Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Gemini 4 Pro vs Opus 5 (max) i gave both models same prompt to build 3D dragon using three.js the hype around Gemini 4 Pro is insane so here's a direct comparison against Opus 5 on max effort tbf Gemini does keeps up with Opus 5's performance which is...

80,225 просмотров • 20 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 25

Фото профиля elstar
elstar20 часов назад

how long did both of them take in comparison?

Фото профиля Tim Jayas
Tim Jayas19 часов назад

didn’t pay much attention to it as both took similar time around 10-15 minutes

Фото профиля Georgiadis Alex
Georgiadis Alex19 часов назад

Where did you find Gemini 4?

Фото профиля Tim Jayas
Tim Jayas19 часов назад

it’s stealth released inside Arena battles

Фото профиля Denise Whore
Denise Whore17 часов назад

@grok do these types of videos show how sophisticated an ai is?

Фото профиля YouBall Z
YouBall Z19 часов назад

Y gémini 4 pro dónde lo probaste en tus sueños jajajajaja no existe aún.

Фото профиля .
.19 часов назад

It's good output from Gemini, the problem with Google model it's cannot remains in the competition for at least a week.

Фото профиля Alice The Ai Expert
Alice The Ai Expert20 часов назад

Both dragons came out fire Gemini 4 Pro keeping up with Opus 5 on max effort is seriously impressive!

Фото профиля Max
Max20 часов назад

in that specific task opus edges it out, but the progress gemini 4 made is genuinely insane think it's more useful comparing it to gemini 3.8 flash to actually see the real jump I did exactly that and ngl 3.8 feels like it's from 2023 while gemini 4 feels straight outta 2026

Фото профиля É?
É?18 часов назад

Esse design parece do claude.

Фото профиля lifetime
lifetime14 часов назад

apparently, the opus 5 is better

Фото профиля artofelection
artofelection17 часов назад

Both are so bad

Фото профиля Boys Vicecity🌴🌅
Boys Vicecity🌴🌅14 часов назад

While the dragon drawn by Opus 5 is an Eastern dragon, like those found in China, the one drawn by Gemini 4 Pro has a Western style. It might be difficult unless we use the same subject.

Фото профиля Omer Bakalovic
Omer Bakalovic19 часов назад

Opus is more stylized and looks better to me. Movements are much more interesting.

Фото профиля AIBotics
AIBotics19 часов назад

The fact that Gemini can stay this close to Opus on a 3D build is already impressive. These coding models are getting ridiculously competitive.

Фото профиля JadeCandles👑19
JadeCandles👑1914 часов назад

My Google ai pro plan is so backkkk! $GOOGL

Фото профиля 刘朝 Zhao Liu
刘朝 Zhao Liu19 часов назад

The dragon comparison is a useful matched-prompt test. Add raw Three.js, runtime labels, interaction checks, and a second requested edit; then report repair rate and time-to-playable result so the Gemini versus Opus gap survives beyond the first render.

Фото профиля Tony
Tony16 часов назад

Gemini 4 is good!

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide15 часов назад

Gemini's dragon actually looks better ngl

Фото профиля Soft Axiom
Soft Axiom14 часов назад

Model comparisons on 3D generation are becoming as common as coding benchmarks. That's the real signal. When frontier labs are getting graded on 'build me a dragon,' spatial/3D reasoning is clearly the next frontier. 🐉

Фото профиля maximum baelz
maximum baelz19 часов назад

The Gemini version looks like a plesiosaur.

Фото профиля Tarun Kathuria
Tarun Kathuria18 часов назад

Opus 5 is a terrible model though….you should also compare it against 5.6 Sol and 6 Astra tbf

Фото профиля Mosesly
Mosesly17 часов назад

CES DEUX LÀ SONT DES CRIMINELS. ASSASSINS

Фото профиля AI News Daily
AI News Daily19 часов назад

Nice comparison. I would add a second prompt with messy requirements and a small code fix, since polished demos can hide how models handle iteration.

Фото профиля AI News Daily
AI News Daily19 часов назад

The second prompt is the important test. A small fix under messy requirements shows whether the model can preserve the existing structure instead of rebuilding everything.

Похожие видео