Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Learn about Harnesses! I went over all these - omp - pi - claude code - zcode - codex - warp This is what I am using everyday, I explain the difference and benefits of each.

92,814 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 32

Фото профиля 0xSero
0xSero1 месяц назад

On Youtube also

Фото профиля Swonk
Swonk1 месяц назад

Pi isn't comparable to others imo wins by a large margin

Фото профиля ✦ Justin Brock ✦
✦ Justin Brock ✦1 месяц назад

Add Hermes!

Фото профиля Pierre L
Pierre L1 месяц назад

No more droid ?

Фото профиля Ø¥ĀMÄ
Ø¥ĀMÄ1 месяц назад

No hermes harness?

Фото профиля Coconut
Coconut1 месяц назад

No Hermes?

Фото профиля Kareem
Kareem1 месяц назад

Try by @1jehuang

Фото профиля Maaz
Maaz1 месяц назад

bro this is exactly why i don’t think there’ll be one “best” harness 😭 you end up using codex for one thing, claude code for another, omp/pi for something else… and then somehow you have 8 agents running across 5 terminals. we’re basically building @aoagents for that mess. use whatever harness you want, AO just gives you one place to run and keep track of all of them.

Фото профиля Shawn McAllister
Shawn McAllister1 месяц назад

jcode is another rust option

Фото профиля Artem
Artem1 месяц назад

Six harnesses. Still one question. What can the chosen one touch without asking.

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide1 месяц назад

Which harness wins for you?

Фото профиля Daniel Carneiro
Daniel Carneiro1 месяц назад

Have you used @opencrabs ?

Фото профиля maddada • ghostex.dev
maddada • ghostex.dev1 месяц назад

You have to give Ghostex a try again my friend, been working very hard on it and it's really good now. Recently added Agent CLI "Chat Views" and an Extensions system. Also made the app much lighter and faster (It's now GPUI & Rust based instead of swift/appkit). Android & iOS apps rebuilt from scratch too. Please let me know what you think!

Фото профиля AbraTabia
AbraTabia1 месяц назад

The thing that surprised me most moving between harnesses is how much of the quality gap is the system prompt and the tool descriptions, not the model. Same model, two harnesses, very different tool call accuracy. Which one has felt most steerable to you?

Фото профиля Bokiko
Bokiko1 месяц назад

Hey @grok tldr this video plz

Фото профиля riVeN
riVeN1 месяц назад

The only harness difference that survives a month is how it handles context compaction and what it can touch unasked.

Фото профиля Dan Repaci
Dan Repaci1 месяц назад

Decompile codex app lol

Фото профиля otter
otter1 месяц назад

I'm trying out Codegraff and JCode

Фото профиля 🇯🇵 human touched 🇯🇵
🇯🇵 human touched 🇯🇵1 месяц назад

timely, thank you! 🙏🏽🤗 (cc-ing @itsbeaudean too)

Фото профиля Vijay
Vijay1 месяц назад

Add amp and devin too

Фото профиля Asogan Moodaly
Asogan Moodaly1 месяц назад

Hermes?

Фото профиля Aqua's Chaos Belle
Aqua's Chaos Belle1 месяц назад

You look older than I expected

Фото профиля Swival.dev
Swival.dev1 месяц назад

Swival?

Фото профиля Fraser Price
Fraser Price1 месяц назад

Hi which of these are written in bash

Фото профиля Marcelo Retana
Marcelo Retana1 месяц назад

One can use Claude Code models on other harnesses with a subscription or only via api?

Фото профиля Caleb
Caleb1 месяц назад

Keep the great content coming OxSero!

Фото профиля GWΞI LO 🐸
GWΞI LO 🐸1 месяц назад

it often shocks me how disgustingly unproductive omp vibe mode can be with the wrong model

Фото профиля framp
framp1 месяц назад

This is great! Btw you can have subagents (and goals) with pi extensions

Фото профиля Shikhar
Shikhar1 месяц назад

Nice I need to watch

Фото профиля Andreas Parusel
Andreas Parusel1 месяц назад

This was really interesting. Thanks for sharing your workflows!

Фото профиля Sophia Data Queen
Sophia Data Queen1 месяц назад

The model list is noisy. The harness list is the actual stack.

Фото профиля Nokia04
Nokia041 месяц назад

harness diffs matter more than model diffs lately.

Похожие видео