正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Kimi K3 is really, really good.

Theo - t3.gg

380,656 subscribers

323,514 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术喜剧健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Kimi K3 is not Fable, sorry folks. My benchmark proves it definitively. 🥲 Here's Rocket League as imagined by K3. It's honestly pretty good but nowhere near the polish I was hoping for. It does make some really nice UIs though.

Kimi K3 is not Fable, sorry folks. My benchmark proves it definitively. 🥲 Here's Rocket League as imagined by K3. It's honestly pretty good but nowhere near the polish I was hoping for. It does make some really nice UIs though.

am.will

70,040 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kimi K3 by Kimi.ai really outperforms in 3D landscapes and scenes - here are 11 examples showing why it places 1st:

Kimi K3 by Kimi.ai really outperforms in 3D landscapes and scenes - here are 11 examples showing why it places 1st:

Oliver Johansson

14,861 次观看 • 1 个月前

"A really great guy and a really good friend" 🥰 Kimi Antonelli 🤝 Jannik Sinner #Wimbledon

"A really great guy and a really good friend" 🥰 Kimi Antonelli 🤝 Jannik Sinner #Wimbledon

BBC Sport

58,979 次观看 • 1 个月前

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3 tested both models on same prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > 5.3 flash took 20 minutes to complete this and costed $0.7 via AIhubMix API > kimi k3 took 30 minutes to complete this and costed $4.32 via Kimi Plan which one do you think did better here?

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3 tested both models on same prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > 5.3 flash took 20 minutes to complete this and costed $0.7 via AIhubMix API > kimi k3 took 30 minutes to complete this and costed $4.32 via Kimi Plan which one do you think did better here?

J A Z I I

23,105 次观看 • 7 天前

⏰ 72 HOURS AGO, KIMI K3 DROPPED Here are the MOST IMPRESSIVE RESULTS since K3 is literally Open Source Fable 5 but 5x cheaper (Fable $1.30 vs. Kimi K3 $0.25) Kimi is better + more token-efficient and 100% OPEN SOURCE!!! They completely changed the game Now that you've had 72 hours with it, what's your favorite thing about Kimi K3 so far?

⏰ 72 HOURS AGO, KIMI K3 DROPPED Here are the MOST IMPRESSIVE RESULTS since K3 is literally Open Source Fable 5 but 5x cheaper (Fable $1.30 vs. Kimi K3 $0.25) Kimi is better + more token-efficient and 100% OPEN SOURCE!!! They completely changed the game Now that you've had 72 hours with it, what's your favorite thing about Kimi K3 so far?

Mark Santos

19,627 次观看 • 1 个月前

🤯Kimi K3 mogs GPT-5.6 Sol on frontend design The features are similar but Kimi has much better taste and 3D capabilities. The design overall is also way better and more elegant on Kimi's side. open-source has a really bright future

🤯Kimi K3 mogs GPT-5.6 Sol on frontend design The features are similar but Kimi has much better taste and 3D capabilities. The design overall is also way better and more elegant on Kimi's side. open-source has a really bright future

filipe

137,563 次观看 • 1 个月前

Meet Kimi K3

Meet Kimi K3

Kimi.ai

10,403,453 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is really really good.

This is really really good.

Troy Westwood

247,906 次观看 • 2 年前

Kimi K3 is CRAZY at frontend used about 3 vague prompts to create this site in Kimi Code

Kimi K3 is CRAZY at frontend used about 3 vague prompts to create this site in Kimi Code

Leon Lin

37,886 次观看 • 1 个月前

Qwen 3.8 Preview is quietly catching Kimi K3 on frontend + game design.And this is just the preview. Full 3.8 is going to be a beast. We tested Qwen 3.8 Preview against Kimi K3 on 3D modeling and animation. Ran both through the same 3 prompts. Both on Max effort. Qwen 3.8 Preview was dramatically faster across the board, 3-4x quicker on every test. Kimi K3 needed 2 hours on the final scene; Qwen wrapped it in 31 minutes. Test 1 (Engine Sim) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 25min Kimi K3: 1hr 30min Test 2 (Voxel Dino Printer) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 8min Kimi K3: 45min Test 3 (Garden Scene) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 31min Kimi K3: 2hrs

Qwen 3.8 Preview is quietly catching Kimi K3 on frontend + game design.And this is just the preview. Full 3.8 is going to be a beast. We tested Qwen 3.8 Preview against Kimi K3 on 3D modeling and animation. Ran both through the same 3 prompts. Both on Max effort. Qwen 3.8 Preview was dramatically faster across the board, 3-4x quicker on every test. Kimi K3 needed 2 hours on the final scene; Qwen wrapped it in 31 minutes. Test 1 (Engine Sim) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 25min Kimi K3: 1hr 30min Test 2 (Voxel Dino Printer) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 8min Kimi K3: 45min Test 3 (Garden Scene) Qwen 3.8 Preview: 31min Kimi K3: 2hrs

GMI Cloud

25,513 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,237 次观看 • 1 个月前

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

Hamza

258,630 次观看 • 1 个月前

Why is J.J. Watt getting really, really good, really fast on CBS

Why is J.J. Watt getting really, really good, really fast on CBS

Andrew Marchand

37,023 次观看 • 9 个月前

It worked!! Kimi k3 Oauth is now wired directly into codex. The Kimi k3 model is insane but their app is not. So I figure a better way to use k3 by hooking my sub straight into codex instead. K3 now sits in the model picker next to Sol 5.6. Same subscription i was already paying for, no api key, just have to do OAuth in Kimi Code. Links down below 👇

It worked!! Kimi k3 Oauth is now wired directly into codex. The Kimi k3 model is insane but their app is not. So I figure a better way to use k3 by hooking my sub straight into codex instead. K3 now sits in the model picker next to Sol 5.6. Same subscription i was already paying for, no api key, just have to do OAuth in Kimi Code. Links down below 👇

Ziwen

274,865 次观看 • 1 个月前

Dupli-Kate is really good at fighting and really good at dying.

Dupli-Kate is really good at fighting and really good at dying.

Invincible VS

48,557 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ohnepixel on Deadlock: "That game is actually good. That game is still really, really good"

Ohnepixel on Deadlock: "That game is actually good. That game is still really, really good"

Deadlock Intel

98,033 次观看 • 29 天前

Just tested Kimi.ai K3 against GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 on the same task: build a Subway Surfers game. Kimi K3 was my favorite. Better UI, smoother gameplay, and the overall experience felt more polished. GPT-5.6 was solid too, while Grok 4.5 fell behind on the UI. The interesting part is that all three needed at least one follow-up prompt. Kimi also took a bit longer to generate, but the extra time paid off. Ran Kimi K3 through Nebius Token Factory. Low inference cost + a really capable open source model is a great combo.

Just tested Kimi.ai K3 against GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 on the same task: build a Subway Surfers game. Kimi K3 was my favorite. Better UI, smoother gameplay, and the overall experience felt more polished. GPT-5.6 was solid too, while Grok 4.5 fell behind on the UI. The interesting part is that all three needed at least one follow-up prompt. Kimi also took a bit longer to generate, but the extra time paid off. Ran Kimi K3 through Nebius Token Factory. Low inference cost + a really capable open source model is a great combo.

Arindam Majumder 𝕏

46,107 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable vs Kimi K3 in Tetris Fable wins

Fable vs Kimi K3 in Tetris Fable wins

Wall St Engine

46,568 次观看 • 1 个月前

In case you forgot, Erling Haaland is really, really, really good at scoring goals.

In case you forgot, Erling Haaland is really, really, really good at scoring goals.

NBC Sports Soccer

281,596 次观看 • 1 年前