Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Let’s talk about DIRTY Yuri… because this isn’t a misunderstanding, this is how they blur responsibility and shield themselves. On the stand, DIRTY Yuri bent over backwards to tell the jury that Michael Proctor wasn’t a “leader.” Not a lead investigator. Not in charge.Just a case officer. A facilitator.A... know… just the guy who Managed the investigation…Wrote search warrants…Coordinated tasks…Directed activity…. But sure — not a leader DIRTY YURI FORGOT LIASSON TO THE HOUSE DEFENDANTS! On July 23, 2024, Det. Lt. Brian Tully sits down for an Internal Affairs interview and says it plainly that Proctor was the lead investigator, Assigned through the on-call system With Dirty Yuri as his supervisor….No hesitation. No word games. But here’s the part Dirty Yuri hoped nobody noticed….Tully didn’t just learn this later. He knew about this months earlier. Tully signed a federal NDA on March 7, 2024 That NDA was tied to federal grand jury material High-ranking MSP command staff were already involved So by the time Yuri takes the stand? This was not new information. This is after Federal involvement, Internal awareness, Command-level knowledge And somehow… the story became “There was no leader.” You don’t accidentally forget your chain of command. You don’t accidentally redefine a role you supervise every single day. And you definitely don’t turn a lead investigator into a “facilitator” unless there’s a reason to blur responsibility. Because if Proctor is the lead investigator Then someone has to answer for how this investigation was handled. But if it’s just a “team effort”? Well… then nobody owns anything. Same case. Same department. Same people. Just very different stories depending on who’s asking the questions.show more

Dixie Normus

8,156 subscribers

22,576 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

Joe Flipperhead

51,464 views • 1 year ago

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

121,332 views • 2 years ago

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 views • 3 months ago

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” *This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.*

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.

Zach Jones - Secretary of Psyops

121,819 views • 17 days ago

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

Dixie Normus

93,051 views • 8 months ago

So i was just watching Sam B and had similar thouggts, So, Colin is supposedly underage drinking and shot gunning beers all night, bouncing from Leonetti’s house to Fairview then comes home and goes into his mother’s bedroom to kiss her goodnight…And we are supposed to believe nobody had a problem with that?No concern about underage drinking? No questions about where he was? No concern about the timeline?No concern about who saw him, who picked him up, or what was actually happening inside that house?But somehow Chris Albert is upset with us for asking questions? How does Colin Allie Caitlin and Higgins not see the jeep or Higgins if the story is the jeep was at the end of the driveway. The same driveway that he was in before Brian and Nicole, and the same driveway Allie was in when Colin ran out of the house after bumping into Brian and Coco?????? That is the part I cannot get past. Because according to his own brother, “the system let them down at every turn.” Well, if the system let them down, then why is the anger aimed at citizens asking questions and not at the investigators who created the mess? If the investigation was clean, complete, and reliable, there would be nothing to question.But instead, we are told not to ask.Don’t ask about Colin. Don’t ask about the house.Don’t ask about the timeline. Don’t ask about the police work. Don’t ask why the adults’ stories make no sense. Sorry, but that is not how this works.The anger is misplaced. If this family truly believes the system failed them, then the questions should be directed at the people who ran the investigation not at the public still trying to figure out what actually happened. Here is a clip, and a link to her show.

So i was just watching Sam B and had similar thouggts, So, Colin is supposedly underage drinking and shot gunning beers all night, bouncing from Leonetti’s house to Fairview then comes home and goes into his mother’s bedroom to kiss her goodnight…And we are supposed to believe nobody had a problem with that?No concern about underage drinking? No questions about where he was? No concern about the timeline?No concern about who saw him, who picked him up, or what was actually happening inside that house?But somehow Chris Albert is upset with us for asking questions? How does Colin Allie Caitlin and Higgins not see the jeep or Higgins if the story is the jeep was at the end of the driveway. The same driveway that he was in before Brian and Nicole, and the same driveway Allie was in when Colin ran out of the house after bumping into Brian and Coco?????? That is the part I cannot get past. Because according to his own brother, “the system let them down at every turn.” Well, if the system let them down, then why is the anger aimed at citizens asking questions and not at the investigators who created the mess? If the investigation was clean, complete, and reliable, there would be nothing to question.But instead, we are told not to ask.Don’t ask about Colin. Don’t ask about the house.Don’t ask about the timeline. Don’t ask about the police work. Don’t ask why the adults’ stories make no sense. Sorry, but that is not how this works.The anger is misplaced. If this family truly believes the system failed them, then the questions should be directed at the people who ran the investigation not at the public still trying to figure out what actually happened. Here is a clip, and a link to her show.

Dixie Normus

26,394 views • 1 month ago

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

Olivia

479,732 views • 2 years ago

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

195,996 views • 2 years ago

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes

Sensitive content

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes

Dixie Normus

50,689 views • 6 days ago

🇺🇸 TRUMP: IT’S JUSTICE, NOT REVENGE, COMEY IS A DIRTY COP “It’s about justice, really. It’s not revenge. It’s also about the fact that you can’t let this go on. Sick radical left people, and they can’t get away with it. And Comey was one of the people. He wasn’t the biggest, but he’s a dirty cop. He’s always been a dirty cop; everybody knew it. As far as the case is concerned, he gave an answer, and it was a strong answer. He then verified it a couple of times, because that was a very important answer. If he had equivocated, if he had been a little bit less sure, that would have been very bad for him. So he gave an answer. The only problem for him is that he didn’t think he’d get caught. And he got caught." Source: Acyn

🇺🇸 TRUMP: IT’S JUSTICE, NOT REVENGE, COMEY IS A DIRTY COP “It’s about justice, really. It’s not revenge. It’s also about the fact that you can’t let this go on. Sick radical left people, and they can’t get away with it. And Comey was one of the people. He wasn’t the biggest, but he’s a dirty cop. He’s always been a dirty cop; everybody knew it. As far as the case is concerned, he gave an answer, and it was a strong answer. He then verified it a couple of times, because that was a very important answer. If he had equivocated, if he had been a little bit less sure, that would have been very bad for him. So he gave an answer. The only problem for him is that he didn’t think he’d get caught. And he got caught." Source: Acyn

Mario Nawfal

134,379 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨 Per newly-released John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial transcripts (May 24, 2024), undercover ATF Agent Brian Higgins testified or provided information to the US DOJ in Boston under a grant of immunity at some point prior to May of 2024 regarding John's death. Source, pages 127-128 (of 5481) here - Higgins, also according to new documents, was in some kind of bisexual relationship with both John and Karen in the weeks before John's death (that, for some reason, involved "gay men.") Read those text messages here - Furthermore, Higgins was inside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on the night/early morning of January 28th into January 29th of 2022 that John was killed and left to die from a brain hemorrhage and hypothermia on a lawn during a blizzard. In recent weeks, it was also revealed that the state police unit who investigated Karen Read (and who may also have been involved in the coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder by Stoughton police officer, and affiliate of Epstein-linked Stoughton Deputy Chief Robert Devine, Matthew Farwell) were the subject of an intense federal grand jury investigation related to the "performance of the Massachusetts state police" between, at the very least, the summer of 2024 and the early spring of 2024. Read more about the document, from the Brian Walshe, confirming that federal probe of the "performance of the state police" here- That grand jury (which, per the federal information filed against leaker Jessica Leslie, was empaneled by Justice Indra Talwani on May 26, 2022) culminated in a shocking six and a half hour interview of infamous former state trooper Michael Proctor (who worked under Brian Tully at the Norfolk District Attorney's State Police SPDU unit). According to new Internal Affairs documents released about Tully, after Proctor's six hour grilling by then US Attorney For The District Of Massachusetts Josh Levy, Tully and his right-hand man John Fanning (the trooper who wrote the 2021 state police report clearing Farwell for Birchmore's murder initially, prior to federal charges coming down for Farwell in August of 2024) visited Proctor's home and were desperate for information about that federal probe. Read that IA report here - Interestingly, in December of 2023, Brian Tully also used his official position as a state police officer to ask Lindsey Gaetani if she knew information about the "target of the federal probe." When Lindsey (a witness in the orbit of the TurtleBoy and Karen Read cases) told Tully that Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey was the target of the probe, Tully reacted with shock. Interestingly, Tully would have had access to a November 28, 2023, text messages (sent at 6:42PM ET exactly) from TurtleBoy to Lindsey which indicated that Josh Levy wanted to set an obstruction trap for Read trial witness Jen McCabe (who knows Tully personally and speaks to him directly) by comparing the discovery turned over to Karen Read's legal team with records obtained by the DOJ from McCabe's cellphone between February and May of 2022. Here's the transcript of an interview where Lindsey described that moment with Tully; **Grant Smith-Ellis:** Yeah, and Lindsey, let me ask you about something because I kind of might have previewed it before you came on, but I'm very interested to hear you talk about it. Brian Tully alludes in paragraph 79 of the Karen Read search warrant affidavit to a piece of information you told him related to like something about Josh Levy or something. Did Brian Tully—in December of 2023, while the Birchmore investigation was open (we know that now in hindsight)—did he ask you who the targets of the federal probe were? And what did you tell him, and how did he respond? **Lindsey Gaetani:** Yeah, and I said, yeah—from the conversations I had with Aidan, it was implied or alluded to—from either his conversations with Karen or whatever—that the target was Michael Morrissey. And I remember this moment like as if it were yesterday: Tully, at the same exact time as Nelson—they both looked at each other like their heads turned sideways. They both looked at each other, made eye contact, and kind of smirked. And then they looked back at me and continued the questioning. But it was just like—I was frozen in that moment, and I was like—what was that smirk about? Like, was that a smirk of relief? Like, “We are not the target”? Or was that a smirk of like, “Oh good—like, this is what we thought”? Like, I don't know what that was. I don't—I didn't know how to interpret it. I just know what I saw, you know? Source - In any event, on March 7th of 2024, after Tully found out that the DOJ had the contents of Michael proctor's cellphone (showing Proctor used horrifying language towards Karen Read), Tully was then forced to write up a disciplinary report on Proctor. However, before Tully could do so, Tully was forced to sign an NDA with the DOJ (middlewomaned by Norfolk ADA Laura McLaughlin) whereupon Tully was not allowed to see or hold the records from proctor's cellphone. Instead, Tully had to enter a room with McLaughlin and McLaughlin was not permitted (by the DOJ) to allow Tully to see or touch the documents. She read them, in part, to Tully and then he left the room. Furthermore, it is of note that, in July of 2025 (after Karen's second trial resulted in her acquittal for John's death and a guilty verdict on OUI) Michael Proctor, through counsel, told a lawyer in a number of other cases that Proctor investigated (including Myles King and Brian Walshe) that Proctor did not have any phone records to turn over to those defendants because his "old phone was destroyed in November of 2024" and "his new phone auto deletes itself every 30 days." Just a few months later, however, in late August of 2025, "someone" turned over 13 years of Proctor's phone records (including records that showed Proctor "sharing an SA victims name" with third parties, "sharing intimate images" with third parties and, also, potentially using racial slurs against defendants in cases Proctor investigated. Read more background about that timeline and Proctor's phone records here - In light of that information showing up in the Norfolk DA's possession, somehow, and then being turned over to multiple criminal defendants, Proctor then dropped his long-standing appeal of his discharge from the state police and retreated from public life entirely (as did almost all of his friends and allies connected to the Read investigation, many of whom were transferred demoted or involved in strange public scandals wherein the Boston Police Commissioner called them into his office and then lied to the media about it). As a result, it may well be that Brian Higgins is, or was, cooperating as a federal witness against some of the members of the state police unit who were involved in the investigation of John O'Keefe's death (and potentially he coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder). My name is Grant Smith-Ellis and I wrote all of that from memory.

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨 Per newly-released John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial transcripts (May 24, 2024), undercover ATF Agent Brian Higgins testified or provided information to the US DOJ in Boston under a grant of immunity at some point prior to May of 2024 regarding John's death. Source, pages 127-128 (of 5481) here - Higgins, also according to new documents, was in some kind of bisexual relationship with both John and Karen in the weeks before John's death (that, for some reason, involved "gay men.") Read those text messages here - Furthermore, Higgins was inside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on the night/early morning of January 28th into January 29th of 2022 that John was killed and left to die from a brain hemorrhage and hypothermia on a lawn during a blizzard. In recent weeks, it was also revealed that the state police unit who investigated Karen Read (and who may also have been involved in the coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder by Stoughton police officer, and affiliate of Epstein-linked Stoughton Deputy Chief Robert Devine, Matthew Farwell) were the subject of an intense federal grand jury investigation related to the "performance of the Massachusetts state police" between, at the very least, the summer of 2024 and the early spring of 2024. Read more about the document, from the Brian Walshe, confirming that federal probe of the "performance of the state police" here- That grand jury (which, per the federal information filed against leaker Jessica Leslie, was empaneled by Justice Indra Talwani on May 26, 2022) culminated in a shocking six and a half hour interview of infamous former state trooper Michael Proctor (who worked under Brian Tully at the Norfolk District Attorney's State Police SPDU unit). According to new Internal Affairs documents released about Tully, after Proctor's six hour grilling by then US Attorney For The District Of Massachusetts Josh Levy, Tully and his right-hand man John Fanning (the trooper who wrote the 2021 state police report clearing Farwell for Birchmore's murder initially, prior to federal charges coming down for Farwell in August of 2024) visited Proctor's home and were desperate for information about that federal probe. Read that IA report here - Interestingly, in December of 2023, Brian Tully also used his official position as a state police officer to ask Lindsey Gaetani if she knew information about the "target of the federal probe." When Lindsey (a witness in the orbit of the TurtleBoy and Karen Read cases) told Tully that Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey was the target of the probe, Tully reacted with shock. Interestingly, Tully would have had access to a November 28, 2023, text messages (sent at 6:42PM ET exactly) from TurtleBoy to Lindsey which indicated that Josh Levy wanted to set an obstruction trap for Read trial witness Jen McCabe (who knows Tully personally and speaks to him directly) by comparing the discovery turned over to Karen Read's legal team with records obtained by the DOJ from McCabe's cellphone between February and May of 2022. Here's the transcript of an interview where Lindsey described that moment with Tully; Grant Smith-Ellis: Yeah, and Lindsey, let me ask you about something because I kind of might have previewed it before you came on, but I'm very interested to hear you talk about it. Brian Tully alludes in paragraph 79 of the Karen Read search warrant affidavit to a piece of information you told him related to like something about Josh Levy or something. Did Brian Tully—in December of 2023, while the Birchmore investigation was open (we know that now in hindsight)—did he ask you who the targets of the federal probe were? And what did you tell him, and how did he respond? Lindsey Gaetani: Yeah, and I said, yeah—from the conversations I had with Aidan, it was implied or alluded to—from either his conversations with Karen or whatever—that the target was Michael Morrissey. And I remember this moment like as if it were yesterday: Tully, at the same exact time as Nelson—they both looked at each other like their heads turned sideways. They both looked at each other, made eye contact, and kind of smirked. And then they looked back at me and continued the questioning. But it was just like—I was frozen in that moment, and I was like—what was that smirk about? Like, was that a smirk of relief? Like, “We are not the target”? Or was that a smirk of like, “Oh good—like, this is what we thought”? Like, I don't know what that was. I don't—I didn't know how to interpret it. I just know what I saw, you know? Source - In any event, on March 7th of 2024, after Tully found out that the DOJ had the contents of Michael proctor's cellphone (showing Proctor used horrifying language towards Karen Read), Tully was then forced to write up a disciplinary report on Proctor. However, before Tully could do so, Tully was forced to sign an NDA with the DOJ (middlewomaned by Norfolk ADA Laura McLaughlin) whereupon Tully was not allowed to see or hold the records from proctor's cellphone. Instead, Tully had to enter a room with McLaughlin and McLaughlin was not permitted (by the DOJ) to allow Tully to see or touch the documents. She read them, in part, to Tully and then he left the room. Furthermore, it is of note that, in July of 2025 (after Karen's second trial resulted in her acquittal for John's death and a guilty verdict on OUI) Michael Proctor, through counsel, told a lawyer in a number of other cases that Proctor investigated (including Myles King and Brian Walshe) that Proctor did not have any phone records to turn over to those defendants because his "old phone was destroyed in November of 2024" and "his new phone auto deletes itself every 30 days." Just a few months later, however, in late August of 2025, "someone" turned over 13 years of Proctor's phone records (including records that showed Proctor "sharing an SA victims name" with third parties, "sharing intimate images" with third parties and, also, potentially using racial slurs against defendants in cases Proctor investigated. Read more background about that timeline and Proctor's phone records here - In light of that information showing up in the Norfolk DA's possession, somehow, and then being turned over to multiple criminal defendants, Proctor then dropped his long-standing appeal of his discharge from the state police and retreated from public life entirely (as did almost all of his friends and allies connected to the Read investigation, many of whom were transferred demoted or involved in strange public scandals wherein the Boston Police Commissioner called them into his office and then lied to the media about it). As a result, it may well be that Brian Higgins is, or was, cooperating as a federal witness against some of the members of the state police unit who were involved in the investigation of John O'Keefe's death (and potentially he coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder). My name is Grant Smith-Ellis and I wrote all of that from memory.

Grant Smith Ellis

50,303 views • 5 months ago

Last night, the House Defendant YouTube channel made a very confident claim that simply does not match the record. One of the panelists stated that “by 7:00 p.m. on the first day, they already knew what happened to John,” and went on to say that Proctor and Yuri, UMMM WELL "didn't step on to the scene until, I don't remember the time right now” newsflash…. They didn't the 1st day! interviewed people at Jen’s house, Went to dighton saw John’s body, saw the taillight, and “put it all together” that same day. That version of events is not just casual, it’s wrong. Here Is the Actual, Documented Sequence Proctor and Yuri’s movements on January 29th are not a mystery. 1st it was Canton Police Department Then to Jen McCabe’s house on County Lane, next to the hospital, and off to Dighton, to seize Karen Read’s vehicle, and finished up with Back to Canton PD They never went to 34 Fairview that day. Not once. The “Nine People” Claim Doesn’t Hold Either The channel also claimed that “nine people said John never came in the house.” That is not accurate for that day. On January 29th, Proctor and Yuri spoke to Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Kerry Roberts That’s five people, not nine. Others were not interviewed until later. You don’t get to retroactively stack statements and pretend they all existed on Day One. This channel repeatedly says “we leave no stone unturned.” But leaving no stone unturned requires, correct sequencing, accurate attribution, and resisting the urge to fill gaps with confidence. Saying investigators “knew by 7:00 that night” isn’t just an opinion, it’s a claim about process, timing, and evidence. And when you check it against the record, it collapses.

Last night, the House Defendant YouTube channel made a very confident claim that simply does not match the record. One of the panelists stated that “by 7:00 p.m. on the first day, they already knew what happened to John,” and went on to say that Proctor and Yuri, UMMM WELL "didn't step on to the scene until, I don't remember the time right now” newsflash…. They didn't the 1st day! interviewed people at Jen’s house, Went to dighton saw John’s body, saw the taillight, and “put it all together” that same day. That version of events is not just casual, it’s wrong. Here Is the Actual, Documented Sequence Proctor and Yuri’s movements on January 29th are not a mystery. 1st it was Canton Police Department Then to Jen McCabe’s house on County Lane, next to the hospital, and off to Dighton, to seize Karen Read’s vehicle, and finished up with Back to Canton PD They never went to 34 Fairview that day. Not once. The “Nine People” Claim Doesn’t Hold Either The channel also claimed that “nine people said John never came in the house.” That is not accurate for that day. On January 29th, Proctor and Yuri spoke to Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Kerry Roberts That’s five people, not nine. Others were not interviewed until later. You don’t get to retroactively stack statements and pretend they all existed on Day One. This channel repeatedly says “we leave no stone unturned.” But leaving no stone unturned requires, correct sequencing, accurate attribution, and resisting the urge to fill gaps with confidence. Saying investigators “knew by 7:00 that night” isn’t just an opinion, it’s a claim about process, timing, and evidence. And when you check it against the record, it collapses.

Dixie Normus

25,012 views • 7 months ago

Millions and millions of Americans know what they saw was not a 30-06 wound. It’s not just unlikely it’s not possible. Joe Rogan is an elk hunter. Nick Fuentes says you’re a fool if you don’t think that the round was “stopped by his skin that acted like a trampoline.” Nick Fuentes is not an elk hunter he is a queeny bitchy liar who has definitely never shot a gun. It’s awesome that people like Candace and baron coleman are doing very detailed breakdowns of the event, but it’s also easy for normal people who can’t invest the time to look into why various details are important. There’s a difference between trying to solve the crime and why the official story is wrong. There’s neck wound was not from the claimed murder weapon. That’s a fact. In this country you are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Tyler Robinson not only had reasonable doubt, it isn’t possible. And if you don’t care about that because he’s some dirty little fury or because you can’t stand Candace Owens, just know that whatever you sign off on for him will eventually be applied to you.

Millions and millions of Americans know what they saw was not a 30-06 wound. It’s not just unlikely it’s not possible. Joe Rogan is an elk hunter. Nick Fuentes says you’re a fool if you don’t think that the round was “stopped by his skin that acted like a trampoline.” Nick Fuentes is not an elk hunter he is a queeny bitchy liar who has definitely never shot a gun. It’s awesome that people like Candace and baron coleman are doing very detailed breakdowns of the event, but it’s also easy for normal people who can’t invest the time to look into why various details are important. There’s a difference between trying to solve the crime and why the official story is wrong. There’s neck wound was not from the claimed murder weapon. That’s a fact. In this country you are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Tyler Robinson not only had reasonable doubt, it isn’t possible. And if you don’t care about that because he’s some dirty little fury or because you can’t stand Candace Owens, just know that whatever you sign off on for him will eventually be applied to you.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

283,093 views • 1 month ago

Kerry Roberts complained about being a “victim” of “harassment” for “the crime of telling the truth” yesterday on Good Morning America. Then she took the witness stand & admitted to lying under oath & committing perjury at a grand jury to protect Jen McCabe. The Feds are the ONLY reason we know this information. What does that tell you? These witnesses are comfortable lying under oath at the state grand jury because they know they’ve got immunity from DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. They’re protected. But suddenly, once under investigation by the Feds, and under the threat of federal perjury charges while on the witness stand at a federal grand jury, a whole lot of admissions and truth started coming out. This is also why Brian Higgins testified (at the federal grand jury) that he saw someone, that fit John O’Keefe’s criteria, enter the house. Higgins didn’t know what the Feds knew at the time, and being an ATF agent, he’s surely well aware of the fact that he could be facing prison time for lying to a federal agent. The only reason Kerry Roberts changed her testimony and told the truth—that she never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google anything—was because she knew she no longer had the protection of her friends at the federal grand jury. This is what the general public finds so outrageous about these “witnesses”. It’s how they brazenly lie to your face to frame an innocent woman for a murder she did not commit, and then if you dare call them on it, they have to make themselves “victims” by whining and crying about “hawassment” and “witness intimidation”. The public is going to be critical and unfavorable of you when you willingly lie to coverup and frame someone else for murder. That’s a necessary age-old aspect of society called “shame”. If you don’t like it, don’t lie or do shameful things. It’s really that simple. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Kerry Roberts complained about being a “victim” of “harassment” for “the crime of telling the truth” yesterday on Good Morning America. Then she took the witness stand & admitted to lying under oath & committing perjury at a grand jury to protect Jen McCabe. The Feds are the ONLY reason we know this information. What does that tell you? These witnesses are comfortable lying under oath at the state grand jury because they know they’ve got immunity from DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. They’re protected. But suddenly, once under investigation by the Feds, and under the threat of federal perjury charges while on the witness stand at a federal grand jury, a whole lot of admissions and truth started coming out. This is also why Brian Higgins testified (at the federal grand jury) that he saw someone, that fit John O’Keefe’s criteria, enter the house. Higgins didn’t know what the Feds knew at the time, and being an ATF agent, he’s surely well aware of the fact that he could be facing prison time for lying to a federal agent. The only reason Kerry Roberts changed her testimony and told the truth—that she never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google anything—was because she knew she no longer had the protection of her friends at the federal grand jury. This is what the general public finds so outrageous about these “witnesses”. It’s how they brazenly lie to your face to frame an innocent woman for a murder she did not commit, and then if you dare call them on it, they have to make themselves “victims” by whining and crying about “hawassment” and “witness intimidation”. The public is going to be critical and unfavorable of you when you willingly lie to coverup and frame someone else for murder. That’s a necessary age-old aspect of society called “shame”. If you don’t like it, don’t lie or do shameful things. It’s really that simple. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

58,743 views • 1 year ago

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 views • 8 months ago

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

Dixie Normus

32,143 views • 9 days ago

20/20 Proctor Interview. 20/20 how do you not know basics. McAlberts entered the picture well before Jackson - 4 months prior Karen said it as recorded on a MSP body cam “Strikingly absent from his funeral was Karen Read” - yeah there was a court order to stay away. She would have been arrested …. but I digress…. *** SPOILER ALERT *** Proctor pretends not to know the McAlberts still. Forgot to mention Kevin Albert. Colin. Having Julie as nanny No mention of the bribe Proctor’s bad feelings toward Karen progressed as the case went on… apparently that’s 10pm same day “No evidence” of planted taillight. Absolutely none. Probably bc people didn’t read the weather report he wrote Loud minority are against the corrupt 🤣 they “boo us” crazy ex gf thinking it was them not McAlberts Witness after said John never came in the house - no mention no one (+4 others) saw him on the lawn Solo cups and Stop & Shop - “unusual way” of collecting evidence and may have done “the best they could” Prosecution thinks the sucky investigation (my words) doesn’t impact the integrity of the investigation He’s not biased Proctor says - apparent only the world & MSP said he was “They don’t care what the evidence is” - Proctor (ironically and ridiculously) Texts were regrettable and he was sad bc it was a police office - but imo not sad enough to do a proper investigation “Wouldn’t change a thing” about the investigation Cried handing his uniform over but not performing a piss poor investigation or pinning on the girl It’s the internet’s fault

20/20 Proctor Interview. 20/20 how do you not know basics. McAlberts entered the picture well before Jackson - 4 months prior Karen said it as recorded on a MSP body cam “Strikingly absent from his funeral was Karen Read” - yeah there was a court order to stay away. She would have been arrested …. but I digress…. * SPOILER ALERT * Proctor pretends not to know the McAlberts still. Forgot to mention Kevin Albert. Colin. Having Julie as nanny No mention of the bribe Proctor’s bad feelings toward Karen progressed as the case went on… apparently that’s 10pm same day “No evidence” of planted taillight. Absolutely none. Probably bc people didn’t read the weather report he wrote Loud minority are against the corrupt 🤣 they “boo us” crazy ex gf thinking it was them not McAlberts Witness after said John never came in the house - no mention no one (+4 others) saw him on the lawn Solo cups and Stop & Shop - “unusual way” of collecting evidence and may have done “the best they could” Prosecution thinks the sucky investigation (my words) doesn’t impact the integrity of the investigation He’s not biased Proctor says - apparent only the world & MSP said he was “They don’t care what the evidence is” - Proctor (ironically and ridiculously) Texts were regrettable and he was sad bc it was a police office - but imo not sad enough to do a proper investigation “Wouldn’t change a thing” about the investigation Cried handing his uniform over but not performing a piss poor investigation or pinning on the girl It’s the internet’s fault

Brooklyn James

40,121 views • 1 year ago

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 views • 5 months ago

And, right on cue, the Kate Peter-aligned trolls come out of the woodwork to use Lindsey Gaetani as a distraction in order to protect Michael Proctor, Brian Tully and Jen McCabe. Kate only has a few dangerous Discord operatives left, and even Jason Broyles seems to be skittish. TRANSCRIPT: This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's not—I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a huge—it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn't—when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.

Grant Smith Ellis

14,358 views • 8 months ago