Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why Quantum Computers Can Never Break Bitcoin

108,142 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

22 Comments

Your friend from Ohio . No really I can't rem's profile picture
Your friend from Ohio . No really I can't rem1 day ago

Old coins should always remain available .

PQ Slate's profile picture
PQ Slate23 hours ago

People who don't migrate in time lose access. Freezing property....is that really the solution being put forward?

⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️'s profile picture
⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️23 hours ago

Quantum is the wrong threat to deter. The threat is mathematicians (+ machine). I think that threat materialises much sooner

lena's profile picture
lena1 day ago

papers on shor for 256 bit curves still peg logical qubits needed in the millions

JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零!'s profile picture
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零!22 hours ago

Freezing is obviously violation of private property rights! #NoBIP361

Aaron | Crypto News's profile picture
Aaron | Crypto News1 day ago

Glassnode counts 6.26M BTC (31.2% of supply) with public keys already visible on-chain. Upgrade Bitcoin early, or wait for real proof?

Geoff B's profile picture
Geoff B1 day ago

If quantum computers can’t hack Bitcoin, then I guess we’re in for a stable ride. Here’s to a bright financial future!

Don Alpha's profile picture
Don Alpha1 day ago

never feels like a strong word for hardware nobody's built yet. the old p2pk coins sitting exposed are the part i'd worry about

Jon Willbanks (e/acc)'s profile picture
Jon Willbanks (e/acc)23 hours ago

Great explainer! 🧡

Federation Coin's profile picture
Federation Coin23 hours ago

100 qubits capability today, and 1,000 qubits need, is a far cry from "never"

𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚜 𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘's profile picture
𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚜 𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘21 hours ago

The question is: will Bitcoin be upgraded in time? It may seem like we have plenty of time, but AI has surprised people with logarithmic improvements. It's easy to underestimate logarithmic advancements.

XCPets's profile picture
XCPets1 day ago

Our frog packed snacks. Gonna be a long wait.

Just Be's profile picture
Just Be22 hours ago

@grok jelaskan apa isi video ini? Dan apakah isinya benar? Atau ada yang salah? Mengapa

AssetMarketCap's profile picture
AssetMarketCap1 day ago

Quantum computers may be clever, but Bitcoin's resilience is even cleverer. Here’s to a future where innovation and security dance a fine waltz.

Tony Walker's profile picture
Tony Walker22 hours ago

Hashes get cracked all of the time, in classical computing. Let alone in an AI controlled fully fledged quantum computer scenario...

Proof of Tech's profile picture
Proof of Tech23 hours ago

To be totally honest, I'm tired of that group of people that thinks AI or Quantum or both combined are some kind of black magic. People need to learn the limitations of both technologies.

web3 lawyer 首席大律师's profile picture
web3 lawyer 首席大律师1 day ago

Never" is doing heavy lifting. Shor's algorithm breaks secp256k1 — the question is engineering, not mathematics. The real exposure is the early P2PK outputs with public keys already on the chain. Migration happens before or after the fact; that is the actual debate.

charvelario's profile picture
charvelario22 hours ago

'never' is doing heroic work in that title. the actual threat needs a fault tolerant machine that does not exist yet, pointed at a network that can coordinate an upgrade. until then it stays a trailer, and bitcoin has survived a decade of trailers

SIlverBULLY's profile picture
SIlverBULLY23 hours ago

But it will break all keys

Scamcoin's profile picture
Scamcoin1 day ago

quantum fud has tenure

Matthew Havens's profile picture
Matthew Havens22 hours ago

Boooooom Amen God! 🧡🙏👊

Adam Mundok⚡️BITCOIN (XBT on B2B)'s profile picture
Adam Mundok⚡️BITCOIN (XBT on B2B)1 day ago

Why you should never say "never" when thereare unknown unknowns in an emerging tech field that made a quantum leap in AI just last year 😄

Related Videos