正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇨🇳 Satellite images from a Shanghai shipyard may show China testing a new class of nuclear-powered attack submarine... The vessel appears longer than existing Type 093 boats and features a notably smaller sail, a design change that could improve underwater speed, maneuverability, and acoustic performance. X-form stern surfaces, usually...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,813,299 subscribers

47,029 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA’S NEXT NUCLEAR ATTACK SUBMARINE EMERGES WITH NEW STEALTH DESIGN China is building a next-generation nuclear-powered attack submarine with a shrouded pump-jet, an X-shaped stern and a hull estimated at roughly 120 meters. The vessel was photographed at Bohai Shipyard in Huludao and is widely described by outside analysts as the Type 095. Beijing has not confirmed the designation, and analysts are still debating whether the latest imagery shows the submarine first observed in February or a newer variant. The design focuses on one of the hardest problems in undersea warfare: keeping a nuclear submarine quiet while it moves at speed. 🔸 A shrouded pump-jet replaces the traditional exposed propeller. By enclosing its rotating components, the system can reduce underwater noise and improve propulsion efficiency, particularly at higher submerged speeds. An improved Type 093 variant is already believed to use a pump-jet, but the new submarine combines it with a more extensively redesigned hull. 🔸 The stern uses an X-shaped control arrangement. It is the first known Chinese nuclear-powered attack submarine with this configuration. Compared with the cruciform sterns used on earlier Chinese boats, the X-tail can improve maneuverability, control and safety while reducing noise under some operating conditions. 🔸 The vessel appears considerably larger than its predecessors. Analysis of commercial imagery puts its length at roughly 120 meters. The additional hull volume could accommodate more sensors, weapons, crew space or machinery, although its internal arrangement remains unknown. 🔸 Two large circular openings are visible ahead of the sail. Their purpose has not been established. They may be connected to weapons or sonar systems, but comparisons with the large payload tubes carried by U.S. Virginia-class submarines remain speculative. The submarine has not entered service, and satellite imagery cannot establish how quiet it will be, what weapons it will carry or which precise variant is under construction. But its pump-jet, X-tail and larger hull show where China is concentrating its efforts. If the design delivers the intended acoustic gains, the U.S. Navy will face a harder tracking problem in the Western Pacific. The submarine could also give Chinese carrier groups a quieter and more survivable undersea escort. Do you think the Type 095 will force the U.S. Navy to rethink its operations in the Pacific?
0:20

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA’S NEXT NUCLEAR ATTACK SUBMARINE EMERGES WITH NEW STEALTH DESIGN China is building a next-generation nuclear-powered attack submarine with a shrouded pump-jet, an X-shaped stern and a hull estimated at roughly 120 meters. The vessel was photographed at Bohai Shipyard in Huludao and is widely described by outside analysts as the Type 095. Beijing has not confirmed the designation, and analysts are still debating whether the latest imagery shows the submarine first observed in February or a newer variant. The design focuses on one of the hardest problems in undersea warfare: keeping a nuclear submarine quiet while it moves at speed. 🔸 A shrouded pump-jet replaces the traditional exposed propeller. By enclosing its rotating components, the system can reduce underwater noise and improve propulsion efficiency, particularly at higher submerged speeds. An improved Type 093 variant is already believed to use a pump-jet, but the new submarine combines it with a more extensively redesigned hull. 🔸 The stern uses an X-shaped control arrangement. It is the first known Chinese nuclear-powered attack submarine with this configuration. Compared with the cruciform sterns used on earlier Chinese boats, the X-tail can improve maneuverability, control and safety while reducing noise under some operating conditions. 🔸 The vessel appears considerably larger than its predecessors. Analysis of commercial imagery puts its length at roughly 120 meters. The additional hull volume could accommodate more sensors, weapons, crew space or machinery, although its internal arrangement remains unknown. 🔸 Two large circular openings are visible ahead of the sail. Their purpose has not been established. They may be connected to weapons or sonar systems, but comparisons with the large payload tubes carried by U.S. Virginia-class submarines remain speculative. The submarine has not entered service, and satellite imagery cannot establish how quiet it will be, what weapons it will carry or which precise variant is under construction. But its pump-jet, X-tail and larger hull show where China is concentrating its efforts. If the design delivers the intended acoustic gains, the U.S. Navy will face a harder tracking problem in the Western Pacific. The submarine could also give Chinese carrier groups a quieter and more survivable undersea escort. Do you think the Type 095 will force the U.S. Navy to rethink its operations in the Pacific?

NewRulesGeopolitics

25,520 次观看 • 11 天前

Japan Will Have to Rely on Its revolutionary Lithium Submarines Against China’s New Type 95 Nuclear Submarine China is expected to commission its first Type 95 nuclear-powered attack submarine in the coming weeks, a 7,000-8,000t vessel whose details remain largely estimates. By steadily refining Russian-derived technology, the Chinese are seeking to approach the performance level of the U.S. Virginia class. The Type 95 features modern technologies such as a pump-jet propulsor, advanced sensors, and numerous improvements over the earlier Type 093B. It is believed to achieve sustained speeds of around +25 knots. On the Japanese side stands the revolutionary Taigei class: diesel-electric submarines equipped with lithium-ion batteries that can remain submerged for up to three weeks and recharge in just a few hours. The latest units have incorporated upgrades including quieter snorkel systems, enhanced sensors, and improved battery performance. Can the 3,000-ton Taigei submarines deter the Type 095, which displaces more than twice as much? Both the Sea of Japan and the East/South China Seas feature extensive deep-water areas that strongly favor a nuclear submarine’s ability to maintain high constant speeds. Yet the Taigei would not be easy prey: its high-speed sprints nearly match the Chinese submarine’s cruising speed. Multiple Taigei boats would likely attempt to ambush a Type 95 if it ventured into shallower waters near Japan. Japanese electric submarines remain extremely quiet even at speeds above 10 knots for several days, setting the stage for a true underwater hunt. The Type 95 is expected to introduce new Chinese technologies specifically aimed at detecting very quiet submarines. In the coming years, the Type 95 fleet will gradually grow, but it will eventually face the Taigei’s successor, expected to feature solid-state batteries, higher speeds, submerged endurance approaching 60 days, and recharging times measured in minutes. Anticipating this, China is investing in the Type 041, which reportedly incorporates a compact micro-nuclear reactor and Lithium batteries, offering characteristics similar to the advanced Japanese submarines but with unlimited submerged endurance and greater speed. This is a head-to-head technological race between two major powers.
0:39

Japan Will Have to Rely on Its revolutionary Lithium Submarines Against China’s New Type 95 Nuclear Submarine China is expected to commission its first Type 95 nuclear-powered attack submarine in the coming weeks, a 7,000-8,000t vessel whose details remain largely estimates. By steadily refining Russian-derived technology, the Chinese are seeking to approach the performance level of the U.S. Virginia class. The Type 95 features modern technologies such as a pump-jet propulsor, advanced sensors, and numerous improvements over the earlier Type 093B. It is believed to achieve sustained speeds of around +25 knots. On the Japanese side stands the revolutionary Taigei class: diesel-electric submarines equipped with lithium-ion batteries that can remain submerged for up to three weeks and recharge in just a few hours. The latest units have incorporated upgrades including quieter snorkel systems, enhanced sensors, and improved battery performance. Can the 3,000-ton Taigei submarines deter the Type 095, which displaces more than twice as much? Both the Sea of Japan and the East/South China Seas feature extensive deep-water areas that strongly favor a nuclear submarine’s ability to maintain high constant speeds. Yet the Taigei would not be easy prey: its high-speed sprints nearly match the Chinese submarine’s cruising speed. Multiple Taigei boats would likely attempt to ambush a Type 95 if it ventured into shallower waters near Japan. Japanese electric submarines remain extremely quiet even at speeds above 10 knots for several days, setting the stage for a true underwater hunt. The Type 95 is expected to introduce new Chinese technologies specifically aimed at detecting very quiet submarines. In the coming years, the Type 95 fleet will gradually grow, but it will eventually face the Taigei’s successor, expected to feature solid-state batteries, higher speeds, submerged endurance approaching 60 days, and recharging times measured in minutes. Anticipating this, China is investing in the Type 041, which reportedly incorporates a compact micro-nuclear reactor and Lithium batteries, offering characteristics similar to the advanced Japanese submarines but with unlimited submerged endurance and greater speed. This is a head-to-head technological race between two major powers.

Patricia Marins

21,575 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN SHOCK: RUSSIA BUILDS EVEN QUIETER SUCCESSOR TO ITS ‘BLACK HOLE’ SUBMARINES Russia is expanding its Lada-class submarine fleet with a design intended to improve on the stealth of the Kilo boats nicknamed “Black Holes.” The latest submarine, Maloyaroslavets, was laid down at Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg on August 27. 🔸 Reduced noise and improved acoustic protection make the Lada harder to detect. Its designer, Rubin, has described the class as even quieter than its predecessors, calling it “blacker than a black hole.” 🔸 An improved sonar suite strengthens the other side of the equation: detecting an opponent. Combined with lower noise, this could help the submarine locate and track enemy vessels before they establish contact with it. 🔸 The smaller design uses extensive automation and requires a crew of around 35. The Lada packs reconnaissance, submarine hunting, attacks on surface ships and minelaying into a compact platform. 🔸 Six 533 mm torpedo tubes accommodate torpedoes, mines and Kalibr cruise missiles. The missile capability extends its reach to targets on land, giving a concealed submarine several ways to threaten an opposing force. 🔸 Published specifications include a submerged speed of 21 knots, a diving depth of 300 meters and endurance of up to 45 days at sea. 🔸 Serial boats incorporate changes developed through trials of the lead vessel, Sankt-Peterburg. The redesigned Kronshtadt joined the fleet in 2024, followed by Velikiye Luki in 2025. Three further boats are now under construction. A growing Lada fleet would give Russia more quiet platforms for patrolling maritime approaches, tracking hostile vessels and launching strikes. For NATO, the challenge begins well before a weapon is fired: finding a small submarine, maintaining contact and preventing it from choosing the moment of attack. Can NATO detect Russia’s new Lada submarines before they get close enough to strike?
0:24

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN SHOCK: RUSSIA BUILDS EVEN QUIETER SUCCESSOR TO ITS ‘BLACK HOLE’ SUBMARINES Russia is expanding its Lada-class submarine fleet with a design intended to improve on the stealth of the Kilo boats nicknamed “Black Holes.” The latest submarine, Maloyaroslavets, was laid down at Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg on August 27. 🔸 Reduced noise and improved acoustic protection make the Lada harder to detect. Its designer, Rubin, has described the class as even quieter than its predecessors, calling it “blacker than a black hole.” 🔸 An improved sonar suite strengthens the other side of the equation: detecting an opponent. Combined with lower noise, this could help the submarine locate and track enemy vessels before they establish contact with it. 🔸 The smaller design uses extensive automation and requires a crew of around 35. The Lada packs reconnaissance, submarine hunting, attacks on surface ships and minelaying into a compact platform. 🔸 Six 533 mm torpedo tubes accommodate torpedoes, mines and Kalibr cruise missiles. The missile capability extends its reach to targets on land, giving a concealed submarine several ways to threaten an opposing force. 🔸 Published specifications include a submerged speed of 21 knots, a diving depth of 300 meters and endurance of up to 45 days at sea. 🔸 Serial boats incorporate changes developed through trials of the lead vessel, Sankt-Peterburg. The redesigned Kronshtadt joined the fleet in 2024, followed by Velikiye Luki in 2025. Three further boats are now under construction. A growing Lada fleet would give Russia more quiet platforms for patrolling maritime approaches, tracking hostile vessels and launching strikes. For NATO, the challenge begins well before a weapon is fired: finding a small submarine, maintaining contact and preventing it from choosing the moment of attack. Can NATO detect Russia’s new Lada submarines before they get close enough to strike?

NewRulesGeopolitics

12,900 次观看 • 27 天前

Why I say Japanese submarines are so dangerous and quieter than many nuclear submarines Conventional diesel-electric submarines are normally quieter than nuclear ones only at very low speeds, typically up to around 2-7 knots. Above that speed they quickly become noisy, while modern nuclear submarines can maintain excellent stealth up to about 20 knots. The British Astute-class, the Virginia Class and probably the French Suffren-class are said to remain among the quietest submarines in the world even at speeds close to 22-25 knots, behind only of the super quieter SeaWolf. So what does this have to do with Japanese submarines? The latest Japanese Subs represent such a leap in technology that they can stay extremely quiet up to 15 knots or more, a figure that gets remarkably close to modern nuclear submarines and is clearly superior to older nuclear classes. On top of that, these Japanese submarines are equipped with AIP and advanced lithium-ion batteries in the Taigei-class, allowing them to remain submerged for 15–20 days at low speed. When solid-state batteries enter service in the next generation, that endurance will practically double and this is scheduled to happen before 2030. Imagine how many daily patrols an adversary would need to track something that can disappear for weeks and need only few hours to recharge on surface. In regional scenarios (Indo-Pacific, East China Sea, Taiwan Strait), the Japanese strategy is perfectly suited, and maintenance costs are far lower than those of nuclear submarines. It is no coincidence that Israel has become a customer and ordered several of these boats. Submarines are a state of art for Japanese.
0:26

Why I say Japanese submarines are so dangerous and quieter than many nuclear submarines Conventional diesel-electric submarines are normally quieter than nuclear ones only at very low speeds, typically up to around 2-7 knots. Above that speed they quickly become noisy, while modern nuclear submarines can maintain excellent stealth up to about 20 knots. The British Astute-class, the Virginia Class and probably the French Suffren-class are said to remain among the quietest submarines in the world even at speeds close to 22-25 knots, behind only of the super quieter SeaWolf. So what does this have to do with Japanese submarines? The latest Japanese Subs represent such a leap in technology that they can stay extremely quiet up to 15 knots or more, a figure that gets remarkably close to modern nuclear submarines and is clearly superior to older nuclear classes. On top of that, these Japanese submarines are equipped with AIP and advanced lithium-ion batteries in the Taigei-class, allowing them to remain submerged for 15–20 days at low speed. When solid-state batteries enter service in the next generation, that endurance will practically double and this is scheduled to happen before 2030. Imagine how many daily patrols an adversary would need to track something that can disappear for weeks and need only few hours to recharge on surface. In regional scenarios (Indo-Pacific, East China Sea, Taiwan Strait), the Japanese strategy is perfectly suited, and maintenance costs are far lower than those of nuclear submarines. It is no coincidence that Israel has become a customer and ordered several of these boats. Submarines are a state of art for Japanese.

Patricia Marins

1,449,473 次观看 • 10 个月前

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.
0:23

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

NSTRIKE

57,243 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 China is building a MASSIVE 669-foot ship whose only job appears to be launching and recovering giant underwater drones Satellite images from Vantor reportedly show the vessel taking shape in Shanghai since April, now painted navy gray, with a well deck at the stern sized around a 164-foot semi-submersible cradle, twelve struts on the superstructure that could lower payloads straight through the bottom of the hull, and a boxy enclosed design that keeps anyone from seeing what goes in or out. Analysts believe it services China's extra-large submarine drones, which have outgrown the floating docks in Hainan where the prototypes are tested, one dock per drone. Those drones are built for surveillance, mine-laying, special operations and attacking ships, and a mothership lets them work for weeks nowhere near a Chinese port. America is currently perfecting laser systems on the Texas border to shoot cheap drones out of the sky, which is the right answer to the last war. Underwater has no equivalent, because you cannot laser something running silent at depth, and the cables carrying the world's internet and money sit unguarded on the seabed. Beijing is building the tool for a fight Washington has not started training for. Source: The War Zone, Vantor / Writer: Daniel
3:16

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 China is building a MASSIVE 669-foot ship whose only job appears to be launching and recovering giant underwater drones Satellite images from Vantor reportedly show the vessel taking shape in Shanghai since April, now painted navy gray, with a well deck at the stern sized around a 164-foot semi-submersible cradle, twelve struts on the superstructure that could lower payloads straight through the bottom of the hull, and a boxy enclosed design that keeps anyone from seeing what goes in or out. Analysts believe it services China's extra-large submarine drones, which have outgrown the floating docks in Hainan where the prototypes are tested, one dock per drone. Those drones are built for surveillance, mine-laying, special operations and attacking ships, and a mothership lets them work for weeks nowhere near a Chinese port. America is currently perfecting laser systems on the Texas border to shoot cheap drones out of the sky, which is the right answer to the last war. Underwater has no equivalent, because you cannot laser something running silent at depth, and the cables carrying the world's internet and money sit unguarded on the seabed. Beijing is building the tool for a fight Washington has not started training for. Source: The War Zone, Vantor / Writer: Daniel

Mario Nawfal

51,898 次观看 • 10 天前

‼️🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. General Says China Is Now a True Military Peer and Preparing for Conflict U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Commandant Lt. Gen. Sklenka stated that China is no longer a near peer competitor but has reached parity with the United States across multiple domains. Speaking at the Modern Day Marine Expo 2026, he stressed that the U.S. must reassess how it views China’s growing capabilities. According to him: • China’s shipbuilding capacity is about 230 times larger than that of the United States • Its nuclear arsenal is expanding at a rapid pace • It is developing advanced warfare systems using AI and drone swarms • Future conflicts could begin with cyberattacks and infrastructure disruption before kinetic strikes He noted that if Iran could pressure U.S. forces in the Middle East, a potential conflict with China would be significantly more destructive. He also emphasized that U.S. bases can no longer be assumed secure, stating that forces may have to defend them while conducting operations.
0:21

‼️🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. General Says China Is Now a True Military Peer and Preparing for Conflict U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Commandant Lt. Gen. Sklenka stated that China is no longer a near peer competitor but has reached parity with the United States across multiple domains. Speaking at the Modern Day Marine Expo 2026, he stressed that the U.S. must reassess how it views China’s growing capabilities. According to him: • China’s shipbuilding capacity is about 230 times larger than that of the United States • Its nuclear arsenal is expanding at a rapid pace • It is developing advanced warfare systems using AI and drone swarms • Future conflicts could begin with cyberattacks and infrastructure disruption before kinetic strikes He noted that if Iran could pressure U.S. forces in the Middle East, a potential conflict with China would be significantly more destructive. He also emphasized that U.S. bases can no longer be assumed secure, stating that forces may have to defend them while conducting operations.

Defense Intelligence

20,755 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,998,688 次观看 • 3 年前

☢️ Russian propaganda is once again threatening Britain with a “radioactive tsunami” from Poseidon On air, propagandists claimed the Russian underwater drone can travel at depths of up to 1 kilometer at speeds of around 185 km/h, and that using it near Britain could create a “radioactive tsunami more than 100 meters high” that would “plunge the country into the abyss.” The comparison was especially impressive: they claimed the fastest American missiles travel at just 100 km/h — apparently, in this version of physics, missiles have also switched to submarine mode. Russia does indeed present Poseidon as a nuclear-powered underwater drone with virtually unlimited range. But claims about a guaranteed 100-meter radioactive wave wiping out Britain belong more to the usual Russian TV genre: nuclear physics mixed with apocalypse for prime time. When ordinary nuclear threats are no longer enough, you add special effects.
1:08

☢️ Russian propaganda is once again threatening Britain with a “radioactive tsunami” from Poseidon On air, propagandists claimed the Russian underwater drone can travel at depths of up to 1 kilometer at speeds of around 185 km/h, and that using it near Britain could create a “radioactive tsunami more than 100 meters high” that would “plunge the country into the abyss.” The comparison was especially impressive: they claimed the fastest American missiles travel at just 100 km/h — apparently, in this version of physics, missiles have also switched to submarine mode. Russia does indeed present Poseidon as a nuclear-powered underwater drone with virtually unlimited range. But claims about a guaranteed 100-meter radioactive wave wiping out Britain belong more to the usual Russian TV genre: nuclear physics mixed with apocalypse for prime time. When ordinary nuclear threats are no longer enough, you add special effects.

NEXTA

43,468 次观看 • 27 天前

‼️🇨🇳 China has started construction of its fourth Type 004 aircraft carrier, which will become the first nuclear-powered surface combatant of the PRC. According to reports, the new aircraft carrier with a displacement of 110-120 thousand tons is being built at a shipyard in Dalian and is designed as a direct competitor to the American Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers. Unlike previous Chinese ships, the Type 004 will combine a nuclear power plant (based on Longwei reactors) with electromagnetic catapults and a full-size deck, providing virtually unlimited sailing range. The Type 004 is expected to carry an air group of more than 90 aircraft, including 24-30 J-15T fighters and more than 20 fifth-generation J-35 aircraft, as well as KJ-600 AWACS planes and unmanned aerial vehicles. Thus, all this significantly exceeds the capabilities of previous Chinese aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian), which are limited either by the absence of catapults or equipped with conventional power plants. The PLA Navy also plans that the Type 004, accompanied by the latest Type 055A/B destroyers and Type 095 submarines, will be able to project power far beyond China's coastal waters, creating a threat to the strategic superiority of the United States on the world’s oceans. Photo: render of the new aircraft carrier. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:53

‼️🇨🇳 China has started construction of its fourth Type 004 aircraft carrier, which will become the first nuclear-powered surface combatant of the PRC. According to reports, the new aircraft carrier with a displacement of 110-120 thousand tons is being built at a shipyard in Dalian and is designed as a direct competitor to the American Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers. Unlike previous Chinese ships, the Type 004 will combine a nuclear power plant (based on Longwei reactors) with electromagnetic catapults and a full-size deck, providing virtually unlimited sailing range. The Type 004 is expected to carry an air group of more than 90 aircraft, including 24-30 J-15T fighters and more than 20 fifth-generation J-35 aircraft, as well as KJ-600 AWACS planes and unmanned aerial vehicles. Thus, all this significantly exceeds the capabilities of previous Chinese aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian), which are limited either by the absence of catapults or equipped with conventional power plants. The PLA Navy also plans that the Type 004, accompanied by the latest Type 055A/B destroyers and Type 095 submarines, will be able to project power far beyond China's coastal waters, creating a threat to the strategic superiority of the United States on the world’s oceans. Photo: render of the new aircraft carrier. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

380,391 次观看 • 1 年前

⚡️PUTIN: WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN CASE OF AGGRESSION AGAINST RUSSIA AND BELARUS⚡️ Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed significant updates to Russia’s nuclear strategy, citing the rapidly evolving global military-political situation. These changes reflect the Kremlin's concerns about increasing tensions and shifting alliances in international security. Putin emphasized the need to adapt Russia’s nuclear strategy to current conditions, stating, "The current military-political situation is changing dynamically in the world, and we must take this into account." His comments signal a potential recalibration of Russia’s approach to nuclear deterrence. A key component of the proposed updates includes redefining the conditions under which Russia might resort to using nuclear weapons. According to Putin, "A number of clarifications have been proposed regarding the conditions under which nuclear weapons may be used." This suggests that the Russian military may be considering a broader range of scenarios where nuclear options could be on the table. Putin outlined a new provision that would expand the definition of aggression against Russia. He stated, "Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation." This shift implies that any non-nuclear nation involved in hostilities with Russia, backed by a nuclear-armed country, could trigger a nuclear response from Moscow. Furthermore, Putin reiterated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in defense of not only its own territory but also that of Belarus, a close ally. "We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus," Putin declared, underscoring the deepening military ties between the two nations. The proposed changes highlight Russia’s growing concern over the security threats posed by NATO and other Western-aligned countries, as well as potential regional conflicts that could involve nuclear powers.
2:12

⚡️PUTIN: WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN CASE OF AGGRESSION AGAINST RUSSIA AND BELARUS⚡️ Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed significant updates to Russia’s nuclear strategy, citing the rapidly evolving global military-political situation. These changes reflect the Kremlin's concerns about increasing tensions and shifting alliances in international security. Putin emphasized the need to adapt Russia’s nuclear strategy to current conditions, stating, "The current military-political situation is changing dynamically in the world, and we must take this into account." His comments signal a potential recalibration of Russia’s approach to nuclear deterrence. A key component of the proposed updates includes redefining the conditions under which Russia might resort to using nuclear weapons. According to Putin, "A number of clarifications have been proposed regarding the conditions under which nuclear weapons may be used." This suggests that the Russian military may be considering a broader range of scenarios where nuclear options could be on the table. Putin outlined a new provision that would expand the definition of aggression against Russia. He stated, "Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation." This shift implies that any non-nuclear nation involved in hostilities with Russia, backed by a nuclear-armed country, could trigger a nuclear response from Moscow. Furthermore, Putin reiterated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in defense of not only its own territory but also that of Belarus, a close ally. "We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus," Putin declared, underscoring the deepening military ties between the two nations. The proposed changes highlight Russia’s growing concern over the security threats posed by NATO and other Western-aligned countries, as well as potential regional conflicts that could involve nuclear powers.

Russian Market

187,993 次观看 • 2 年前

🇺🇸🇨🇳 America wants reactors on cargo ships again. MARAD signed a deal with Core Power to open a path for U.S.-flagged nuclear merchant ships, so construction could start in 2028. That date is a target, but the lure is obvious: Today’s boxships haul thousands of tons of bunker fuel just to crawl across an ocean. Swap the tanks for a reactor and you get years of range, extra cargo space, and a ship that does not have to sip diesel like a miser. The catch is just as obvious: One design in play is a molten-salt reactor that has never gone critical anywhere. Idaho is prepping a short test around 2028. A lab experiment is not a propulsion plant in a North Atlantic storm, but the fallback is older and faster: drop a light-water SMR into a hull built in Japan or Korea, then do the nuclear work in a U.S. yard that still has to be built. This has been done before though, NS Savannah put to sea in 1962. The reactor worked, but the business did not. Cheap oil, extra crew costs, and ports that did not want the ship killed it by 1971. Germany and Japan hit the same wall, and almost every civilian nuclear freighter ended as a beautiful dead end. So why touch it now? China already builds the world’s ships and is pushing nuclear cargo of its own. If this works, America gets vessels that do not beg the fuel market for permission to move. If it fails, it will fail in the boring places: insurance, port access, licensing, and a $700 million ship trying to beat a $250 million diesel workhorse. Source: Interesting Engineering YT / Writer: Val
9:32

🇺🇸🇨🇳 America wants reactors on cargo ships again. MARAD signed a deal with Core Power to open a path for U.S.-flagged nuclear merchant ships, so construction could start in 2028. That date is a target, but the lure is obvious: Today’s boxships haul thousands of tons of bunker fuel just to crawl across an ocean. Swap the tanks for a reactor and you get years of range, extra cargo space, and a ship that does not have to sip diesel like a miser. The catch is just as obvious: One design in play is a molten-salt reactor that has never gone critical anywhere. Idaho is prepping a short test around 2028. A lab experiment is not a propulsion plant in a North Atlantic storm, but the fallback is older and faster: drop a light-water SMR into a hull built in Japan or Korea, then do the nuclear work in a U.S. yard that still has to be built. This has been done before though, NS Savannah put to sea in 1962. The reactor worked, but the business did not. Cheap oil, extra crew costs, and ports that did not want the ship killed it by 1971. Germany and Japan hit the same wall, and almost every civilian nuclear freighter ended as a beautiful dead end. So why touch it now? China already builds the world’s ships and is pushing nuclear cargo of its own. If this works, America gets vessels that do not beg the fuel market for permission to move. If it fails, it will fail in the boring places: insurance, port access, licensing, and a $700 million ship trying to beat a $250 million diesel workhorse. Source: Interesting Engineering YT / Writer: Val

Mario Nawfal

50,651 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA ADVANCES SECOND SIXTH-GENERATION FIGHTER BUILT FOR SCALE China is pushing its second sixth-generation fighter deeper into flight testing, and its greatest advantage may be its ability to be fielded in large numbers. The twin-engine tailless aircraft developed by Shenyang, widely known by the unofficial designation J-50, has now been filmed operating at both low and high altitudes. It is roughly comparable in size to the J-20 and significantly smaller than China’s other next-generation prototype developed by Chengdu. 🔸 A smaller airframe is expected to make the Shenyang fighter considerably cheaper to produce and maintain than the much larger Chengdu design. That could make sixth-generation capabilities practical across far more frontline units. 🔸 Cost may prove as important as performance. Overruns on the F-22 and F-35 prevented the United States from replacing its older fighters as widely as planned, while the J-20’s cost-effectiveness has allowed China to procure it on a much larger scale. 🔸 The new fighter could provide a one-for-one replacement for older Chinese heavyweight aircraft such as the J-11B and Su-30MKK during the 2030s, rapidly transforming the composition of the PLA’s combat fleet. 🔸 The Shenyang and Chengdu prototypes are the only publicly observed tailless fighters currently in flight testing. Removing vertical tails reduces radar reflections but requires advanced software and distributed control surfaces to maintain stability and maneuverability. 🔸 Research associated with the Shenyang program has also explored flight-control technology for tailless aircraft operating from carriers. This raises the possibility that the fighter could eventually serve with both the PLA Air Force and Navy. China may therefore be building more than another elite aircraft for a limited number of squadrons. A smaller and more affordable sixth-generation fighter could be produced widely, replace existing heavyweights and potentially operate from Chinese carriers. The Pentagon would then face not a handful of experimental jets, but an entire force transitioning toward sixth-generation aircraft at scale. Could China field sixth-generation fighters on a scale the United States cannot match?
0:37

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA ADVANCES SECOND SIXTH-GENERATION FIGHTER BUILT FOR SCALE China is pushing its second sixth-generation fighter deeper into flight testing, and its greatest advantage may be its ability to be fielded in large numbers. The twin-engine tailless aircraft developed by Shenyang, widely known by the unofficial designation J-50, has now been filmed operating at both low and high altitudes. It is roughly comparable in size to the J-20 and significantly smaller than China’s other next-generation prototype developed by Chengdu. 🔸 A smaller airframe is expected to make the Shenyang fighter considerably cheaper to produce and maintain than the much larger Chengdu design. That could make sixth-generation capabilities practical across far more frontline units. 🔸 Cost may prove as important as performance. Overruns on the F-22 and F-35 prevented the United States from replacing its older fighters as widely as planned, while the J-20’s cost-effectiveness has allowed China to procure it on a much larger scale. 🔸 The new fighter could provide a one-for-one replacement for older Chinese heavyweight aircraft such as the J-11B and Su-30MKK during the 2030s, rapidly transforming the composition of the PLA’s combat fleet. 🔸 The Shenyang and Chengdu prototypes are the only publicly observed tailless fighters currently in flight testing. Removing vertical tails reduces radar reflections but requires advanced software and distributed control surfaces to maintain stability and maneuverability. 🔸 Research associated with the Shenyang program has also explored flight-control technology for tailless aircraft operating from carriers. This raises the possibility that the fighter could eventually serve with both the PLA Air Force and Navy. China may therefore be building more than another elite aircraft for a limited number of squadrons. A smaller and more affordable sixth-generation fighter could be produced widely, replace existing heavyweights and potentially operate from Chinese carriers. The Pentagon would then face not a handful of experimental jets, but an entire force transitioning toward sixth-generation aircraft at scale. Could China field sixth-generation fighters on a scale the United States cannot match?

NewRulesGeopolitics

56,312 次观看 • 23 天前

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.
0:59

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

NewRulesGeopolitics

56,483 次观看 • 4 个月前

There is a lot of confusion right now about the sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena and the role of the United States submarine in this incident. So let’s understand what most likely happened. First, the attack took place in international waters near Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. Second, the submarine involved was most likely a US nuclear powered attack submarine already operating somewhere in the Indian Ocean region. Many analysts believe it could have been operating from the broader operational area around Diego Garcia, a strategic military base used by the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. Unlike conventional submarines, nuclear submarines can stay underwater for months, because they do not need to surface for fuel. The only real limitation is food and crew endurance. So the submarine could easily remain in the region, quietly tracking naval movements. Now here is the timing part. The Iranian warship IRIS Dena had recently visited Visakhapatnam in India to participate in a multinational naval event hosted by the Indian Navy. After the exercise ended, the ship left Indian waters and began sailing west toward the Arabian Sea. If the submarine was tracking it, the most logical moment to strike would be after the ship left the exercise area and entered open international waters. That is when the torpedo strike reportedly happened near Sri Lanka. Now the next question people are asking is whether this was legal. Under the law of naval warfare, if two countries are in an armed conflict, a military vessel of the opposing side becomes a legitimate military target. Warships can be attacked even in international waters. In this case, the target was not a civilian vessel. It was a military warship of the Iranian navy. So from a naval warfare perspective, this kind of strike is generally considered permissible during active hostilities.
2:59

There is a lot of confusion right now about the sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena and the role of the United States submarine in this incident. So let’s understand what most likely happened. First, the attack took place in international waters near Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. Second, the submarine involved was most likely a US nuclear powered attack submarine already operating somewhere in the Indian Ocean region. Many analysts believe it could have been operating from the broader operational area around Diego Garcia, a strategic military base used by the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. Unlike conventional submarines, nuclear submarines can stay underwater for months, because they do not need to surface for fuel. The only real limitation is food and crew endurance. So the submarine could easily remain in the region, quietly tracking naval movements. Now here is the timing part. The Iranian warship IRIS Dena had recently visited Visakhapatnam in India to participate in a multinational naval event hosted by the Indian Navy. After the exercise ended, the ship left Indian waters and began sailing west toward the Arabian Sea. If the submarine was tracking it, the most logical moment to strike would be after the ship left the exercise area and entered open international waters. That is when the torpedo strike reportedly happened near Sri Lanka. Now the next question people are asking is whether this was legal. Under the law of naval warfare, if two countries are in an armed conflict, a military vessel of the opposing side becomes a legitimate military target. Warships can be attacked even in international waters. In this case, the target was not a civilian vessel. It was a military warship of the Iranian navy. So from a naval warfare perspective, this kind of strike is generally considered permissible during active hostilities.

Praffulgarg

25,220 次观看 • 7 个月前

Japan has just rendered an entire generation of conventional submarines obsolete, and the world hasn’t fully realized it yet. With the Taigei class and its lithium-ion batteries, Tokyo already set a new benchmark: up to three weeks submerged without ever raising a snorkel. That, however, was merely the opening act. Today, Toyota and Panasonic are leading the global race in solid-state batteries, with prototypes arriving in 2027–2028, mass production after 2030, and Japan’s next submarine class will be the first to use them, either in pure battery form or as a hybrid with a small reactor for onboard recharging. This hybrid would be similar to what the Chineses are developing. The leap is staggering. A 4,000 ton conventional submarine will patrol for 40 to 60 days without surfacing, sprint well above 20 knots for hours on end, and do it all more quietly than many nuclear subs, thanks to being significantly lighter and running solely on battery power. Solid-state cells weigh roughly one-third as much, generate 40 % less heat, and eliminate half the cooling systems. The result is a faster, stealthier hull that can travel thousands of kilometers without ever breaking the surface. Those hundreds of saved tons translate directly into more powerful electric motors, extra torpedoes and missiles, cutting-edge sensors, or greater crew comfort. The same hull now carries twice the energy or twice the weapons. It means that by 2035–2040, Japan will field conventional submarines with the endurance and sprint performance of today’s 8,000-ton nuclear boats, at one-third the cost and without the political baggage of uranium.
0:25

Japan has just rendered an entire generation of conventional submarines obsolete, and the world hasn’t fully realized it yet. With the Taigei class and its lithium-ion batteries, Tokyo already set a new benchmark: up to three weeks submerged without ever raising a snorkel. That, however, was merely the opening act. Today, Toyota and Panasonic are leading the global race in solid-state batteries, with prototypes arriving in 2027–2028, mass production after 2030, and Japan’s next submarine class will be the first to use them, either in pure battery form or as a hybrid with a small reactor for onboard recharging. This hybrid would be similar to what the Chineses are developing. The leap is staggering. A 4,000 ton conventional submarine will patrol for 40 to 60 days without surfacing, sprint well above 20 knots for hours on end, and do it all more quietly than many nuclear subs, thanks to being significantly lighter and running solely on battery power. Solid-state cells weigh roughly one-third as much, generate 40 % less heat, and eliminate half the cooling systems. The result is a faster, stealthier hull that can travel thousands of kilometers without ever breaking the surface. Those hundreds of saved tons translate directly into more powerful electric motors, extra torpedoes and missiles, cutting-edge sensors, or greater crew comfort. The same hull now carries twice the energy or twice the weapons. It means that by 2035–2040, Japan will field conventional submarines with the endurance and sprint performance of today’s 8,000-ton nuclear boats, at one-third the cost and without the political baggage of uranium.

Patricia Marins

2,734,802 次观看 • 10 个月前

AUKUS: The billlion-Dollar Trap? Next week I’ll publish a deep-dive article showing how the Australians (and others) got themselves into one of the biggest defense money pits in modern history with the AUKUS SSN program: total cost estimated between US$177 billion and US$244 billion over 30–35 years, with the first nuclear-powered submarines arriving only in the early 2030s and the full fleet completed sometime in the 2050s–2060s, by which time the core technology can possibly already be obsolete. And Australia isn’t alone. India is pouring tens of billions into its own nuclear attack submarine program and risks ending up in exactly the same boat. Just a few days ago, when I wrote about the Japanese Taigei-class and lithium-ion batteries, I pointed out the real trend: within the next 5–8 years, solid-state batteries (already scaling up in China, South Korea and Japan) will allow conventional submarines of 4,500–5,500 tons to: - stay submerged for 40–60 days - recharge in just a few hours or use. - cost under US$ 800 million each - become almost impossible to detect because they never need to snorkel But that’s only the part about the conventional subs. China has already launched the first prototype of a hybrid submarine (Type 041 Zhou-class) that uses a micro nuclear reactor (10–15 MW thermal), weighing roughly 20-25% of a conventional SSN reactor, fully modular, easily replaceable, and with dramatically lower maintenance costs, whose sole job is to continuously charge a large battery bank. Result: solid State batteries, unlimited submerged endurance, 20–22 knots continuous, 30+ knot sprint, and unit cost in series production estimated at US$1–1.5 billion. At least four other countries (Russia, South Korea, Japan, and Brazil) are now openly working on very similar small nuclear-conventional designs, but only the Chinese is a real hybrid model. This is no longer a one-off prototype; it’s the announced future of submarines powered by solid batteries recharged by micro reactors. The harsh reality: by the time the last Australian AUKUS submarine is delivered (around 2060), the most advanced navies will be mass-operating cheap hybrid subs, AI-guided autonomous torpedoes, underwater drone swarms, and large nuclear-powered UUVs. Much of today’s naval doctrine, centered on a handful of ultra-expensive crewed SSNs, can look as outdated as battleships did in 1945, in just few decades. Any multi-hundred-billion-dollar defense investment today must be judged against the 2035–2045 timeline, not the 1960s playbook. Otherwise taxpayers foot the bill and the navy ends up with very expensive floating museums.
0:25

AUKUS: The billlion-Dollar Trap? Next week I’ll publish a deep-dive article showing how the Australians (and others) got themselves into one of the biggest defense money pits in modern history with the AUKUS SSN program: total cost estimated between US$177 billion and US$244 billion over 30–35 years, with the first nuclear-powered submarines arriving only in the early 2030s and the full fleet completed sometime in the 2050s–2060s, by which time the core technology can possibly already be obsolete. And Australia isn’t alone. India is pouring tens of billions into its own nuclear attack submarine program and risks ending up in exactly the same boat. Just a few days ago, when I wrote about the Japanese Taigei-class and lithium-ion batteries, I pointed out the real trend: within the next 5–8 years, solid-state batteries (already scaling up in China, South Korea and Japan) will allow conventional submarines of 4,500–5,500 tons to: - stay submerged for 40–60 days - recharge in just a few hours or use. - cost under US$ 800 million each - become almost impossible to detect because they never need to snorkel But that’s only the part about the conventional subs. China has already launched the first prototype of a hybrid submarine (Type 041 Zhou-class) that uses a micro nuclear reactor (10–15 MW thermal), weighing roughly 20-25% of a conventional SSN reactor, fully modular, easily replaceable, and with dramatically lower maintenance costs, whose sole job is to continuously charge a large battery bank. Result: solid State batteries, unlimited submerged endurance, 20–22 knots continuous, 30+ knot sprint, and unit cost in series production estimated at US$1–1.5 billion. At least four other countries (Russia, South Korea, Japan, and Brazil) are now openly working on very similar small nuclear-conventional designs, but only the Chinese is a real hybrid model. This is no longer a one-off prototype; it’s the announced future of submarines powered by solid batteries recharged by micro reactors. The harsh reality: by the time the last Australian AUKUS submarine is delivered (around 2060), the most advanced navies will be mass-operating cheap hybrid subs, AI-guided autonomous torpedoes, underwater drone swarms, and large nuclear-powered UUVs. Much of today’s naval doctrine, centered on a handful of ultra-expensive crewed SSNs, can look as outdated as battleships did in 1945, in just few decades. Any multi-hundred-billion-dollar defense investment today must be judged against the 2035–2045 timeline, not the 1960s playbook. Otherwise taxpayers foot the bill and the navy ends up with very expensive floating museums.

Patricia Marins

59,196 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,744 次观看 • 3 年前