Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This is Lithium, visualized as a quantum wavepacket. The bright structures are 3D isosurfaces of the outer electron’s probability density, while colour represents the complex phase. Unlike Hydrogen, Lithium’s valence electron moves in a screened potential created by the nucleus and the closed 1s² core. The animation solves that...

176,633 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

31 Kommentare

Profilbild von Tobie Venne
Tobie Vennevor 1 Monat

Lithium... top tier nucleator.. Why do you think there was over 200kg of it on the MH370 flight....

Profilbild von Larry Panozzo
Larry Panozzovor 1 Monat

Reality is wild, and most of it is invisible to us

Profilbild von Pode
Podevor 1 Monat

Neat. Now do the nucleus 😜

Profilbild von Janne Särkelä
Janne Särkelävor 1 Monat

@DanielleFong The real disturbance in the fo… field

Profilbild von M
Mvor 1 Monat

how much of this visualization is possible from tying down the pde to random timevalues

Profilbild von drdonhen
drdonhenvor 1 Monat

cf (from first principles):

Profilbild von Mythic: CEO of Gnoticing
Mythic: CEO of Gnoticingvor 1 Monat

"I know Gravity is Electromagnetic, but I can't prove it yet..."

Profilbild von Stone Kaiju ᯅ ⚡ ³³º¹
Stone Kaiju ᯅ ⚡ ³³º¹vor 1 Monat

Trace amounts may be a cure for Alzheimer’s Lithium orate has been used successfully in tests with rats as this form is able to pass through the blood brain barrier.  Study Reference: Published in Nature (August 6, 2025) by Dr. Bruce Yankner’s lab at Harvard Medical School (Title: Lithium deficiency drives Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive decline).  Key Findings: Mass spectrometry of human post-mortem brains revealed selective early depletion of trace lithium in the prefrontal cortex during MCI. Pathological Aβ plaques act as a physical sink, sequestering free ionic lithium.  Mechanism: Lithium depletion disinhibits GSK3β, driving tau phosphorylation, microglial dysfunction, and synaptic loss.  Pharmacokinetics: Among 16 tested salts, low-dose lithium orotate bypassed plaque sequestration (unlike lithium carbonate) and restored cognitive function in mouse models at roughly 1/1000th of psychiatric dosages.  Clinical Status: Human pilot and biomarker trials (e.g., Johns Hopkins) are currently underway. Patients/family should be advised against OTC self-medication due to unverified human safety dosing, unregulated supplement purity, and potential renal/thyroid monitoring needs.

Profilbild von Chad DiGirolamo
Chad DiGirolamovor 1 Monat

No wonder our “science” is jacked

Profilbild von Farmer Skot
Farmer Skotvor 1 Monat

Incredible work.

Profilbild von stunspot | ⟨🤩⨯📍⟩ |
stunspot | ⟨🤩⨯📍⟩ |vor 1 Monat

Now: Why the FUCK is there so MUCH of the damned stuff all over the place?!?!

Profilbild von LaserEyeRobot
LaserEyeRobotvor 1 Monat

I knew it!

Profilbild von N.A. Cottrell
N.A. Cottrellvor 1 Monat

matter

Profilbild von fFaceCharli and Mr. E present YOUR DOOM, or 4given
fFaceCharli and Mr. E present YOUR DOOM, or 4givenvor 1 Monat

#farout , man.

Profilbild von Astro 🏴
Astro 🏴vor 1 Monat

Brother, no need for digital animations of atoms and elementary particles. The ancient hidden mountain tribe “Afareet Al Jibaal” in modern day Iraq/Iran have a custom blend of components that enables directed higher dimensional journeys. But it’s not for the faint of heart 🤣

Profilbild von Pai Mei
Pai Meivor 1 Monat

Dude that’s a jawbreaker.

Profilbild von Dale Cloudman
Dale Cloudmanvor 1 Monat

Why does anyone refer to electrons as particles anymore... it is just not a particle.

Profilbild von Mantis Shrimp
Mantis Shrimpvor 1 Monat

Beyond physical intuition. So weird.

Profilbild von Frankenbyte
Frankenbytevor 1 Monat

Really nice!🌟

Profilbild von wuchengying
wuchengyingvor 1 Monat

alive

Profilbild von Jeff
Jeffvor 1 Monat

115 please 🙂

Profilbild von Avisek kumar
Avisek kumarvor 1 Monat

Hi , I wanted to know if we can extend this to cluster of atoms to see the quantum fluctuations of the larger body

Profilbild von MathPolice
MathPolicevor 1 Monat

Stunning and elucidating as usual. Tangentially related:

Profilbild von Mauro
Maurovor 1 Monat

Adore the math behind it

Profilbild von CD
CDvor 1 Monat

Beating like a living organ. Does this mean that matter is alive ?

Profilbild von BROOKLYDAMUS
BROOKLYDAMUSvor 1 Monat

Closed eye visuals

Profilbild von FaraOne
FaraOnevor 1 Monat

Amazing!

Profilbild von Dale Cloudman
Dale Cloudmanvor 1 Monat

And they call it 'inert' matter

Profilbild von Jose Angel Solorzano Luna
Jose Angel Solorzano Lunavor 1 Monat

@grok I love to eat edible lithium lollipops as a quantum wavepacket

Profilbild von Alchemy
Alchemyvor 1 Monat

Is this real or simulation image @grok ?

Profilbild von winter ❄️
winter ❄️vor 1 Monat

boundary conditions

Ähnliche Videos

Quantum mechanics has a reputation for being mystical mainly because people skip the rules and jump to interpretations. In this lecture series, we’re doing the opposite. We start from the rules, follow the algebra, and let the picture be the calculation. Classical Probability Theory combines alternatives by adding their probabilities. Quantum Theory combines them one step earlier…add complex amplitudes first, then square at the end. That swap in order is everything. Expand |a₁ + a₂|² and you don’t just get |a₁|² + |a₂|²…you get a cross-term, 2 Re(a₁ a₂*). Its sign is set by phase, so the same two contributions can reinforce or cancel. Interference is just the algebra of squaring a sum. In the 3D render, the surface height is proportional to |a(x)| (so peaks become bright bands after squaring), while the surface skin is colored by the local phase arg(a(x)). As the phase knob φ(t) is swept on path 2, the cross-term oscillates, and you literally watch the interference ridges slide across the screen. We model a detector screen with coordinates x in R² (think x = (x,y)). A quantum state assigns a complex amplitude a(x). The rule for outcomes is p(x) = |a(x)|² Now the key situation: two coherent alternatives contribute to the same outcome x. Let their amplitudes be a₁(x) and a₂(x). Quantum says a(x) = a₁(x) + a₂(x) So the probability density becomes p(x) = |a₁(x) + a₂(x)|² Expand it (this is the whole episode): p(x) = (a₁ + a₂)(a₁* + a₂*) = |a₁|² + |a₂|² + a₁ a₂* + a₁* a₂ = |a₁|² + |a₂|² + 2 Re(a₁ a₂*) That last term is the interference term. It can be positive or negative. To see phase explicitly, write each contribution in polar form: a₁(x) = r₁(x) exp(i θ₁(x)) a₂(x) = r₂(x) exp(i θ₂(x)) Then a₁ a₂* = r₁ r₂ exp(i(θ₁ − θ₂)) So the cross-term is 2 Re(a₁ a₂*) = 2 r₁ r₂ cos(θ₁(x) − θ₂(x)) That’s the fringe engine: p(x) = r₁² + r₂² + 2 r₁ r₂ cos(Δθ(x)) Now the phase knob we animate: Add a controllable phase shift φ to path 2: a₂(x) → a₂(x) exp(i φ) Then Δθ(x) → Δθ(x) − φ, so p(x; φ) = r₁² + r₂² + 2 r₁ r₂ cos(Δθ(x) − φ) As φ changes smoothly, the bright/dark pattern slides continuously. Same setup, same geometry, same magnitudes r₁,r₂, only phase changed. #QuantumMechanics #WaveInterference #ComplexAmplitudes #DoubleSlit #Physics #Mathematics

Mathelirium

81,784 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Why Does Quantum Mechanics Use a Complex Wavefunction? Schrödinger’s equation doesn’t start from mystery. It starts from a very specific bet. The state of a particle is a complex field ψ(x,t), and whatever time-evolution rule we choose has to move ψ forward while preserving total probability. So the basic question is simple. What equation should ψ satisfy so that |ψ|² behaves like a conserved density, the way mass density does in fluid flow? What is ψ? Think of ψ(x,t) as an amplitude attached to the statement the particle is at position x at time t. It’s not a probability. It’s the thing you add first, and only at the end do you square it: p(x,t) = |ψ(x,t)|² Because ψ is complex, it has magnitude and phase. Write it as ψ(x,t) = r(x,t) exp(i θ(x,t)) Then r² = |ψ|² is the density, and the phase θ ends up controlling the flow through the probability current. Where does Schrödinger’s equation come from? Start with two empirical inputs that tie waves to particles: E = ħ ω p = ħ k Here ħ is Planck’s constant divided by 2π. It’s the conversion factor between frequency and energy, and between wavenumber and momentum. A plane wave with angular frequency ω and wavevector k is ψ(x,t) = A exp(i(k·x − ωt)) Now watch what derivatives do to this wave: ∂ψ/∂t = −i ω ψ ∇ψ = i k ψ ∇²ψ = −|k|² ψ Multiply by ħ and you get: i ħ ∂ψ/∂t = ħ ω ψ = E ψ −i ħ ∇ψ = ħ k ψ = p ψ −ħ² ∇²ψ = ħ² |k|² ψ = p² ψ So for plane waves, the operators Ê = i ħ ∂/∂t p̂ = −i ħ ∇ act like energy and momentum. Now bring in the classical, nonrelativistic energy bookkeeping: E = p²/(2m) + V(x) Kinetic plus potential. That’s it. Turn it into an equation for ψ by replacing E and p with the operators above: Ê ψ = (p̂²/(2m) + V) ψ Since p̂² = (−i ħ ∇)·(−i ħ ∇) = −ħ² ∇², this becomes i ħ ∂ψ/∂t = ( −ħ²/(2m) ∇² + V(x) ) ψ That’s the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. This derivation is a controlled heuristic. Match the plane-wave identities to the measured relations E = ħω and p = ħk, then impose the same energy bookkeeping you trust in classical mechanics. Why this is the right kind of rule If ψ is the state, we need a rule that preserves total probability: ∫ |ψ(x,t)|² dx = 1 Schrödinger evolution does, and you can see it by deriving a continuity equation. Let ρ(x,t) = |ψ|² = ψ*ψ. Differentiate: ∂ρ/∂t = ψ* ∂ψ/∂t + ψ ∂ψ*/∂t Use Schrödinger and its complex conjugate. The potential terms cancel, and what’s left can be rearranged into ∂ρ/∂t + ∇·j = 0 with probability current j = (ħ/(2mi)) ( ψ* ∇ψ − ψ ∇ψ* ) That’s the cleanest way to say what ψ is. |ψ|² behaves like a conserved density, the phase drives a current, and the time evolution is fixed, up to V, by combining wave relations with energy bookkeeping: i ħ ∂ψ/∂t = ( −ħ²/(2m) ∇² + V ) ψ #QuantumMechanics #SchrodingerEquation #WaveFunction #BornRule #Physics #MathematicalPhysics

Mathelirium

20,911 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten