This guy built an HFT algorithm on Polymarket with an average trade size of $35.88 Result: +$470,883 His algorithm trades short-term crypto Up/Down markets. It combines directional trading and dynamic hedging, while forming complete sets with part of its inventory: 1. Finds undervalued outcomes using its own fair value... estimates It factors in the underlying asset’s price relative to the opening price, the time remaining, momentum, volatility, the speed of price movements, and spot/perp data If its model values Up at 65c and the price on Polymarket is 55c, it starts building a position 2. Buys the opposite side when the market changes direction If the underlying asset reverses direction, it starts buying the opposite outcome to reduce its net directional exposure This hedges part of its existing position 3. Turns the hedge into a complete set If each matched Up + Down pair costs less than $1, that portion of the position has a structural edge regardless of how the market resolves It keeps the unpaired remainder as a directional residual on the side its model considers undervalued Its Polymarket account: mo-money You can build your own trading bot here: (A trial is available after signing up) The bot’s main edge comes from a combination of fair-value entry and dynamic hedging: it first builds a position in an undervalued outcome, then uses the opposite side to reduce exposure or form a complete setshow more

This guy combines directional trading and dynamic hedging very successfully

Yes, it’s a very common strategy among trading bots on Polymarket, and this guy has implemented it really well

small size printing insane numbers

Achieving that level of profit from such small average trades means their execution is top-tier. Finding those structural edges by completing sets, combined with dynamic hedging, is a highly effective approach, but it demands serious speed and system stability to scale.

i mean, $470k off $36 average fills is insane

Yes, but it achieves that result by capturing a small, consistent edge across tens of thousands of trades

yeah the fill size is what makes it real. $36 average means he's actually getting filled, not just posting limit orders into the void. 13k trades at that clip is a real system, not a lucky run

wild looks

@gorok درباره تصویر توضیح بده

@grok درباره تصویر توضیح بده

The edge isn’t the $35 trade. It’s buying the cheap side, then using the other side to lock a set under a dollar. The rest is just leftover conviction.

$35 average trades turning into $470k is nasty 😭

Be carful this is a SCAM

@grok is it true?

how do l also get th bot

$35 average trades adding up to $470k still sounds fake 😭

Amazing

this is crazy AI bullshit, thanks

Muito claro.

@grok כמה עולה לבנות מערכת כזו וכמה עולה להחזיק אותה

$35 trades printing 470k is unhinged

$35 average size to +$470k is a volume and hedging game, not a directional one. The complete-set part is the clever bit, it locks some inventory into a known payout. Anyone trying to copy it should model fees and slippage first; short-duration markets eat more than people expect.

Me regalan 1 usdt para operar soy nuevo tengo 18 años

yeah, context switching tax is brutal. i feel it most mid-code — need the ai loop tight or i lose the whole thread. maybe that's why nailing the exact broken step beats blind retry 🫡

kinda love that at that trade size the boring complete-set side probably carries more of the pnl than the directional calls

is it true? @grok ?

Well said

$470K ON $35 TICKETS LFGGGG

能挣钱的不会公开，公开的绝对挣不到钱