正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Gemini 4 Pro vs Opus 5 (max) i gave both models same prompt to build 3D dragon using three.js the hype around Gemini 4 Pro is insane so here's a direct comparison against Opus 5 on max effort tbf Gemini does keeps up with Opus 5's performance which is...

103,498 次观看 • 10 天前 •via X (Twitter)

25 条评论

elstar 的头像
elstar10 天前

how long did both of them take in comparison?

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas10 天前

didn’t pay much attention to it as both took similar time around 10-15 minutes

Georgiadis Alex 的头像
Georgiadis Alex10 天前

Where did you find Gemini 4?

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas10 天前

it’s stealth released inside Arena battles

Denise Whore 的头像
Denise Whore10 天前

@grok do these types of videos show how sophisticated an ai is?

YouBall Z 的头像
YouBall Z10 天前

Y gémini 4 pro dónde lo probaste en tus sueños jajajajaja no existe aún.

. 的头像
.10 天前

It's good output from Gemini, the problem with Google model it's cannot remains in the competition for at least a week.

Alice The Ai Expert 的头像
Alice The Ai Expert10 天前

Both dragons came out fire Gemini 4 Pro keeping up with Opus 5 on max effort is seriously impressive!

Max 的头像
Max10 天前

in that specific task opus edges it out, but the progress gemini 4 made is genuinely insane think it's more useful comparing it to gemini 3.8 flash to actually see the real jump I did exactly that and ngl 3.8 feels like it's from 2023 while gemini 4 feels straight outta 2026

É? 的头像
É?10 天前

Esse design parece do claude.

lifetime 的头像
lifetime10 天前

apparently, the opus 5 is better

artofelection 的头像
artofelection10 天前

Both are so bad

Boys Vicecity🌴🌅 的头像
Boys Vicecity🌴🌅10 天前

While the dragon drawn by Opus 5 is an Eastern dragon, like those found in China, the one drawn by Gemini 4 Pro has a Western style. It might be difficult unless we use the same subject.

Omer Bakalovic 的头像
Omer Bakalovic10 天前

Opus is more stylized and looks better to me. Movements are much more interesting.

AIBotics 的头像
AIBotics10 天前

The fact that Gemini can stay this close to Opus on a 3D build is already impressive. These coding models are getting ridiculously competitive.

JadeCandles👑19 的头像
JadeCandles👑1910 天前

My Google ai pro plan is so backkkk! $GOOGL

刘朝 Zhao Liu 的头像
刘朝 Zhao Liu10 天前

The dragon comparison is a useful matched-prompt test. Add raw Three.js, runtime labels, interaction checks, and a second requested edit; then report repair rate and time-to-playable result so the Gemini versus Opus gap survives beyond the first render.

Tony 的头像
Tony10 天前

Gemini 4 is good!

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide10 天前

Gemini's dragon actually looks better ngl

Soft Axiom 的头像
Soft Axiom10 天前

Model comparisons on 3D generation are becoming as common as coding benchmarks. That's the real signal. When frontier labs are getting graded on 'build me a dragon,' spatial/3D reasoning is clearly the next frontier. 🐉

maximum baelz 的头像
maximum baelz10 天前

The Gemini version looks like a plesiosaur.

Tarun Kathuria 的头像
Tarun Kathuria10 天前

Opus 5 is a terrible model though….you should also compare it against 5.6 Sol and 6 Astra tbf

Mosesly 的头像
Mosesly10 天前

CES DEUX LÀ SONT DES CRIMINELS. ASSASSINS

AI News Daily 的头像
AI News Daily10 天前

Nice comparison. I would add a second prompt with messy requirements and a small code fix, since polished demos can hide how models handle iteration.

AI News Daily 的头像
AI News Daily10 天前

The second prompt is the important test. A small fix under messy requirements shows whether the model can preserve the existing structure instead of rebuilding everything.

相关视频