Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Michael Proctor attorney Daniel Moynihan’s opening statement, only reinforced my belief that Michael Proctor should’ve never been terminated, and Michael Proctor deserves his job back. Michael Proctor is another casualty of the despicable, unethical, and potential criminal behavior of Karen Read, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, and the blogger known...

Andieldufrense's profile picture

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

1,723 subscribers

21,419 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:55

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,321 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice
0:31

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

Olivia

476,977 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

#KarenReadRetrial Imagine being Aidan Kearney and being so "invested" in Karen Read being acquitted that you are willing to spread absolute fabrications for the defense even though there are documented emails in the case exhibits from Read's own attorney, Elizabeth Little, which confirm Karen Read and David Yanetti have lied and twisted the incident. In the first trial, Michael Proctor testified that when he began going through Read's phone he was forced to stop as he came across attorney client privileged communication. This is 100% absolute fact. Proctor saw two text messages between Read and DUI attorney Jack Diamond which the defense later claimed as privileged per the below email. After the trial in the Vanity Fair article both Read and Yanetti claimed Proctor lied on the stand about this and Read had not communicated with Yanetti. A calculated and dishonest twisting of facts since Proctor never named the attorney in his testimony. So in conclusion, yes Proctor saw privileged texts and yes Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, and David Yanetti are flat out lying. Why are they so afraid of the truth?
0:59

#KarenReadRetrial Imagine being Aidan Kearney and being so "invested" in Karen Read being acquitted that you are willing to spread absolute fabrications for the defense even though there are documented emails in the case exhibits from Read's own attorney, Elizabeth Little, which confirm Karen Read and David Yanetti have lied and twisted the incident. In the first trial, Michael Proctor testified that when he began going through Read's phone he was forced to stop as he came across attorney client privileged communication. This is 100% absolute fact. Proctor saw two text messages between Read and DUI attorney Jack Diamond which the defense later claimed as privileged per the below email. After the trial in the Vanity Fair article both Read and Yanetti claimed Proctor lied on the stand about this and Read had not communicated with Yanetti. A calculated and dishonest twisting of facts since Proctor never named the attorney in his testimony. So in conclusion, yes Proctor saw privileged texts and yes Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, and David Yanetti are flat out lying. Why are they so afraid of the truth?

Julie Carpenter

19,383 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:44

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

69,914 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).
3:04

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

Grant Smith Ellis

14,237 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Karen Read's lawyers have revealed, in open court, that former State Police Trooper Michael Proctor used anti-Semitic language in "secret" conversations on Proctor's cellphone (and that Proctor sent pictures of naked women, without their knowledge or consent, to his friends). Proctor, said Read's lawyers, also used racist, anti-female and homophobic language. Karen's lawyers have Proctor's entire phone, and are asking Judge Doolin for permission to use the messages in Karen's upcoming civil suit against the State Police and the Town of Canton.
6:24

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Karen Read's lawyers have revealed, in open court, that former State Police Trooper Michael Proctor used anti-Semitic language in "secret" conversations on Proctor's cellphone (and that Proctor sent pictures of naked women, without their knowledge or consent, to his friends). Proctor, said Read's lawyers, also used racist, anti-female and homophobic language. Karen's lawyers have Proctor's entire phone, and are asking Judge Doolin for permission to use the messages in Karen's upcoming civil suit against the State Police and the Town of Canton.

Grant Smith Ellis

37,721 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Michael Proctor, and his colleagues, framed Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe and then he sent horrific text messages to his own superiors, friends, colleagues, and family members about her less than 24 hours after the death of John O'Keefe but he thinks he needs his job back because basically "other officers have done it too and didn't get fired"? He is a disgrace to the badge and gun he carried. In his own words: He's fucked. #MichaelProctor #KarenRead #CorruptCop
7:41

Michael Proctor, and his colleagues, framed Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe and then he sent horrific text messages to his own superiors, friends, colleagues, and family members about her less than 24 hours after the death of John O'Keefe but he thinks he needs his job back because basically "other officers have done it too and didn't get fired"? He is a disgrace to the badge and gun he carried. In his own words: He's fucked. #MichaelProctor #KarenRead #CorruptCop

That Girl T

20,037 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

After his client, Aidan Kearney, has spent weeks trying to disrupt a fundraising event for the witnesses in the Karen Read case by falsely claiming the witnesses are "white supremacists", Brian Entin allowed Mark Bederow to come on his show and further plant the seed by suggesting Michael Proctor's texts were so pervasive in his daily life that the witnesses may have known. The witnesses have NOTHING to do with Michael Proctor's texts. They had NO connection to Michael Proctor prior to John O'Keefe's death. It is beyond inappropriate to even suggest they would know about these texts. And Mark Bederow KNOWS that. Incredibly reckless to allow the attorney of the man charged with multiple felony intimidation charges for the harassment of these witnesses, the same witnesses who have filed a massive defamation suit against him, to go on your platform and once again smear the witnesses with unwarranted and highly defamatory speculation.
0:25

After his client, Aidan Kearney, has spent weeks trying to disrupt a fundraising event for the witnesses in the Karen Read case by falsely claiming the witnesses are "white supremacists", Brian Entin allowed Mark Bederow to come on his show and further plant the seed by suggesting Michael Proctor's texts were so pervasive in his daily life that the witnesses may have known. The witnesses have NOTHING to do with Michael Proctor's texts. They had NO connection to Michael Proctor prior to John O'Keefe's death. It is beyond inappropriate to even suggest they would know about these texts. And Mark Bederow KNOWS that. Incredibly reckless to allow the attorney of the man charged with multiple felony intimidation charges for the harassment of these witnesses, the same witnesses who have filed a massive defamation suit against him, to go on your platform and once again smear the witnesses with unwarranted and highly defamatory speculation.

Julie Carpenter

23,117 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

In yet another instance of stunning dishonesty, Aidan Kearney goes on his new cohort, Grant Ellis Smith's, Spaces to spread his propaganda and disinformation. Yesterday, protected discovery that Aidan Kearney freely admits he shared with at least one person outside his legal team found its way onto this platform. In the past few weeks, protected discovery has routinely been leaked here. The message was from Michael Proctor. In it, Proctor is upset at the harassment being directed toward the witnesses, specifically Colin Albert, and himself. Proctor claims Kearney posted a video of Proctor changing his infant son's diaper. Seconds before showing the video, Kearney had leaked Colin Albert's cell phone number to his audience. He had also published several threats to Colin before this date, including telling the young man he would disrupt all of his football games and practices. Last night Kearney blatantly lied about the publishing of the video in hopes to get his demented followers to believe Proctor and MSP were framing him. Left is Kearney lying, right is Kearney publishing said video in a live 5 days before Proctor sent message as well as the leaked protected discovery message.
0:47

In yet another instance of stunning dishonesty, Aidan Kearney goes on his new cohort, Grant Ellis Smith's, Spaces to spread his propaganda and disinformation. Yesterday, protected discovery that Aidan Kearney freely admits he shared with at least one person outside his legal team found its way onto this platform. In the past few weeks, protected discovery has routinely been leaked here. The message was from Michael Proctor. In it, Proctor is upset at the harassment being directed toward the witnesses, specifically Colin Albert, and himself. Proctor claims Kearney posted a video of Proctor changing his infant son's diaper. Seconds before showing the video, Kearney had leaked Colin Albert's cell phone number to his audience. He had also published several threats to Colin before this date, including telling the young man he would disrupt all of his football games and practices. Last night Kearney blatantly lied about the publishing of the video in hopes to get his demented followers to believe Proctor and MSP were framing him. Left is Kearney lying, right is Kearney publishing said video in a live 5 days before Proctor sent message as well as the leaked protected discovery message.

Julie Carpenter

13,745 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption
2:50

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Michael Proctor truly believed that his "gotcha" moment was when he destroyed his old cell phone, replaced that phone and set it to auto-delete after 30 days. Unbeknownst to him, his phone extraction, which was ordered in August of 2025, was successful back to the year of 2013. Trooper Proctor thought that he was safe. That his communications regarding topics like Karen Read, the John O'Keefe murder investigation, his job suspension and firing, and other important cases in the county were auto-deleted from his phone. He was so confident that he did several national interviews proclaiming his innocence. That calling Read vulgar names was a joke.. a figure of speech. He never thought that his phone extraction would pull over a decades worth of data which might show his communications regarding the John O'Keefe murder was not a one-off situation but rather a pattern. A pattern of behavior where he, and most likely his cops buddies, mock defendants and/or victims. Where it was normalized to share private details with those that shouldn't know critical and intimate parts of the cases he worked on. There has been a rumor swirling for some time that photographs were potentially being passed around by Norfolk County state police officers when data extractions were completed on the devices of female defendants/victims. It's been speculated that it was the norm to specifically look for images of women. That they made the rounds of the various group chats. Was this true and did it affect the cases of Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, or Ana Walshe? But no.. no.. according to Proctor, the Read extractions were a lapse in judgement. A one time occurrence.
0:46

Michael Proctor truly believed that his "gotcha" moment was when he destroyed his old cell phone, replaced that phone and set it to auto-delete after 30 days. Unbeknownst to him, his phone extraction, which was ordered in August of 2025, was successful back to the year of 2013. Trooper Proctor thought that he was safe. That his communications regarding topics like Karen Read, the John O'Keefe murder investigation, his job suspension and firing, and other important cases in the county were auto-deleted from his phone. He was so confident that he did several national interviews proclaiming his innocence. That calling Read vulgar names was a joke.. a figure of speech. He never thought that his phone extraction would pull over a decades worth of data which might show his communications regarding the John O'Keefe murder was not a one-off situation but rather a pattern. A pattern of behavior where he, and most likely his cops buddies, mock defendants and/or victims. Where it was normalized to share private details with those that shouldn't know critical and intimate parts of the cases he worked on. There has been a rumor swirling for some time that photographs were potentially being passed around by Norfolk County state police officers when data extractions were completed on the devices of female defendants/victims. It's been speculated that it was the norm to specifically look for images of women. That they made the rounds of the various group chats. Was this true and did it affect the cases of Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, or Ana Walshe? But no.. no.. according to Proctor, the Read extractions were a lapse in judgement. A one time occurrence.

BoozeyBeauty

67,936 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋
4:10

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.
1:37

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Britt Happens

35,332 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Tim Pool did you know that the Norfolk County district attorney Michael Morrissey aired this video on national television before the Karen Read trial began claiming Officer John O’Keefe’s injuries were inconsistent with a fight and his arm injuries were inconsistent with an animal attack. We now know that is untrue. He also says head detective Michael Proctor did not have an opportunity to contaminate the crime scene and he had no personal connections to the people that owned the house lawn where John was found on 1/29/2022 we now know that is false. Then he claims that these people did nothing wrong whatsoever and if you watch them testify you will see they are not telling the truth. Lastly, he preaches about assigning guilt to these witnesses while simultaneously assigning guilt to Karen Read before court proceedings even began! Aidan Kearney was shining a light on this corruption which led to 2 trials and the acquittal of Read. The head detective Proctor has been terminated from the Ma. State Police..now the government and McAlberts are doing everything to silence him. Please watch this
3:33

Tim Pool did you know that the Norfolk County district attorney Michael Morrissey aired this video on national television before the Karen Read trial began claiming Officer John O’Keefe’s injuries were inconsistent with a fight and his arm injuries were inconsistent with an animal attack. We now know that is untrue. He also says head detective Michael Proctor did not have an opportunity to contaminate the crime scene and he had no personal connections to the people that owned the house lawn where John was found on 1/29/2022 we now know that is false. Then he claims that these people did nothing wrong whatsoever and if you watch them testify you will see they are not telling the truth. Lastly, he preaches about assigning guilt to these witnesses while simultaneously assigning guilt to Karen Read before court proceedings even began! Aidan Kearney was shining a light on this corruption which led to 2 trials and the acquittal of Read. The head detective Proctor has been terminated from the Ma. State Police..now the government and McAlberts are doing everything to silence him. Please watch this

Robert Cosgrove

20,299 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#MICHAEL is a film that was made by the Jackson estate to highlight the good of Michael Jackson and to stand up to the Legacy Media that dragged his name for decades. If the media and haters can say what they want without any consequences or even proof then why can’t his family tell you the real story of Michael Jackson? Despite the hate, the film is close to $250M worldwide. Jaafar Jackson was phenomenal, the musical sequences were so satisfying and I absolutely adored seeing this innocent and kind side to Michael. He did so much good and people were literally obsessed with his glorious music. Once labeled the King of Pop is STILL THE KING. 👑
2:59

#MICHAEL is a film that was made by the Jackson estate to highlight the good of Michael Jackson and to stand up to the Legacy Media that dragged his name for decades. If the media and haters can say what they want without any consequences or even proof then why can’t his family tell you the real story of Michael Jackson? Despite the hate, the film is close to $250M worldwide. Jaafar Jackson was phenomenal, the musical sequences were so satisfying and I absolutely adored seeing this innocent and kind side to Michael. He did so much good and people were literally obsessed with his glorious music. Once labeled the King of Pop is STILL THE KING. 👑

MoviesThatMaher

14,133 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“We now know that was a LIE.” ——Karen Read’s Attorney, Mr. David Yannetti Hos many more times does DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its “witnesses” have to be caught in their own lies for this false, malicious prosecution to be dropped? Attorney David Yannetti first inspired me back when I watched #KarenRead’s motion hearing in the Spring of 2023. I’d never seen a defense attorney so steadfastly committed to defending his client’s rights and upholding the Constitution, as Mr. Yannetti was and is. He reminds us why those rights are so imperative to the pursuit of truth and justice. His passion and unwavering confidence in Karen Read’s innocence was unmistakable. Thank you, Mr. Yannetti for bringing the truth to light. While the public’s trust in its institutions may be invariably damaged as a result of the massive corruption and abuse of power exposed by this case, you’ve certainly reminded us all what integrity looks like. David Yannetti #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonMA #MassachusettsStatePolice #PoliceCorruption
1:18

“We now know that was a LIE.” ——Karen Read’s Attorney, Mr. David Yannetti Hos many more times does DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its “witnesses” have to be caught in their own lies for this false, malicious prosecution to be dropped? Attorney David Yannetti first inspired me back when I watched #KarenRead’s motion hearing in the Spring of 2023. I’d never seen a defense attorney so steadfastly committed to defending his client’s rights and upholding the Constitution, as Mr. Yannetti was and is. He reminds us why those rights are so imperative to the pursuit of truth and justice. His passion and unwavering confidence in Karen Read’s innocence was unmistakable. Thank you, Mr. Yannetti for bringing the truth to light. While the public’s trust in its institutions may be invariably damaged as a result of the massive corruption and abuse of power exposed by this case, you’ve certainly reminded us all what integrity looks like. David Yannetti #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonMA #MassachusettsStatePolice #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

158,287 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:23

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

121,332 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -
9:43

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

Grant Smith Ellis

71,268 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The McAlbert “I STAND WITH PROCTOR” official YouTube channel is hosting a show this evening to continue criticizing the jurors, namely Paula and Charlie, who have been subject to constant racist comments from the McAlbert camp on the same day Michael Proctor’s racist texts were released. “What is an Uncle Tom?” - McAlbert spokeswoman Kate Peter to jury foreman Charlie DeLoach “Does this mf’er want revenge on white cops?” - McAlbert defender and family friend Joe Warren to Charlie DeLoach “Michael Proctor is the cleanest cop in the history of the police.” - McAlbert spokesman Kevin Lenihan
1:50

The McAlbert “I STAND WITH PROCTOR” official YouTube channel is hosting a show this evening to continue criticizing the jurors, namely Paula and Charlie, who have been subject to constant racist comments from the McAlbert camp on the same day Michael Proctor’s racist texts were released. “What is an Uncle Tom?” - McAlbert spokeswoman Kate Peter to jury foreman Charlie DeLoach “Does this mf’er want revenge on white cops?” - McAlbert defender and family friend Joe Warren to Charlie DeLoach “Michael Proctor is the cleanest cop in the history of the police.” - McAlbert spokesman Kevin Lenihan

Lara

16,352 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce