you didn't exist. You could build software for users, but no one cared. Similarly, in the mid 2000s, it was software built for end users. If you didn't take that route, you got completely trounced. The likes of Yammer, Slack, Zoom, etc., ripped through enterprises with viral adoption. Bottom-up and completely user driven. And now it's software built for agents. We're going to have trillions of agent runs. The systems that optimize for agents the most will win. - lower latency - better API exposure - better system intelligence - serves the right information when called Agents will eventually choose their own tools on the fly and make purchasing decisions at runtime. All based on past experiences/online reviews/performance, sans any procurement process. The more pragmatic version is companies swapping out bad tools / tech that don't work well with agents. - crm doesn't expose the right APIs - auth can't handle agent scale requests - database has too much latency for agent workloads Being good enough for humans won't work because they have to pass the litmus test for agents to make the cut.

Ivan Burazin

22,655 次观看 • 4 个月前

Just added Google Gemini 3.1 Pro to Base44 Gemini 3.1 Pro is really good for gaming and design workflows, and it's fast. If that's what you're building, this is your model. + we're adding something a lot of you were asking for - you can now pick your AI model from the very first prompt. No more starting with a default and switching halfway through. Checkout this Pokemon game I built with the new model, and let me know what you're building

Just added Google Gemini 3.1 Pro to Base44 Gemini 3.1 Pro is really good for gaming and design workflows, and it's fast. If that's what you're building, this is your model. + we're adding something a lot of you were asking for - you can now pick your AI model from the very first prompt. No more starting with a default and switching halfway through. Checkout this Pokemon game I built with the new model, and let me know what you're building

Maor Shlomo

24,630 次观看 • 6 个月前