Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Is biological aging actually reversible? De Grey believes it will eventually be possible. Kaeberlein is the complete opposite: "I think it's almost impossible, if not impossible, to completely reverse biological aging." His reason is simple. "You can't reverse entropy." However, does believe you can improve health and parts of...

23,401 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This is WILD! Ray Kurzweil, the futurist who predicted the internet, smartphones, and AI says aging ends by 2032 (Save this) Kurzweil, now 78 years old, told a live audience that humanity will reach longevity escape velocity by 2032 and he explained exactly what that means with mathematical precision. Right now, for every year you live, you get back approximately five months of life expectancy from medical and scientific progress meaning you are losing roughly seven months of net life per calendar year. Longevity escape velocity is the threshold where that ratio flips, for every year you live, you get back a full year or more from scientific progress, meaning your biological clock starts running backward. Kurzweil's prediction is that threshold hits by 2032 and beyond that point, you do not simply stop dying of aging, you actively get younger every year. The mechanism is AI-driven drug discovery at a scale that was physically impossible five years ago. By 2030, Kurzweil argues, AI will be able to take a biological problem, generate millions of potential drug candidates, screen all of them, and run trials on simulated digital populations compressing decades of clinical research into weeks. This is already happening. David Sinclair's lab at Harvard used AI to virtually screen 8 billion molecules against aging targets and is now preparing human trials moving from $400,000 gene therapies toward a $100 pill that can reset biological age by 50 to 95% in four weeks. Sinclair has already demonstrated the ability to reverse aging in mammals restoring sight in mice with optic nerve damage and reversing Alzheimer's symptoms in lab models. Kurzweil's track record is what makes the 2032 claim impossible to dismiss. He predicted the internet's global dominance in 1990, the defeat of a world chess champion by a computer in 1998, pocket-sized devices as primary communications tools in 1999, and AI passing professional exams in the mid-2020s, all before anyone else was saying it publicly. If you are under 60 and in reasonable health, his message is stay alive, stay healthy, and get to 2032. The tools on the other side of that date will be unlike anything medicine has ever produced.

Milk Road AI

959,925 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

New episode with Dr. Steve Horvath (Prof Steve Horvath), a pioneer in the field of epigenetic aging clocks. Steve developed the original Horvath clock, one of the first tools to show that DNA methylation carries a remarkably reliable signal of aging across human tissues. In this episode, he explains what biological clocks actually measure, why different clocks can disagree, and how to interpret a biological-age result without treating it like a literal lifespan forecast. We talk about chronological age vs. biological age, and we also get into the intervention evidence on exercise and VO2 max, calorie restriction, omega-3s, vitamin D, multivitamins, and weight loss/GLP-1 therapy, among other topics! The big theme is that biological clocks can be useful dashboards, but they are not diagnoses, fortune-telling tools, or proof that one supplement has reversed aging. This was Steve's second appearance on the podcast and he did not disappoint. You won't want to miss this episode. Links to the episode on all platforms in the comments below. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 1:59 - Biological vs. chronological age 7:33 - Why one clock isn't enough 13:16 - PhenoAge vs. GrimAge 15:21 - GrimAge & mortality risk 19:04 - Epigenome as stress memory 23:02 - Can stress be inherited? 25:06 - Why clocks fail in sperm 26:30 - Can lifestyle reverse GrimAge? 28:18 - DunedinPACE as an odometer 32:20 - Judging longevity interventions 34:41 - Clocks as mortality surrogates 38:28 - Most validated interventions 41:25 - 5 years younger in 7 months? 45:43 - Can GrimAge predict death? 47:30 - Translating GrimAge to lifespan 52:16 - Blind spots of aging clocks 58:20 - More than inflammation 1:00:56 - Young blood, transient effects 1:04:46 - Calorie restriction 1:08:54 - GLP-1 drugs & weight loss 1:12:24 - Can a multivitamin slow aging? 1:21:05 - Omega-3, vitamin D, & exercise 1:28:55 - Removing an aging accelerator 1:31:24 - Vegetables vs. exercise 1:36:58 - Does red meat age you? 1:38:38 - Hard training moves the clock 1:45:59 - Heat as an exercise mimetic 1:47:23 - When cold slows the clock 1:49:48 - Does poor sleep speed aging? 1:51:19 - Can friendship slow aging? 1:57:49 - Are consumer tests worth it? 2:02:46 - Choosing a reliable test 2:07:33 - Different clocks, different lenses 2:12:21 - Can AI build better clocks? 2:13:53 - Partial reprogramming 2:17:47 - What reprogramming can't fix 2:22:37 - Do DNA mutations drive aging? 2:24:53 - The silver bullet problem 2:29:23 - Limits of polygenic risk 2:33:32 - Steve's longevity routine 2:38:05 - How stress affects aging

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

81,963 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce