I looked at past Elf comics and listed her... (cartoon) crimes: -stalking -harassment -verbal abuse -disorderly conduct -criminal intimidation -incitement to violence -animal attack facilitation -arson -attempted assault by supernatural means -assault and battery -vandalism -destruction of property -mass property destruction -aggravated assault -attempted murder -assault on a law enforcement officer -unlawful discharge of a weapon -breaking and entering -trespassing -criminal negligence resulting in death -depraved indifference to human life -war crimes -littering -murder -desecration and mutilation of a corpse -unlawful disposal of centaur remains -cannibalism facilitation -poisoning food products -unauthorized spaceflight / illegal orbital entry -destruction of a protected cultural or religious site -vandalism of a sacred site -trespassing in a restricted hazardous zone -coercion -reckless public endangerment -intentional infliction of emotional distress -attempted vehicular homicide -reckless driving -reckless discharge of a firearm -attempted murder-suicide -destruction of a vehicle -reckless endangerment -assault with a deadly weapon -brandishing a weapon -criminal threats -disturbing the peace -armed trespassing -disruption of a religious ceremony -intimidation -public intoxication -failure to render aid -depraved indifference to centaur lifeshow more

🚨(Minneapolis) A Border Patrol agent was caught on camera... illegally assaulting U.S. citizens in a public park. In the video, you can see the agent walking down the sidewalk towards a smoke canister. He kicks it not once, but TWICE, directly towards the feet of people trying to get away. And then, he casually turns around and walks away. He was in no danger. The people were not blocking any agents. They weren’t even near the street. And he purposely walked out of his way, towards the people who were walking AWAY from him, to kick a chemical weapon at them. This isn’t just reckless… it’s illegal. Under federal and state law, intentionally using a chemical irritant to harm or intimidate civilians is assault. Beyond assault, this is reckless endangerment and excessive use of force, which violates both constitutional protections and civil statutes. AND he did this in a park, right next to a playground. ICE and Border Patrol agents ARE the criminals and terrorists.show more

While most protests are peaceful, a few isolated cases... of looting have been reported in Mpumalanga and KZN over the past 24 hours. •Ministry of Police Confirms Arrests for Looting and Attempted Looting, Urges Peaceful Demonstrations: SA Police Service 🇿🇦 Whilst policing operations have been effective thus far, with demonstrations remaining largely peaceful across the country, police have responded to isolated incidents of looting and attempted looting. The Ministry of Police confirms that the South African Police Service (SAPS) has, since the early hours of this morning, arrested several individuals in connection with incidents of looting and attempted looting reported in parts of the country as law enforcement continues to monitor the planned marches taking place nationwide today, 30 June. Police remain on high alert, with heightened deployments in place to ensure public safety, protect businesses and critical infrastructure, and maintain law and order. Members deployed across the country have been instructed to act swiftly and decisively against anyone who engages in criminal activities, including looting, attempted looting, public violence, malicious damage to property, intimidation, or any other unlawful conduct. In responding to these arrests, the Acting Minister of Police, Mr Firoz Cachalia, expressed the following: “We urge citizens to exercise their constitutional rights responsibly and to ensure that demonstrations remain peaceful and lawful. Those who choose to exploit the marches to commit criminal acts will face the full might of the law. Police will continue to identify, arrest, and prosecute all those responsible for criminal conduct.”show more

🚨 Possible verdicts in the Lindsay Clancy trial The... jury in the Lindsay Clancy case (Plymouth Superior Court) is now deliberating three counts of first-degree murder. Because she has admitted causing the deaths, the main question is whether she was criminally responsible and, if so, which level of homicide applies. Massachusetts has no death penalty. For each child the verdict slip gives these options: 🚨1. Guilty of first-degree murder Requires proof of either deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty (or both). This is a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole. 🚨2. Guilty of second-degree murder The jury finds she caused the deaths with malice (intent to kill, intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or an act a reasonable person would know created a plain and strong likelihood of death) but without the extra first-degree elements. Sentence is life with the possibility of parole. 🚨3. Guilty of manslaughter A lesser included offense the judge allowed the jury to consider. This would mean the deaths resulted from wanton or reckless conduct rather than murder. Maximum sentence is 20 years per count; the judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively. 🚨4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (NCR) The defense theory: she had a mental disease or defect (postpartum psychosis) that left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or to conform her conduct to the law. The prosecution must disprove this beyond a reasonable doubt. An NCR verdict is an acquittal on the criminal charges, but it triggers civil commitment to a secure psychiatric facility under Massachusetts law. She would not simply walk free. The 12 deliberating jurors must be unanimous on each count. A hung jury on any count would produce a mistrial on that charge and the possibility of a retrial.show more

A 17-year-old Swedish YouTuber was just violently attacked in... broad daylight by an Antifa mob in central Stockholm. Leading the attack was Joel Bjurströmer Almgren, a convicted far-left terrorist who gained national attention after being sentenced for attempted murder. Since then, he has built a criminal record that includes violent assaults, illegal weapons possession, and threats against public officials. One of his accomplices, Hjalmar Hagström, pepper-sprayed the teenager in the face before the mob chased Mijo Eklund through the streets. The victim managed to escape into a café, where he waited for police protection. Also present was Emma Hagberg, Almgren’s wife and a long-time Antifa militant. During a previous criminal investigation, police discovered Antifa doxxing posters and far-left propaganda in her basement storage unit. No legacy media outlet has reported on this politically motivated assault on a defenseless teenager. Ask yourself why. 🔗 Read more about the the militants present at the assault:show more

BREAKING: Louisiana Man Arrested for Murder of Deputy U.S.... Marshal Drew Hanson A Louisiana man is now facing federal criminal charges after authorities say he fatally shot Deputy U.S. Marshal Drew Hanson while officers attempted to serve an arrest warrant at his Alexandria home. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Louisiana announced that Clarence A. Frazier Jr., 48, has been charged by criminal complaint with the murder of Deputy U.S. Marshal Hanson. Prosecutors say Frazier allegedly opened fire on law enforcement officers as they attempted to arrest him after he failed to appear for trial on a state charge of sexual battery involving a person with infirmities. Hanson's father, Mike Hanson, gave a heartbreaking tribute. He described a son whose greatest title wasn't simply deputy marshal, but father. "My son lived his life with a courage and a kindness that most people only read about. He was a United States Marshal... Wearing that badge was his dream from the time he was young." "But beyond the badge, beyond the duty, he was an extraordinary father. His family was the center of his world... He never met a stranger. If you crossed his path, you walked away feeling seen, welcomed, and valued." If convicted, Frazier faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison or the death penalty. Prayers up for the Hanson family. 🙏show more

Woman Stabbed In Huddersfield, Four Teenage Boys Arrested. A... young mother is fighting for her life in hospital after being stabbed and beaten in a horrifying daylight attack in Huddersfield. The 30 year old woman suffered serious stab wounds and devastating head and neck injuries when she was attacked in Topaz Close on Monday, May 11. West Yorkshire Police said the victim was left badly injured at the scene in what officers are treating as an attempted murder. Yesterday, Saturday 16 May, officers arrested four local teenage boys in a series of raids. A 17 year old boy from Huddersfield has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. Three other teenagers, aged 18, 17 and 16, all from Huddersfield, were arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender. All four remain in custody. Kirklees CID detectives have described the assault as extremely serious and are still appealing for witnesses who may witnessed the assault. A police spokesman said: "We are continuing to investigate this dreadful incident. A woman was stabbed and sustained serious head and neck injuries. She remains in hospital where her condition is described as serious." Detectives are urging anyone with information, CCTV, doorbell footage or dashcam video from the area around Topaz Close on the afternoon of Monday 11 May to come forward immediately. The four teenagers in custody have not yet been charged. The victim remains remains in hospital in a critical condition. Anyone with information is urged to contact Kirklees CID via 101 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111. #UKNews #CrimeNews #Huddersfield #WestYorkshireshow more

So a lot has been said about Hearts players... being assaulted without any evidence to back it up. Edited footage of the attached video, shows a Celtic fan pushing a Hearts player - I can't distinguish who but others will be able to - however, the edited footage does not tell the full story or context suiting the agendas of those posting it up. The attached video shows the full interaction between the Hearts player and Celtic fan - and here is my take on it along with references to Scots Law after speaking to an acquaintance within the field. The Celtic fan, like others on the pitch, can be charged with Breach of the Peace for simply entering the field of play and the Celtic fan in question will almost certainly face such a charge. However, here is where it gets sticky. He is not breaking the law by simply goading or laughing at the Hearts player and videoing it. Under Scots Law, if someone knocks your phone out of your hand and then proceeds to stamp on it repeatedly - as the Hearts player did - then they can be charged with criminal damage (vandalism under the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995). Under section 52 of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995, vandalism is committed when someone “wilfully or recklessly” destroys or damages property belonging to another “without reasonable excuse.” A mobile phone clearly falls within “property belonging to another,” and repeatedly stamping on it generally satisfies the “without reasonable excuse” and “wilful or reckless” requirements. It doesn’t matter if the incident happens on public/private property or in this case on a football pitch. The person who stomps on the phone is still potentially facing a charge for vandalism, even if the Celtic fan seen here is committing a breach of the peace by entering the field of play. The breach of the peace charge would be dealt with separately, it doesn’t erase the Hearts player's criminal responsibility for trying to destroy the fan's property. The Celtic fan is then seen pushing the footballer away in order to stop them from destroying their phone/property and attempts to recover it before stewards pounce on him, that push may amount to lawful self-defence or defence of property if it's proportionate and immediate, which in this case seems to be the case. Under Scots law, force is allowed if there’s an imminent threat, that the force is necessary, and it’s not excessive. A brief, measured push to create distance or break contact is usually treated as reasonable, not criminal assault. The Hearts player fell into this category when he initially swatted the phone out of the fan's hand and so too did the fan by pushing the Hearts player away in an attempt to retrieve his property. But as soon as the Hearts player started stamping on the phone that is deemed excessive force. Legally, the fan's breach of the peace [invasion of the pitch and goading] doesn’t give the Hearts player a licence to destroy the fan's property; and the fan's efforts to protect his own property can be deemed lawful, as long as the force used is proportionate and immediate. And yet, given the nature of the pitch invasion and the media coverage of it - the Hearts player could ultimately dodge any charge not because he is not guilty of committing a crime, but because the COPFS apply the 'public interest' test - even if evidence exists, they may conclude that prosecution is not in the public interest because of factors such as: 1. The relatively low value of the phone vs wider consequences (a star player, media circus, club reputation) 2. The player’s status and the likely impact on the sport or club 3. Whether alternative measures (internal club sanctions, fines, apologies, civil settlement) are seen as “sufficient.” Prosecutors are not obliged to prosecute every technically guilty act. As for the fan, as mentioned earlier, his entry onto the pitch is deemed a Breach of the Peace and he would be charged, fined, and issued with a football banning order - with Celtic also potentially banning him for x number of years. Ps/ Much of this was told to me verbatim and I have put it into my own words as much as I can. I am not an expert in Scots Law, I do not profess to be, the above is as told to me by someone in Criminal Law. #celticfc #spflshow more

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are assaulting U.S. citizens on... public sidewalks in Minneapolis. In the video, agents are walking down a public sidewalk. A man is standing there, doing nothing but existing in public space. He glances back, and an agent uses both hands to shove him off the sidewalk toward the street, then casually walks away. Moments later, another person is standing on the same sidewalk. An agent pushes them into the street, directly in front of a car, and continues across the crosswalk as if nothing happened. Let’s be clear about what this is. This is assault. This is use of force without legal justification. This is reckless endangerment, pushing people into traffic. This is deprivation of civil rights under color of law. This is law enforcement interfering with lawful use of public space without cause, orders, or any articulated threat. These are members of the community, on their own sidewalks, not blocking anyone, not threatening anyone, not committing a crime. ICE agents do not have the authority to clear sidewalks by force, and they absolutely do not have the authority to put civilians in danger because they feel entitled to the space. If any ordinary person shoved strangers into traffic, they’d be arrested on the spot. When federal agents do it, we’re told to look away. So ask yourself this: If armed federal agents can assault U.S. citizens for standing on a sidewalk, what exactly is left of the rule of law?show more

Man Arrested for Brutal Assault on Schoolgirl Over Mango... Theft in Maiduguri By: Zagazola Makama A man identified as Mamman Shettima Baba has been arrested for brutally beating a young schoolgirl for plucking mangoes from a compound in the Pompomari Housing Estate of Maiduguri. The incident, captured on video and circulated widely on social media, showed Shettima Baba repeatedly flogging the girl with a thick stick while his wife recorded the assault, encouraging him to “beat her more.” According to eyewitnesses, the girl and her friends were on their way home from school when they noticed an open gate with a mango tree inside. Acting on youthful curiosity, they entered the compound and picked some mangoes. However, some Almajiri children caught one of the girls and handed her over to the woman residing in the house. She, in turn, ordered her husband to violently punish the child. The Nigerian Security and Civil Defense Corps (NSCDC) responded swiftly to the viral video and arrested the suspect. The Commandant of the Corps, Abdulrazaq Haroon, confirmed the arrest and added that during preliminary investigations, Shettima Baba confessed to the assault, justifying his actions by claiming that students had been persistently plucking mangoes from his tree. The brutality of the attack, however, has sparked public outrage, with legal practitioners, child rights activists, and government officials demanding strict legal action against the suspect. In response to the attack, Hamza Nuhu Dantani, a legal practitioner, has petitioned the Borno State Commissioner of Police, calling for the immediate arrest and prosecution of the suspect. The petition outlines charges of culpable homicide, assault, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt, citing violations of the Borno State Penal Code Law, 2023. It also accuses the suspect of attempted homicide and calls for: The immediate arrest and prosecution of Shettima Baba. A full investigation to identify and prosecute any accomplices. Medical and psychological support for the traumatized young victim. A public warning against violence and abuse of minors. Meanwhile, The Borno State Commissioner of Education, Lawan Abbah Wakilbe, and the Commissioner of Justice have both assured the public that justice will be served. Wakilbe gave the assurance when he visited the NSCSC command and commend the officers for the swift intervention. My take; Despite public outcry and legal provisions protecting minors, cases of human rights abuses in Borno State often fail to reach their logical conclusion. Many perpetrators walk free due to political influence, connections with high-ranking officials, or social stigma that discourages victims from seeking justice. In several past cases, suspects were released without trial, while victims or their families were pressured into withdrawing complaints. The culture of impunity surrounding child abuse, domestic violence, and police brutality in the state has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the legal system in holding offenders accountable. Observers are closely watching how this latest case will be handled, as many believe it could set a precedent for future human rights cases in the state. Prof. Babagana Umara Zulum mustapha wakilbe Nigeria Police Force NHRC Nigeriashow more

Attempt to Kill? XL6 Driver Drags Man on Bonnet... in Broad Daylight In Bengaluru A shocking case of road rage was caught on camera on 11th February 2026 at around 12:45 PM on Old Airport Road in Bengaluru. In the disturbing visuals, a Maruti Suzuki XL6 bearing registration number KA03NN4501 can be seen speeding recklessly while a man is lying on the bonnet of the moving vehicle. Eyewitnesses reported that the driver was driving at a very high speed, endangering not only the man on the bonnet but also other commuters on the busy stretch. The man on the bonnet was seen shouting and pleading with the driver to stop the car, but the driver allegedly continued to accelerate without concern for human life. The act has raised serious concerns about public safety and reckless behavior on city roads. Such behavior is not just irresponsible it is criminal. Dragging a person on the bonnet of a speeding car shows a complete disregard for human life and traffic laws. Roads are meant for safe travel, not for settling personal disputes in a life-threatening manner. Incidents like these could have easily resulted in a fatality.Upon further verification, it has come to light that the driver is reportedly a previous offender in cases related to rash driving. Additionally, checks revealed that the vehicle’s insurance policy had expired, which is another violation of the Motor Vehicles Act. Operating a vehicle without valid insurance and engaging in repeated reckless driving reflects blatant negligence and a lack of accountability. According to the DCP EAST, a case has been registered against the driver, and further investigation is underway. Authorities have assured that strict action will be taken as per the law. This incident once again highlights the growing menace of road rage and reckless driving in Bengaluru. Strict enforcement, heavy penalties, and cancellation of licenses for repeat offenders are necessary to ensure that such dangerous individuals are kept off the roads before innocent lives are lost. #bangalore #bengaluru #roadrage ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ನಗರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್‌ BengaluruCityPolice ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಸಂಚಾರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ BengaluruTrafficPolice CP Bengaluru ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಆಯುಕ್ತ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು Joint CP, Traffic, Bengaluru alok kumar DGP KARNATAKA ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ Karnataka State Police S. Lalitha ChristinMathewPhilipshow more

The events surrounding Sandlana’s arrest reveal a man who... operates far beyond the reach of ordinary accountability. When law-enforcement attempted to execute a lawful warrant, they did not encounter a private citizen but a fortified power centre protected by armed guards, perimeter security, and crowds mobilised to resist the State. Officers were surrounded, shoved back, injured, and even dispossessed of an official firearm. That level of coordinated defiance reflects neither panic nor misunderstanding it reflects a command structure whose members respond to Sandlana with military-style discipline. Vusi Ndala’s own video and who is out on bail, in which he threatens that anyone seeking to arrest Sandlana must first arrest an entire council or congregation, confirms the existence of a machinery of intimidation deliberately engineered to shield him from accountability. Such conduct is irreconcilable with the conditions of bail and demonstrates the applicant’s capacity to raise organised resistance at any moment. The danger is heightened by the calculated manner in which the applicant and his associates sought to avoid arrest. When confronted with a lawful warrant, Sandlana denied being on the property, stalled for time, and used the presence of his followers to delay police operations for hours. His associates, including Ndala, have repeatedly fled to the same compound when facing arrest precisely because they know they will find protection behind loyal guards and mobilised crowds primed to obstruct law-enforcement. These are not the actions of individuals who respect legal authority; they reveal a belief that the law can be outnumbered, overwhelmed, or intimidated into retreat. Returning such an individual to the very environment that enabled this obstruction would invite further evasion, further mobilisation, and further destabilisation of State authority. Compounding these risks is the applicant’s demonstrated ability to manipulate, corrupt, or intimidate elements within the justice system itself. He has cultivated influence within judicial, legal, and administrative processes, enabling him to secure tactical advantages, distort proceedings, or weaponise courts against witnesses. His resources and network allow him not only to obstruct investigations on the ground but to interfere with institutional mechanisms from within. An individual capable of enticing or co-opting justice officials cannot be trusted to comply with bail conditions; instead, he will exploit release to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and strategically undermine the administration of justice. Beyond the physical and institutional threats lies a broader public risk. Granting bail to a person who can summon violent resistance, defy lawful arrest, and marshal crowds to confront police would signal that influence, intimidation, and power can override the law. At a time when public trust in the criminal justice system is already fragile, such a decision would deepen the perception that powerful individuals operate under different rules. Witnesses would be terrified, investigators discouraged, and the public disillusioned. Protecting the integrity of the justice system, safeguarding the safety of law-enforcement, and preserving public order all point to one unavoidable conclusion: Sandlana must not be granted bail. NPASouthAfrica The Presidency 🇿🇦 SA Police Service 🇿🇦show more

A chilling web of deceit that kept a Jamnagar... family in the dark for two straight years has finally unravelled, uncovering a cold-blooded murder disguised as an overseas career opportunity. What began as a prolonged missing person investigation has turned into a grim homicide inquiry after Gujarat Police exposed a plot involving an unfaithful spouse, her lover, and a fatal dose of poison. The victim, Jignesh Dharmeshbhai Mavdiya, went missing nearly two years ago. For twenty-four months, his wife, Prithvi Mavdiya, maintained a detailed cover story, assuring anxious relatives that Jignesh had moved to Australia for work. She claimed his new employer enforced a strict workplace policy banning mobile phones, explaining why he was completely unreachable for two years. However, the prolonged mystery began to fracture when Jignesh's brother, Ashok Dharamshibhai Mavdiya, grew increasingly suspicious over the total lack of direct communication. When Ashok insisted on involving the police to locate his brother, the tension forced a dramatic breakthrough in the case. Subsequent police interrogation of Prithvi brought the horrific truth to light. Investigators revealed that Prithvi had been carrying on an illicit relationship with Nilesh Mansukhbhai Kashetiya. Eager to eliminate Jignesh from their lives, the pair devised a plan to murder him. According to preliminary investigative findings, the duo offered Jignesh liquor spiked with deadly sodium cyanide. Once the poison took his life, Prithvi and Nilesh transported his body to a factory premises in the Dared industrial area of Jamnagar. To conceal all evidence, they dug a pit roughly 12 to 15 feet deep and buried the body beneath the ground, setting off the two-year deception. Following revelations during interrogation, law enforcement officers rushed to the site in Dared accompanied by forensic experts. Authorities initiated excavation at the location pointed out by the accused to recover human remains and collect vital scientific evidence. Jamnagar Police are in the process of registering formal charges against both Prithvi Mavdiya and Nilesh Kashetiya under relevant sections for murder and destruction of evidence. The news of a local resident being poisoned and buried under a factory floor while his family was fed lies about an Australian job for two years has sent shockwaves through the region.show more

𝗕𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗣𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗸𝗵𝗿𝗶 𝗞𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘁: 𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻’𝘀... 𝗔𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗖𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 In a deeply concerning escalation of military operations in Sheikhri Kalat, Balochistan, in past few days, Pakistani security forces have launched a campaign of collective punishment targeting civilian populations. Local reports confirm that at least three towns in the area have been subjected to severe military aggression, resulting in the enforced disappearance and extrajudicial killing of residents. One of the most tragic incidents involved Bakhtiar Ahmed Baloch, who was fatally shot by Frontier Corps (FC) personnel after he reportedly urged the forces not to conduct disruptive search operations in residential areas that were distressing local women and children. Following his killing, his son and nephew were also forcibly disappeared, with no information provided to the family regarding their whereabouts. Eyewitness accounts further detail the destruction of approximately 80 to 100 homes by bulldozers. In addition, vital civilian infrastructure—including solar energy systems, water sources, gardens, and crops—was deliberately destroyed. These are essential for the people survival and livelihood in these areas. The operation has led to the mass displacement of families, many of whom were forced to flee without being allowed to take their personal belongings. When some residents attempted to return to retrieve basic necessities, they were met with threats and were denied access to their homes by the stationed forces. Many displaced families have now sought refuge in Kalat city, where they continue to face hardship and uncertainty, pleading for the right to return to their homes and to live without fear. These actions represent serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights standards. The use of collective punishment, the targeting of civilians, the destruction of civilian property, and the obstruction of safe return for displaced persons constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other international human rights treaties to which Pakistan is a signatory. We urge the United Nations, international human rights bodies, and the global community to urgently investigate these incidents in Sheikhri Kalat and hold the Pakistani state accountable. Continued silence and inaction will only enable further atrocities and deepen the humanitarian crisis in Balochistan. #StopBalochGenocideshow more

A 42 year old man, #Deepak, died by suicide... in #Kerala after a video posted by #Shimjitha accusing him of inappropriate behaviour (#SexualHarassment) on a bus went viral. What followed was not justice, it was a digital lynching. The video that Shimjitha uploaded does not clearly show any deliberate sexual act. It shows a crowded bus, a man standing at a distance, and a fleeting moment where his elbow appears to brush past her as he gets down. Multiple viewers and eyewitnesses, including those quoted on television debates, have said the contact appeared unintentional, a consequence of overcrowding. Despite this ambiguity, Shimjitha chose to upload the video publicly, frame it as intentional harassment, allow it to spread unchecked to nearly 2 million views, only after the damage was done did she delete the video. This is where accountability comes in. If the act was intentional, the law was available. Kerala has clear legal mechanisms for dealing with harassment in public transport. Filing a police complaint would have ensured investigation, evidence, and due process. Instead, she chose social media as a courtroom. When you publicly accuse someone of a serious offence, You take responsibility for the consequences. You cannot later claim neutrality You cannot undo reputational damage by deleting a post. Deepak did not get a chance to defend himself. He did not get a fair inquiry. He got humiliation, abuse, and public branding as a criminal. And he paid with his life. This is not about silencing women. Women must speak up against harassment, and real offenders must be punished. But reckless accusations without verification harm genuine victims too. When ambiguous incidents are projected as crimes for online validation, trust in real complaints erodes. Social media outrage is not justice. Viral videos are not verdicts. Public shaming is not accountability. Shimjitha may stand by her allegation. That is her rig. But society has the right, and duty to question the method, the timing, and the consequences of her actions. One life is already lost. If this case doesn’t make us rethink how casually we destroy people online, then the next tragedy is only a post away.show more

A deeply disturbing incident has come to light from... Indore Airport, where a female passenger alleges that she was harassed and mistreated by an Air India staff member during what should have been a routine boarding process. According to her account, the staffer snatched her boarding pass, behaved aggressively, and even threatened to call security without offering any explanation for denying her boarding. Matters escalated further when he allegedly attempted to snatch her phone as she tried to record the incident for her own safety.What makes this ordeal even more alarming is that she was travelling alone at night, feeling vulnerable and shaken, yet the airport security personnel standing right beside her remained completely passive, offering no assistance or intervention as the situation unfolded. Instead of safeguarding a passenger in distress which is their primary duty the authorities stood by in silence, effectively allowing the harassment to continue unchecked.The passenger further mentioned that when she attempted to document the incident, she was subjected to even more intimidation and harassment, creating an environment of fear and helplessness. It was only because of the support extended by fellow travellers who witnessed the unacceptable behaviour firsthand that she was ultimately allowed to board the flight. The staff had no legitimate grounds to deny her boarding, and their attempt to do so appears to have been an abuse of power and position.For someone who has been a loyal Air India customer for years, this experience has left her extremely distressed, shaken, and in complete disbelief. No traveller especially a woman travelling alone should be subjected to such disrespect, aggression, or unprofessional behaviour at an airport, of all places. This incident raises serious questions about the functioning of Air India staff, the training they receive, and the accountability mechanisms within the airline. It also reflects poorly on the airport authorities, whose silence and inaction contributed to the trauma faced by the passenger. When security personnel fail to protect passengers, it signals a dangerous lapse in protocol and a lack of responsibility.Airports are supposed to be secure, professional, and safe environments. Yet incidents like this expose a disturbing reality where misconduct goes unchecked, power is misused, and authorities look the other way instead of doing their job. If this is the standard of behaviour from airline staff and security officials, it is a matter of serious concern for all passengers who travel through such airports.Strong systems, strict disciplinary action, and zero tolerance for harassment are long overdue. Incidents like this should serve as a wake-up call for both Air India and the airport authorities to fix their internal culture, protect passengers, and restore public trust. #bangalore #bengaluru #indore Airports Authority of India Air India DGCA #airindia #aviation #dgca #airlines #assault #harassment #civilaviation #indigo IndiGo Indore Commissioner Collector Indore Commissioner of Police,Indore Madhya Pradesh Police S. Lalitha ChristinMathewPhilipshow more

A "maniac" with a history of random attacks on... women — who also once decapitated a pigeon in the middle of Penn Station — was released again after his latest arrest, for allegedly kicking a 7-year-old boy in an unprovoked Brooklyn attack. Jesse Daniels, 23, randomly stormed up to the boy and dealt a swift kick to his left ear that knocked him to the ground around 2:35 p.m. March 6 on Schenectady Avenue near Union Street in Crown Heights, according to cops and CH Shomrim [who originally posted this video]. Daniels was arrested Tuesday and charged with attempted assault in the second and third degrees, etc. He was released on his own recognizance Wednesday, because the charges do not qualify for bail under the state’s lax bail reform laws. Daniels is accused of punching two women, 30 and 31, in back-to-back unprovoked attacks around 8:25 a.m. March 27 in front of the Goldman Sachs headquarters on West Street near Murray Street, police said. He faced multiple charges – but was ultimately granted supervised release by a judge despite prosecutors’ request that he be held on $5,000 cash bail or $15,000 bond. He was previously nabbed on March 12 for allegedly punching a 31-year-old woman in the face inside Penn Station just before 11 a.m. that day, cops said. Daniels was charged with misdemeanor assault, but was ultimately granted supervised release on the non-bail-eligible offense. In a disturbing act of animal cruelty in Penn Station Feb. 13, he allegedly grabbed a pigeon, ripped off its head and tossed both the head and body on the floor, according to cops and a criminal complaint. Then Daniels – seen wearing the Celtics jacket and carrying the ball – callously stomped on the bird’s body, the court doc said. Daniels was arrested two days later by an Amtrak Police officer who spotted him in the station and charged with torturing animals. Daniels’ first arrest was on July 31, 2025 for allegedly punching a 64-year-old woman in the face, unprovoked, inside the Fulton Street subway station in Lower Manhattan, authorities said.show more

SANParks has launched an investigation to trace and identify... a man seen in viral social media footage allegedly engaging in dangerous and unlawful driving inside the Kruger National Park. They described the incident as deeply concerning and condemned the driver’s actions as reckless, irresponsible and a serious violation of conservation laws. According to SANParks, the footage shows the individual illegally crossing rivers with a vehicle, driving on roads that had officially been closed, and operating the vehicle recklessly within the protected area. Authorities said the conduct displayed a blatant disregard for public safety, environmental protection measures, conservation regulations and the authority of park management. SANParks stressed that national parks are protected under strict environmental legislation, including the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) and the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (NEMPAA). These laws prohibit activities that could damage ecosystems, threaten biodiversity, endanger wildlife or compromise visitor safety. The organisation warned that violations could result in criminal charges, substantial fines, imprisonment, civil claims for damages and administrative sanctions. The agency highlighted that driving through rivers and ignoring road closures can severely damage sensitive ecosystems and infrastructure, while also putting both humans and animals at risk. Road closures in the park are often implemented for critical safety reasons, including flooding, poor road conditions and wildlife movement. SANParks confirmed that officials are actively working to identify the suspect and warned that once located, he could face the full might of the law, including fines and a possible ban from all SANParks-managed protected areas. SANParks said, “We are looking for this individual, and he will face the music.” The organisation also confirmed that gate officials allegedly seen in the video encouraging or supporting the conduct will face consequences for violating park regulations and staff conduct rules. Members of the public with information that may assist investigators have been urged to contact SANParks or the nearest law enforcement authorities. SANParksshow more

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives... interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.show more