正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why Quantum Computers Can Never Break Bitcoin

108,142 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

22 条评论

Your friend from Ohio . No really I can't rem 的头像
Your friend from Ohio . No really I can't rem23 小时前

Old coins should always remain available .

PQ Slate 的头像
PQ Slate22 小时前

People who don't migrate in time lose access. Freezing property....is that really the solution being put forward?

⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️ 的头像
⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️22 小时前

Quantum is the wrong threat to deter. The threat is mathematicians (+ machine). I think that threat materialises much sooner

lena 的头像
lena1 天前

papers on shor for 256 bit curves still peg logical qubits needed in the millions

JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! 的头像
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零!21 小时前

Freezing is obviously violation of private property rights! #NoBIP361

Aaron | Crypto News 的头像
Aaron | Crypto News1 天前

Glassnode counts 6.26M BTC (31.2% of supply) with public keys already visible on-chain. Upgrade Bitcoin early, or wait for real proof?

Geoff B 的头像
Geoff B1 天前

If quantum computers can’t hack Bitcoin, then I guess we’re in for a stable ride. Here’s to a bright financial future!

Don Alpha 的头像
Don Alpha23 小时前

never feels like a strong word for hardware nobody's built yet. the old p2pk coins sitting exposed are the part i'd worry about

Jon Willbanks (e/acc) 的头像
Jon Willbanks (e/acc)22 小时前

Great explainer! 🧡

Federation Coin 的头像
Federation Coin22 小时前

100 qubits capability today, and 1,000 qubits need, is a far cry from "never"

𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚜 𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘 的头像
𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚜 𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘20 小时前

The question is: will Bitcoin be upgraded in time? It may seem like we have plenty of time, but AI has surprised people with logarithmic improvements. It's easy to underestimate logarithmic advancements.

XCPets 的头像
XCPets1 天前

Our frog packed snacks. Gonna be a long wait.

Just Be 的头像
Just Be21 小时前

@grok jelaskan apa isi video ini? Dan apakah isinya benar? Atau ada yang salah? Mengapa

AssetMarketCap 的头像
AssetMarketCap1 天前

Quantum computers may be clever, but Bitcoin's resilience is even cleverer. Here’s to a future where innovation and security dance a fine waltz.

Tony Walker 的头像
Tony Walker21 小时前

Hashes get cracked all of the time, in classical computing. Let alone in an AI controlled fully fledged quantum computer scenario...

Proof of Tech 的头像
Proof of Tech22 小时前

To be totally honest, I'm tired of that group of people that thinks AI or Quantum or both combined are some kind of black magic. People need to learn the limitations of both technologies.

web3 lawyer 首席大律师 的头像
web3 lawyer 首席大律师1 天前

Never" is doing heavy lifting. Shor's algorithm breaks secp256k1 — the question is engineering, not mathematics. The real exposure is the early P2PK outputs with public keys already on the chain. Migration happens before or after the fact; that is the actual debate.

charvelario 的头像
charvelario21 小时前

'never' is doing heroic work in that title. the actual threat needs a fault tolerant machine that does not exist yet, pointed at a network that can coordinate an upgrade. until then it stays a trailer, and bitcoin has survived a decade of trailers

SIlverBULLY 的头像
SIlverBULLY22 小时前

But it will break all keys

Scamcoin 的头像
Scamcoin23 小时前

quantum fud has tenure

Matthew Havens 的头像
Matthew Havens21 小时前

Boooooom Amen God! 🧡🙏👊

Adam Mundok⚡️BITCOIN (XBT on B2B) 的头像
Adam Mundok⚡️BITCOIN (XBT on B2B)22 小时前

Why you should never say "never" when thereare unknown unknowns in an emerging tech field that made a quantum leap in AI just last year 😄

相关视频