正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and... show more

Jibril

101,760 subscribers

113,346 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.

Heather Cooper

36,110 次观看 • 1 年前

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

98,406 次观看 • 1 年前

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

FATHELA ESQ

38,486 次观看 • 7 天前

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 次观看 • 4 个月前

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

124,528 次观看 • 1 个月前

This shouldn’t look this consistent from a single image. But Magnific Seedance 2.0 pulled it off. The motion, camera feel, and scene consistency are on another level 👇

This shouldn’t look this consistent from a single image. But Magnific Seedance 2.0 pulled it off. The motion, camera feel, and scene consistency are on another level 👇

Md Naimul Kadir

43,754 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fight side by side with John Wick in a $10M scene, you just need a photo and 10mins Seedance 2.0 literally broke Hollywood

Fight side by side with John Wick in a $10M scene, you just need a photo and 10mins Seedance 2.0 literally broke Hollywood

el.cine

40,122 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,402 次观看 • 4 个月前

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

23,642 次观看 • 1 个月前

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 10. Fixing AI Artifacts with Video Editing Use the multi-reference Vid2Vid capabilities of Seedance 2.0 to fix small defects and artifacts in AI-generated shots. Take a screenshot of the video frame containing the defect, upload it to GPT Image 2, and modify the image so the defect disappears. Flawed Video + Corrected Image: Seedance 2.0 will regenerate the video without the defect. GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 are now available on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts 👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 10. Fixing AI Artifacts with Video Editing Use the multi-reference Vid2Vid capabilities of Seedance 2.0 to fix small defects and artifacts in AI-generated shots. Take a screenshot of the video frame containing the defect, upload it to GPT Image 2, and modify the image so the defect disappears. Flawed Video + Corrected Image: Seedance 2.0 will regenerate the video without the defect. GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 are now available on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts 👇

VoxelPlot

22,566 次观看 • 2 个月前

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

67,548 次观看 • 11 个月前

Mini AI video models usually come with an obvious tradeoff. You get faster generation and lower cost, but the output often starts to look compromised: weaker motion, softer details, flatter lighting, and less cinematic control. So we tested Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini side by side against Dreamina Seedance 2.0 to see how much of that tradeoff actually shows up in the final render. Officially launched by ByteDance's official product Dreamina: Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini! Delivers on-par performance with Dreamina Seedance 2.0, but at a lower cost and faster speed.

Mini AI video models usually come with an obvious tradeoff. You get faster generation and lower cost, but the output often starts to look compromised: weaker motion, softer details, flatter lighting, and less cinematic control. So we tested Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini side by side against Dreamina Seedance 2.0 to see how much of that tradeoff actually shows up in the final render. Officially launched by ByteDance's official product Dreamina: Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini! Delivers on-par performance with Dreamina Seedance 2.0, but at a lower cost and faster speed.

GitHub Projects Community

26,029 次观看 • 16 天前

Seedance 2.5 is a significant step above Seedance 2.0 in both 4K and 30s length! Following video is directly output from Seedance 2.5 just using one simple prompt. Seedance 2.5 live on Buzzy is genuinely the first AI video platform built for cinema and commercials. TRY THIS UNBELIEVABLE MODEL ON BUZZY !

Seedance 2.5 is a significant step above Seedance 2.0 in both 4K and 30s length! Following video is directly output from Seedance 2.5 just using one simple prompt. Seedance 2.5 live on Buzzy is genuinely the first AI video platform built for cinema and commercials. TRY THIS UNBELIEVABLE MODEL ON BUZZY !

Buzzy Now

2,350,690 次观看 • 12 天前

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 次观看 • 3 个月前

Seedance 2.0 and 2.0 Fast have arrived on Leonardo. Now you can take this tool and start directing every shot with more control. Here’s what creators are saying 2.0 is really good at: - Editing your videos using image and video references so you don’t have to prompt from scratch. - Controlling camera motion with precision. - Reproducing specific pans, zooms, tracking shots, etc. from video references. - Keep characters consistent from scene to scene. Any scene you can imagine is yours to create. Start creating.

Seedance 2.0 and 2.0 Fast have arrived on Leonardo. Now you can take this tool and start directing every shot with more control. Here’s what creators are saying 2.0 is really good at: - Editing your videos using image and video references so you don’t have to prompt from scratch. - Controlling camera motion with precision. - Reproducing specific pans, zooms, tracking shots, etc. from video references. - Keep characters consistent from scene to scene. Any scene you can imagine is yours to create. Start creating.

Leonardo.Ai

104,943 次观看 • 2 个月前

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 次观看 • 4 个月前

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Jerrod Lew

15,877 次观看 • 1 个月前

Image. Then motion. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 are now both live on Pollo AI. GPT Image 2 → structured layouts, sharp text, consistent characters — ready for ads, products, and social content. Seedance 2.0 → cinematic, stable, smooth video — straight from your image. From image to motion, the workflow is fast, seamless, and powerful.

Image. Then motion. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 are now both live on Pollo AI. GPT Image 2 → structured layouts, sharp text, consistent characters — ready for ads, products, and social content. Seedance 2.0 → cinematic, stable, smooth video — straight from your image. From image to motion, the workflow is fast, seamless, and powerful.

Pollo AI

431,569 次观看 • 2 个月前

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,038 次观看 • 4 个月前

Here's a movie trailer from ChatGPT Images 2.0. Create a storyboard style image with Images 2.0, and use it in Seedream 2.0 as a reference. Enter a prompt to create a 15 second video from the image. The model will use the character and environments. Quick tutorial:

Here's a movie trailer from ChatGPT Images 2.0. Create a storyboard style image with Images 2.0, and use it in Seedream 2.0 as a reference. Enter a prompt to create a 15 second video from the image. The model will use the character and environments. Quick tutorial:

Jerrod Lew

15,768 次观看 • 2 个月前